Loading...
1988-10-04 Regular CC Minutes275 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OCTOBER 4,1988 88 -624 The meeting convened at 7:33 p.m., at the conclusion of a Closed Session to consider the Workers' Compensation Claims of Officer Thomas Murphy and Shirley Boylan, and the case of Hallam v. City of Alameda, and the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners), with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Arnerich. Reverend Robert Keller gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Absent: MINUTES Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef, Thomas, and President Corica - 5. [Councilmember Camicia arrived at 9:30 p.m.) None. Councilman Arnerich made a motion to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of September 20, 1988. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY 88 -625 Proclamation declaring October 8, 1988 as Mary McLeod Bethune Recognition Awards Day. President Corica read the proclamation and presented it to Shirley Rogers, who accepted on behalf of the Northern California Section of the National Council of Negro Women, Inc., noting Mary McLeod Bethune founded the Council in 1937, founded a college in Florida, and was appointed special advisor to President Franklin Roosevelt. Ms. Rogers expressed appreciation for the proclamation and recognition of the Awards Day. 88 -626 Proclamation declaring October 9 to 15 as Public Power Week. President Corica commented the Bureau of Electricity is non - profit, is for the benefit of the citizens, and noted ratepayers in Alameda still pay lower rates than if they were using P.G.& E.; the Bureau is the oldest municipal utility in California and one of the oldest in the nation, and has been providing efficient, reliable and cost - effective service for 101 years; and presented a framed proclamation to Maerose Humphreys. Maerose Humphreys, Assistant to the General Manager of the Bureau of Electricity, noted there will be displays at the Library, City Hall and the Bureau, expressed appreciation on behalf of the Bureau, and stated she hoped Congressman Fortney (Pete) Stark will have the proclamation entered in the Congressional Record. October 4, 1988 276 CONSENT CALENDAR Item 1 -K (See 88 -649) regarding permanent public access at shoreline area adjacent to Bayview Estates, was removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular Agenda at the request of citizens; and, at the request of Councilmember Thomas, Item No. 1 -D, (See 88 -646) regarding Alameda County Senior Housing Bond Issue - Measure C, Item No. 1 -E, (See 88 -647) regarding Proposition 84, Housing and Homeless Bond Act of 1988, and Item No. 1 -L (See 88 -650) regarding Alameda Police Association Letter of Understanding, were also removed from the Consent Calendar for placement on the regular Agenda. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *88 -627 From Acting Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by O.C. Jones & Sons for Constitution Way, Phase IIIB, street construction, P.W. No. 8- 87 -20. Accepted. *88 -628 From Acting Public Works Director recommending an 18 -month extension of time in which to complete the improvements for Tract 5603 (Otis Drive and Willow Street). Accepted. *88 -629 From Acting Public Works Director regarding the lease purchase of hardware and software for geobased permit system. Accepted. RESOLUTIONS *88 -630 Resolution No. 11564 "Awarding contract for Sales Tax Audit and Information Services." Adopted. *88 -631 Resolution No. 11565 "Authorizing certain City officials and a City contractor access to Sales and Use Tax records pursuant to Section 7056 of the Revenue and Taxation Code." Adopted. *88 -632 Resolution No. 11566 "Approving and ratifying amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement creating the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority." Adopted. *88 -633 Resolution No. 11567 "Approving Parcel Map No. 5478 (627 Pacific Avenue) and granting an exception from Section 11- 3118.1 of the Subdivision Ordinance requiring undergrounding of utilities." Adopted. *88 -634 Resolution No. 11568 "Resolution of Intention to vacate portions of a 55 -foot public utilities easement within Lot 1 and Lot 4, Parcel Map No. 3832 -1; fixing time, date and location for a public hearing; and ordering publication and posting of Notice." Adopted. October 4, 1988 277 FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *88 -635 Ordinance No. 2405, N.S. "Reclassifying and rezoning of a certain property within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S.; Applicant: City of Alameda, R -88 -4, the property located at 1238 Versailles Avenue." Adopted. *88 -636 Ordinance No. 24061 N.S. "Amending Ordinance No. 2251, N.S., authorizing the Transmission Agency of Northern California to issue revenue bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness." Adopted. BILLS *88 -637 A List of Claims certified by the City Manager to be true and correct was approved in the sum of $1,082,477.44. * * * * * * * * ** WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 88 -638 From David Pastor, 2153 Santa Clara Avenue, encouraging Council to review and amend Ordinance No. 1358, N.S. relating to use of streets for sale of goods from vehicles. Mr. Pastor requested Council change wording of the ordinance to allow selling of sandwiches, cold canned soft drinks and bagged potato chips, as it would provide a service to students and workers and might cut down on noon hour traffic. Richard Colunga, 610 Flower Lane, stated he owns Lunch on Leggs, does not want to come down Park Street and compete with merchants, there are schools and industries where there are no delicatessens to buy items; and requested Council change the ordinance so sales may be made in those areas. Councilmember Thomas inquired if candy and cigarettes are sold, to which Mr. Colunga replied no cigarettes are sold, and no candy is taken to the schools for sale. Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, Park Street Business Association, stated rolling stores are a direct and unfair competition for merchants, and the Assessment District and the City would need to pay for the litter to be cleaned up. Councilmember Thomas stated Assessment District and litter are important, there might be a way to work things out; perhaps the operation could be reviewed in six months; other merchants would not be affected by sales at the college; and perhaps it might be worthwhile to consider an ordinance that would set up locations by permit. The City Manager commented the ordinance does not preclude rolling stores from the college or private sites now; that what they want is to sell on the private streets. Councilman Arnerich commented there already may be too any fast October 4, 1988 2 8 food places; believes rolling stores would cut into the business of the merchants that are near the schools, there would be a difficult problem of clean -up on the beach, and it would be difficult for him to approve a change of the ordinance. The City Attorney noted the problem at the beach would be the fact that the rolling stores would be parking on the road. President Corica agreed with Councilman Arnerich that it would complicate problems of cleanup on South Shore. Councilmember Monsef stated he agreed and would therefore not support a change of ordinance. Councilmember Monsef moved to accept staff's recommendation to not amend the ordinance. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. 88 -639 From Alameda Chamber of Commerce, 2314 Central Avenue, regarding its community public relations services. President Corica stated the City is working with the Chamber of Commerce, he appreciates what the Chamber is doing for the City, it is doing a good job and there are frequent meetings with the Chamber. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the communication, and complimented the Chamber on their services. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. President Corica announced that Item No. 9, (See 88 -648) regarding support for Measure E - Special Tax for Drug Prevention activities, will not be heard as it was placed on the agenda by Councilmember Camicia who is not certain he will be able to be present and would like the resolution held over to the next Council Meeting. 88 -640 From Bruce Conrad, President, West Alameda Business Association, 1721 Webster Street, requesting meter free parking on Saturdays. Mr. Conrad, stated he believes metered parking should be on Webster Street on the same basis that it is on Park Street. President Corica noted that Webster Street had an opportunity in the past to participate but the West Alameda Business Association (WABA) decided not to. Mr. Conrad replied that it was the judgment at one point that it would be abused but is believed now to be beneficial. Councilman Arnerich inquired if there are any plans to monitor the parking, noting some merchants park at meters, and if so, how can it be enforced, to which Mr. Conrad replied that specific plans October 4, 1988 279 have not been formulated; perhaps there should be informal citations for offenders. Councilman Arnerich discussed the income from meters in the Webster Street area, and the City Manager stated that figures are now being kept by district and he will be able to provide better figures than previously, and will report back to Council. Ed Clark, 1422 Cottage Street, former President of WABA stated the opinion of the public had been underestimated, the merchants had just been polled and it has led to the decision to experiment with metered parking. Gail Wetzwork, 3452 Capella Lane, Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of free parking meters on Webster Street. President Corica stated there is a recommendation from the City Manager to extend the meter free parking program to Webster Street. Councilmember Monsef moved acceptance of the City Manager's recommendation. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion. Councilmember City Manager The motion was HEARINGS Thomas discussed the need for stickers, to which the responded that he had a supply. carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. 88 -641 Consideration of proposed Negative Declaration and Zoning Text Amendment (ZA -88 -3) to (1) amend the M -1, Intermediate Industrial (Manufacturing) District, M -2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District, C -M, Commercial - Manufacturing District and C -2, Central Business District to permit commercial marinas with a Use Permit, (2) add definitions for commercial marinas, live - aboards, anchor -outs and houseboats, (3) place added restrictions on live - aboards and houseboats, (4) eliminate commercial marinas and private docks as permitted uses in the Open Space (0) Zone, and (5) amend yard requirements for residential properties adjacent to waterways. Applicant: City of Alameda. President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Planning Director explained the background of the matter, noting that the Planning Board recommended acceptance of the Negative Declaration and introduction of the related ordinance. