Loading...
1991-02-19 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA FEBRUARY 19, 1991 The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Arnerich. Reverend Dorothy Kimbrell gave the invocation. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas, Withrow and President Corica - 5. Absent: None. ANNOUNCEMENT BY MAYOR OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION(S) 91 -091 President Corica announced that, prior to the regular meeting, Council adjourned to Closed Session and took the following action: Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Subsection (c) of Government Code Section 54956.9 of the Brown Act: authorized initiation of a lawsuit against the County of Alameda on Police Booking Fees. President Corica noted that the State has given the County authority to charge cities for booking fees; the cost could possibly be between $200,000 to $300,000 per year; and cities in Alameda County are getting together to sue, which should create an impact on the County and perhaps the State. CONSENT CALENDAR At the request of Councilmember Thomas, (91 -110 ) Investment Report, and (91 -115) Bills, were removed from the, Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda. At the request of Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, (91 -109) report accepting work of equipment installation on Parking Lots A and C was removed from the Consent Calendar to the regular agenda. Councilmember Withrow moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *91 -092 From Public Works Director recommending award of contract to Watkin & Bortolussi, Inc., for the construction of landscape improvements for Alameda Shoreline Park, Tracts 5905 and 4500, Phase 3B, No. P.W. 1- 90 -02. Accepted. *91 -093 From Public Works Director recommending authorization for an Agreement to loan Parking Meter Funds to Park Street Business Association to cover the Attendant Parking Lots operational deficit. Accepted. February 19, 1991 39 *91-094 From Fire Chief recommending acceptance of work by La Sha, Inc., for construction of Fire Station No. 4, 2595 Mecartney Road, P. W. No. 8-89-13. Accepted. RESOLUTIONS *91-095 Resolution No. 12072 "Supporting a conceptual outline for the future reconfiguration of the governance structure of the balance of Alameda County Job Training Partnership Act Program." Adopted. *91-096 Resolution No. 12073 "Amending the Conflict of Interest Code by amending Paragraph Two of Resolution No. 9460 relative to disclosure positions and disclosure categories and rescinding Resolution No. 10848." Adopted. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *91-097 Ordinance No. 2527 N.S. "Authorizing Amendment to Contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Alameda." Adopted. *91-098 Ordinance No. 2528, N.S. "Authorizing execution of Second Amendment to Tidelands Lease with Alameda Gateway, Ltd." Adopted. *91-099 Ordinance No. 2529, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 17-375 of Article 7, Chapter 3, Title XVII, requiring Cash Box payment of vehicle use in attendant parking lots during normal hours of operation but exiting after hours." Adopted. MINUTES Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 5, 1991. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. HEARINGS 91-100 Consideration of Rezoning, R-90-1, to change the Zoning designation from C-M (Commercial Manufacturing) to R-4 (Neighborhood Residential), on the south side of Buena Vista Avenue between Benton and Arbor Streets, and associated mitigated Negative Declaration IS-90-11 in order to permit further development of residential units, and to bring the zoning designation into compliance with the General Plan designation for the area. Applicants: Mary Araujo and the City of Alameda. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Planning Director reviewed the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. February 19, 1991 L� On the call for proponents and opponents, there were none. President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Camicia moved the Planning Board's recommendation [to certify the proposed mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-90-11 and approve rezoning application, R-90-1, based on the findings in Planning Board Resolutions Nos. 2151 and 2152]. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-101 Consideration of Rezoning, R-90-2, to change the Zoning Designation of 2112 and 2114 Lincoln Avenue, which are developed with non-conforming residential uses, from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District, to R-5, General Residential District and associated mitigated Negative Declaration IS-90-14 in order to permit further development of residential units. Applicant: Allan Brochier for Lester E. Paul, Jr. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Planning Director reviewed the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents and opponents, there were none. President Corica closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the Planning Board's recommendation [to approve Rezoning, R-90-2, based on the findings contained in Planning Board Resolution No. 2143 and certify mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-90-14, based on the findings and conditions contained in Planning Board Resolution No. 2144]. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 91-102 From Vice Chair, Finance Committee, transmitting responses to the City Auditor's Report (90-5), and Committee's by-laws. Councilmember Withrow questioned Section C, Officers, Item No. 3, [Chief Executive Officer]., of the by-laws, which states the Chief Executive Officer shall be the City Manager, and shall be responsible for execution of Committee policies; finds a Committee that is an advisory body to the Council and designating the City Manager a subordinate, inconsistent; the Committee does not have the authority to execute policies that can then be given as a direction to the City Manager to implement, only Council has that authority. The City Manager stated be believes the intent was in terms of communicating to the Council or acquiring information from staff, however, Council may modify the by-laws because, if the Committee February 19, 1991 41 needs information, it will be provided by staff and transmitted on behalf of the staff to Council. President Corica agreed with Councilmember Withrow, does not believe the City Manager should be serving any Committee, the City Manager serves Council; he is not convinced a Chief Executive Officer is needed. Councilmember Camicia moved the recommendation with the exception of Section C, Item No. 3, of Rules, Procedures and By-laws, regarding Chief Executive Officer. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-103 From President, Social Service Human Relations Board, regarding social services and human relations needs in Alameda. Marjorie Rose, 2940 Lincoln Avenue, President, Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB), introduced members of the Board, noted Board's student representative, Allyson Sonneman; stated Board Members each took a specified subject, went to community providers, churches and organizations, requested written input, and interviewed persons; the increased demand for services, reduced funding, lack of affordable space, increasing diverse population, is straining all local services; the report states findings, recommendations, a list of sources and no budget implications; the Board recommends Council accept the SSHRB's 1991 Needs Assessment and authorize its use. Councilmember Camicia moved approval of the report and recommendation. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-104 From Chair, Economic Development Commission, regarding adaptive reuse of 1533 and 1537 Webster Street. President Corica explained the subject under consideration is whether or not some activity, e.g., the Children's Theater, can be placed in the Webster Street area by reuse of two buildings. Councilmember Camicia moved recommendation [to pursue sub-lease agreement with Richard Roth for a portion of 1533 Webster Street; and, for 1537 Webster Street, pursue a 20-year lease with owners, and a sub-lease to Alameda Children's Musical Theater]. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion. No vote was taken. Councilmember Thomas stated she is unclear what the City will be liable for. President Corica inquired about City costs. The City Manager stated, concerning 1533 Webster Street, the City is considering 2500 to 3000 square feet as a sub-lease, at approximately 80 cents/sq.ft. or $2000 to $2400 per month. Christopher Hanson, Alameda, Real Estate Agent, stated the existing sub-lease would be for a three-year term with option to extend the term. February 19, 1991 The City Manager noted there are 5100 square feet in the building. Councilman Arnerich inquired how much the City needs, to which the City Manager replied it appears 2500 square feet. Councilmember Thomas clarified Richard Roth is paying 80 cents a square foot, and the City would sub-lease from him for the same sum. Councilmember Withrow pointed out Mr. Roth would not be making a profit on the transaction. Councilmember Camicia stated as long as the City is covered, he would like a place for the Children's Musical Theater; he believes Police presence is a good idea and inquired if the square footage will be sufficient. President Corica stated he has mixed feelings on the Police annex; he would prefer to put the money into more Police walking patrol; if someone has a problem with the Police, they should come to City Hall; the Police should be walking up and down streets; he is more interested in visibility, than a place to make a report. Councilmember Camicia stated there would still be visibility with foot patrols, the space would be for writing reports, and interviewing people; utilizing the building would help Webster Street and keeping the Children's Theater is a good investment. President Corica stated perhaps a business could occupy the building and bring in tax money. Councilmember Camicia agreed that would be good. Councilman Arnerich stated he believes it would be good to have a Police annex, the patrols are still present and highly visible; the annex would be a good place for Police to take someone off the street to talk to and make reports. President Corica stated, if money is to be spent, another foot patrol should be added. Councilman Arnerich inquired about the amount of square footage that would be used for the Police annex. The City Manager stated the space would be 120 square feet. The Police Chief stated the room would be small and would contain a telephone and a work station. Councilmember Camicia stated if Mr. Roth can get more money from someone else, and there is opportunity to bring something good to Webster Street, the City could back out early. Councilmember Thomas inquired if the Police Department is willing to fund the lease on a pro rata basis out of its budget. February 19, 1991 43 The City Manager clarified the Police Department's square footage would only cost $96 per month. Councilmember Thomas discussed response time with the Police Chief; and inquired if the patrol would now be staffed 24 hours a day, to which the Police Chief stated the walking patrol is, and will be staffed from 5:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m., the critical time of the day; there is staffing seven days a week when possible, but sometimes only four days because of staff shortages; he favors walking patrol and would like them sixteen hours a day but must prioritize. The City Manager noted alternatives in the report, for offices which envision having other organizations during the daytime; the police would be present in the evening. Councilmember Camicia stated this is an opportunity to do something positive for Webster Street. Councilmember Thomas stated there are a couple of theaters in town and Kofman Auditorium and inquired if there is some reason the Children's Theater cannot use them. Margery Fredericks, 3242 Bayo Vista, Managing Director, Children's Theater, stated Altarena has a very full schedule and cannot fit others in; Kofman Auditorium is very expensive; schools have not permitted use of their buildings; the churches are the locations that have been most generous. Councilmember Withrow moved approval [regarding 1533 Webster Street, to pursue a sub-lease agreement with Richard Roth; and concerning 1537 Webster Street, to pursue a 20-year lease with the owners, and a sub-lease to the Alameda Children's Musical Theater]. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-105 From Planning Director providing a status report consisting of a presentation by Thomas Fox and Richard Bennett, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) on the current drought situation and EBMUD's new Model Water Conservation Landscape Ordinance. Mr. Fox presented and explained handouts distributed to Council showing graphs comparing drought years, and storage, including precipitation and water in reservoirs; stated if there is one more dry year, EBMUD will have no more water for Alameda; alternatives for EBMUD are 1) to authorize staff to seek supplemental source of supply, 2) authorize funding of environmental studies to use that supply, 3) declare a drought emergency; EBMUD has been looking for water to buy; at present the only hope is the Delta with 30,000 to 60,000 acre feet; if it can be purchased, many regulatory steps must be taken with various governmental and other agencies; water may be gained by blending current pure water with Delta water with degredation to water quality; the water situation is very serious; EBMUD will be considering declaring a drought emergency very soon at which time a 32 to 35 percent cutback in residential water use may be requested and that will require combining the cutback with rate increases. February 19, 1991 44 President Corica stated residents do not understand why it is necessary to pay more money for less water. Mr. Fox explained EBMUD is a public utility, not privately owned; $90,000,000 is fixed operating cost; when people begin to save water, revenue is lost, and when the revenue drops, prices must be raised in order to meet operating level; the only way EBMUD can raise revenue, as a public utility, is by raising rates. Mr. Fox stated EBMUD has met with environmental groups, community groups, and has revised its landscape guidelines to be more applicable to cities; the guidelines will be coming to Council; and EBMUD will offer services to the City to cut the City's cost in implementing the guidelines; if the City has landscape guidelines to implement, EBMUD will do plan checks and site checks to make sure EBMUD is not passing on new costs. Councilman Arnerich inquired about the time required and the process of building desalinization plants such as the one Santa Barbara is building. Mr. Fox replied Santa Barbara is looking toward bringing ships from Oregon, transporting water, and looking at desalinization plants; desalinization plants, of Saudi Arabian size, require multi-millions of dollars and if EBMUD built one, water produced would cost up to $2000 per acre foot compared to current rates of $250 per acre foot, and the rates would be passed on, and that is why EBMUD does not want to go in that direction. Councilmember Withrow moved acceptance of the report. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-106 From Planning Director regarding consideration of a decision to hear an Appeal of a Planning Board denial of Use Permit UP-90-29 to permit a conversion of a residential use to a professional office use of a property located at 2042 Central Avenue within the R-5 (General Residential) District. Applicant: Gerald Gelle, DDS. The Planning Director stated the issue is Council's decision as to whether Council will hear the Appeal, and if so, the Appeal would be heard at a subsequent meeting. The City Attorney confirmed all Council is doing is setting the hearing, if Council wishes to hear the Appeal. Councilmember Withrow moved Council grant the hearing [of the Appeal]. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. President Corica clarified the Appeal would be heard March 7th. 91-107 From Planning Director regarding consideration of a decision to hear an Appeal of a Planning Board approval of Use Permit UP-90-30 to allow the establishment of a Farmers' Market on Central February 19, 1991 45 Avenue between McKay Avenue and Webster Street, located within the C-2 (Central Business) District. Applicant: Donald Kaplan for Bonfare Markets, Inc. President Corica stated he watched the issue when it was before the Planning Board; he has seen what the Farmers Market has done for Alameda, bringing in a lot of business and money, and he is not for hearing the Appeal because he does not believe votes are present to dispose of the Farmers' Market. Councilman Arnerich agreed with President Corica, stated he believes Bonfare Market objection is that people cannot enter because of the Farmers' Market. The City Manager stated there are three ways in and out; and he believes the concern is that the entrance from Central is blocked off for a four-hour period. President Corica stated the blockage is only for a few hours; the Farmers' Market last year was a great success; Alameda citizens liked it; and he believes people are looking forward to its return. Councilmember Camicia suggested the parking lots of Liquor Barn and the Drive-In Movie be given consideration as possible locations for the Farmers' Market. Councilmember Thomas stated she agrees with Councilmember Camicia: noted Berkeley has two separate locations; she would like the Farmers' Market expanded to include Saturdays, and McKay Avenue, EBRPD and College of Alameda (Saturdays only) parking lots considered as potential sites for next year. President Corica stated perhaps the Appeal should be denied, have the Farmers' Market look at locations mentioned, and come back next year and perhaps try another location. The City Manager stated the City Attorney requests the reason for the Bonfare Market request be read into the record, the Planning Director can read that in; staff will investigate other locations. President Corica clarified Farmers' Market would be permitted to remain where they are this year, and for next year, the locations can be considered. Councilmember Camicia so moved. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion. The Planning Director, for the record, stated the Bonfare Market is concerned about the access issue and the competitive issue as Bonfare Market has a vegetable section and the Farmers' Market would be competing with that. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-108 From Finance Director regarding application of the Utility Users Tax Ordinance to Cable Television. February 19, 1991 Don Roberts, 880 Portola Drive, stated the franchise is already paying a 5% franchise tax; as fees are increased, subscribers are lost, which would impact the existing 5% franchise tax; and requested Council reagendize the ordinance and cancel it entirely. President Corica stated he finds it difficult to place another 5% tax on anyone at this point in time. Ronda Cohn, General Manager, United Cable, stated Council voted in September for the tax because Council believed the right to do so might be taken away; the right was not taken away; Cable is not a utility, a 5% franchise fee is being paid; Cable is a discretionary purchase that people will choose not to make if prices keep going up; Cable is a first amendment speaker, which is important to remember. President Corica stated he is not going to support adding another 5% [tax] the citizens of Alameda. Councilmember Thomas stated the reason this is being brought back is because Councilmember Withrow proposed [See Minutes of 9/4/90 Council Meeting, Paragraph No. 90-634] Council approve the fees with the contingency that staff report within 90 days with the requirement to find if the utility tax is the best way to raise taxes, otherwise the tax will revert to the current standard; he said the intent was to preserve Council's options, and moved approval contingent upon subsequent approval by Council within a defined period of time reasonable to define the requirements, and if defined requirements are not passed by Council, the Utility Users Taxes will come off; and Councilmember Camicia stated if Council cannot keep the tax in place, prioritization of City services should be included; therefore she would like to see prioritization of City services, believes the tax should be rescinded as in the original motion, and wants to see what services will be cut if the tax is not passed; funds are being given out, e.g., to the Children's Theater, the Historic Museum, while staff is talking about cutting services. The City Manager stated staff brought to Council on December 5, 1990, a plan to reduce expenditures by approximately $1,067,000 for the current year, which was approved by Council with authority for the City Manager to make adjustments through the year, and staff is proceeding on that basis; by the end of March perhaps enough information can be provided to project through the current fiscal year and determine whether next year the City will be impacted, and to what extent, by the recession, at that time staff can come back and give Council additional informaton and then Council can agendize the matter at that time if they wish. Councilman Arnerich stated perhaps that would be the best time to reagendize the matter, rather than at the next meeting. Councilmember Thomas stated that she agreed, and the matter can be postponed until after the Election if that is the point. Councilmember Thomas stated if cuts must be made, groups should not February 19, 1991 47 be continually coming to meetings for funding of new projects, e.g., the Children's Theater; and she would like to see what services must be cut. Councilmember Camicia stated Council has said services may have to be cut; at some point those services may need to be identified; but perhaps services may not need to be cut, if Council raises a couple of utilities such as Cable TV. Councilmember Camicia questioned Ms. Cohn concerning the current number of subscribers, basic rate, previous rate, loss of premium service customers, etc., to which Ms. Cohn replied the number of current subscribers is 14,000, the basic rate is $16.95; there are five services that are an additional $2; the last rate increase was in December, the previous rate was $16.20; not many subscribers were lost, however some premium channel customers were lost, which is what franchise tax and utility tax are based on. Councilmember Camicia stated the entire industry has lost premium channel subscribers over the last few years; it is not phenomenon of government raising tax but of the business shaking out. President Corica stated he understands but is also concerned that a lot of senior citizens may have only Cable Television as a source of entertainment and 5% can be a lot to someone on a fixed income, so he will not vote for it. Councilmember Thomas stated the point is that in September it was indicated as a requirement, Councilmember Camicia wanted a prioritization of which services would be cut, that has not been done; in the meantime, several significant expenditures have been added, including the Library and City Hall renovation and those things need to be looked at before starting to raise taxes; and it is her understanding of the reading of the motion and the adoption, the tax is not valid. President Corica stated the decision will not be made tonight, but at the next meeting, with more discussion, when Council votes on the ordinance. Councilmember Camicia agreed, and stated many projects need to be funded for the City and without steps like [the Utility Users Tax], it will be necessary to make cuts. Councilmember Thomas stated Council had asked for the Finance Committee to report back, and believed that was how Council was going to make its decision. President Corica requested a motion that Council agendize the related ordinance for consideration at a future Council meeting. Councilmember Thomas so moved. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-109 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Inter Technomics, Inc., for parking control equipment installation February 19, 1991 48 and lot configuration of Lots A and C. Accepted. Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-110 From Finance Director transmitting Investment Report for period ending January 31, 1991. Accepted. Councilmember Thomas requested an explanation of the report from the Finance Director. The Finance Director noted the City's $35,000,000 reserves are basically ea/narked for capital improvements, noted the average rate of return, length of terms on notes, further summarized the report, and clarified interest rates. Councilmember Thomas moved acceptance. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 91-111 Resolution No. 12074 "Appointing R.E. "Rick" Stone as Member of the Golf Commission." Adopted. Councilmember Camicia moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office. President Corica commended Robert O'Maley for his efforts in helping to make the Golf Course successful, during his six years of service on the Golf Commission, and noted a Certificate of Service would be awarded to him. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 91-112 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending Section 17-432 of Chapter 4, Article 3, Title XVII, to establish Stop Signs at Kilkenny Place and Applegate Way at their intersection with Kofman Parkway." The City Manager noted two changes to be made in the proposed ordinance, regarding Kilkenny Place, northeasterly corner to southeasterly corner, and on Applegate Way and Kofmann Parkway, the existing ordinance says southwesterly corner and should read northwesterly corner. Councilmember Camicia moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-113 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending Section 17-333 thereof relating to prohibition of February 19, 1991 49 parking at various times and locations to facilitate street sweeping (Minor adjustments to existing time schedule)." Elizabeth Roth, Alameda, stated there are parking prohibitions, e.g., 7:00 to 10:00 a.m., for street sweepers; the sweepers go by, cars are then parked in front of homes before the time period ends and tickets are received; and she wants to know if there is a purpose in ticketing cars when the people know the sweeper has passed by earlier. Councilman Arnerich stated he has heard the same comment, but sometimes the person issuing tickets does not know the sweeper has gone by. President Corica stated sometimes evidence of the sweeper can be seen, but sometimes cannot; perhaps something can be worked out. President Corica suggested the ordinance be passed with emphasis on "minor adjustments." Councilmember Withrow so moved. The motion was not seconded. The Police Chief stated parking enforcement people try to enforce the spirit of the law, but as pointed out, determining when the sweepers have been by is sometimes difficult, and if enforcement becomes very precise, that could not be kept up all the time and would not be reliable. Councilmember Camicia moved introduction. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 91-114 ORDINANCE NO. 2530, N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by adding Section 15-6214 through 15-6219 to Article 2, Chapter 6 of Title XV thereof, establishing requirements for a Recycling Program for curbside residential recycling and prohibiting unauthorized collection of recyclable materials, and amending Subsection (Y), Article 1, Chapter 5, Title I (Violations Identified)." President Corica stated he would abstain on this matter [because a family member works for Oakland Scavenger]. Councilmember Camicia moved final passage of the ordinance. Councilmember Withrow seconded the motion which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Camicia, Thomas, Withrow and Vice Mayor Arnerich - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions: President Corica - 1. BILLS 91-115 Councilmember Withrow moved ratification of the Bills, certified by the City Manager to be correct, in the amount of February 19, 1991 50 $2,730,476.49. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Withrow and President Corica - 4. Noes: Councilmember Thomas - 1. Absent: None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 91-116 Councilmember Thomas requested the status of isee Unfinished Business, February 5, Council Meeting] a report concerning environmental impact of the construction of 181-foot-tall buildings at the end of the northeastern tip of the [Harbor Bay] Business Park, to which the City Manager responded it will be on the next Agenda [Consent Calendar]. 91-117 Councilmember Thomas requested that the transfer tax report [see Unfinished Business„ February 5 Council Meeting] be placed on the next Agenda. 91-118 Herb Severns, Alameda, stated he learned of a March 1 Meeting concerning Unreinforced Masonry Building financing at a recent [Bay Vision] 2020 Meeting, and advised Councilmembers Arnerich and Withrow accordingly. NEW BUSINESS 91-119 Consideration of nomination for appointment to Pension Board. (Continued from February 5, 1991, Council Meeting) President Corica nominated Clarence R. Kline as member of the Pension Board. Councilmember Thomas seconded the nomination which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 91-120 Councilman Arnerich commented that the next Regular Council Meeting [March 5] will be adjourned to Thursday, March 7th. President Corica confirmed that, because of the Municipal Election on March 5, an Adjourned Regular Meeting would be held on Thursday, March 7, 1991. 91-121 Councilmember Thomas requested the Traffic Advisory Committee review a four-way stop at Gibbons Drive and Santa Clara Avenue, to which the Public Works Director responded an Ordinance was recently adopted by Council which will become effective following the 30-day period. February 19, 1991 51 ADJOURNMENT 91-122 Mayor Corica adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m., in honor of the troops serving in the Persian Gulf, in hope for their speedy return, and with pride for their supporting both our country and the world. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. February 19, 1991