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, the following person spoke: Dean Anderson, 2099 Grand Street On the call for opponents, the following person spoke: Edward Shaffer, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, 1855 Olympic Blvd., Walnut Creek, representing October 4, 1988 280 Ballena Isle Marina, Ballena Boulevard The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Thomas requested comments from the Planning Director. The Planning Director responded that he does not believe Mr. Shaffer and his client are in disagreement with the staff or the Planning Board, but it is a matter of degree and language; it is the intent to apply mitigation measures just as Mr. Shaffer is suggesting; and further discussed items suggested by Mr. Shaffer. President Corica commented that the City probably has one of the most modern houseboat facilities to be found; it probably will be helpful for people who have boats at the marina to comply now with what will be required by the State in the future; and the City is taking a step in the right direction. Councilman Arnerich inquired if there were any comments from the City Attorney on the points raised by Mr. Shaffer. The City Attorney commented he believes the points were raised out of an abundance of caution; there are notes in the ordinance for clarification; the gray areas will be in the list of 13 items which appear to be the standards by which the conditional uses will be granted; it is a long list, and he believes the status of the existing marinas is clear. Councilmember Monsef agreed with the findings of the Planning Commission, commented he believes the language is clear and the ordinance is a step in the right direction. Councilmember Monsef moved acceptance of the Negative Declaration. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to take the ordinance out of order. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. 88 -642 Ordinance No. N.S. "Amending Chapter 1, Title XI (Zoning) of the Alameda Municipal Code relating to marinas. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to introduce the ordinance and Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion. Councilmember Thomas stated she believes the intent of the ordinance is clear but does not go far enough; regarding Item no 5 [Subsection (p) of Sec. 11 -1335 - Uses Requiring Use Permits] which states "Conditions . . . shall include provisions for the termination . . .," believes there should be automatic termination of such agreements. The City Attorney noted that the word "shall" is means the Planning Board would have to put as approval on the marina, that the leases shall be this condition, so if it is not terminated, that included which a condition of terminated upon puts the marina October 4, 1988 281 owner in jeopardy of losing his permit with the City. Councilman Arnerich stated he somewhat concurs with Councilmember Thomas, because "shall include provisions for the termination" does not say "shall include the termination." The City Attorney noted he is sure the current rental and lease agreements do not include [provisions for termination] but now they will need to include a temination provision. The Planning Director suggested that in the first line where it says "shall include provisions for ", if the word "for" is changed to "requiring," that would meet Council's intent. Councilmember Thomas inquired if there are any marinas, at this time, that are not covered by permit, to which the Planning Director stated he believes all the marinas in place would fall under the grandfathering clause at this point. Councilmember Monsef stated his willingness to include the change of wording [from "for" to "requiring." Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion with the change, and the motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 88 -643 From Chairman, Strategic Planning Committee, providing a status report on fundraising effort. Bill Withrow, 133 Cumberland Way, Chairman, Strategic Planning Committee, stated the Committee sent letters to 29 organizations and business leaders, and made personal phone calls, the School Board has committed $10,000 for the process, there are commitments from the business community for $10,000, but there are 15 addressees that have not yet replied, and because of that, the Committee would like to postpone the funding request; and by October 20, there can be a more complete status. Bonnie Conner, 163 Sea Bridge, stated she will postpone comments until October 20th, when the report has been submitted. Bonny Moore, 627 Lincoln Avenue, # 22, stated Council should be very clear about what it expects from the Committee, and should have someone oversee the Committee. Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, stated financing for Strategic Plan Phases 2 and 3 could be used for a staff person. Christopher Hanson, answered questions raised by a previous speaker and stated what the Committee hopes to accomplish by its procedure. President Corica suggested perhaps Councilmembers could replace any Committee members they originally appointed who have subsequently left the Committee. Mr. Hanson noted the Committee has made no recommendations to the City Council on how to staff the Committee; the biggest problem October 4, 1988 282 the Committee faces is discontinuance of momentum, and one reason they are pushing to raise funds is to expedite the process. Councilman Arnerich stated the discontent appears to be that work is at a standstill; standstills occur in projects and he cannot see why some people do not want to have any more to do with it; and requested a response from the Committee Chairman. Mr. Withrow stated it was a good observation, that a job worth doing is sometimes difficult but there have been 41 persons who have validated their commitment, and are working hard. Kevin Harper, 112 Norwich, stated it is true some interest has waned and one reason is that there is not a facilitator, some people will not expend time until there is approval from the City and funding is approved; and requested a continuance. Councilmember Monsef stated the Committee has done well, the document should be prepared with public input and by the people; the Committee has received community support; they need a mediator; and Council should give them the time they need. Councilmember Thomas reviewed the original estimate for strategic 'planning and the Arthur Young proposal of $39,000; regarding long term strategic planning, there may be new persons elected who want to input; she did not vote for it before and will not at this time; for $39,000, there could have been a well - designed survey; the School District had adequate representation on the Committee; and questioned how the Committee is going to solve the transportation and school problems. President Corica stated that, when he was interviewed by Arthur Young & Associates, he commented that if they could solve just the traffic problem, they were worth $100,000; the Committee wants more time to raise funding; and he would like to hear a recommendation this be continued to the next Council meeting. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the communication as submitted. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Monsef and President Corica - 3. Noes: Councilmember Thomas - 1. Absent: Councilmember Camicia - 1. 88 -644 From Chief of Police submitting a status report on construction feasibility, preliminary design, and cost estimates for a Type I Jail Facility. President Corica commented on the process of getting a City jail; some of the funding mechanism is in place and there is a search for additional funding methods; the Chief of Police has presented an extensive report regarding the reasons funding is needed and why a new jail is necessary, together with a survey, and by having a jail, it would save approximately 600 manhours per year. The Chief of Police noted the Oakland City Jail often closes on weekends, and does not receive prisoners, and it is necessary to transport prisoners to Santa Rita; the process of providing a jail October 4, 1988 283 is underway, however, funding is needed. Councilmember Monsef requested an estimate of funding needed, to which the Chief of Police replied the cost estimate to build the jail is approximately $1,300,000; within a few months, there will probably be about $1,000,000 in the Asset Seizure Fund, and he is working with the City Manager and Finance Director for other funding mechanisms. Councilmember Monsef inquired about the timetable. The City Manager responded that there are a number of other unbudgeted items that have been coming before Council, and it is his intent to have the report discussing jail funding and other capital items at the next meeting. Councilmember Thomas discussed with the Chief, the cost of the proposal to go up one floor in the Police Administration Building to which he replied it was not costed out because it was considered to be too costly, noted the architect is in the audience for technical questions, the Building has been used for 11 years and he believes the current plan could be sufficient for at least another 11 years, and the foreseeable future. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. 88 -645 From Acting Fire Chief regarding the status of certain fire apparatus. The Acting Fire Chief stated that apparatus are aging and a long range replacement program is in order; and there should shortly be a replacement program and a financing plan before Council. President Corica noted the replacement cost of a fire engine is $180,000 and for an aerial ladder truck it is $360,000. Councilmember Thomas noted replacement of some first-line equipment was due to be done in 1986 and inquired what is being done to relieve the situation, to which the Acting Fire Chief replied that steps are being taken to alleviate the problem; if another ladder truck were to go out of service, that would be serious; and as the report indicates, the reserve truck had to be taken out of service as it was 37 years old. Councilmember Monsef moved to accept the report. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. 88 -646 From Executive Director of the Housing Authority supporting the Alameda County Senior Housing Bond Issue - Measure C. Councilmember Thomas stated she took this off the Consent Calendar as she wondered how much this costs; that it was on the ballot and didn't pass and wonders if it needs to be put right back on the ballot; she does not believe something should go right back on the October 4, 1988 284 ballot when it has failed; and the voters of Alameda had a low percentage of voters compared to the other voters in the County. President Corica stated that some of the measures require a two - thirds majority and he believes a simple majority should suffice; there was 61% throughout the County, therefore, the majority did vote, and as the subject is senior citizen housing and it is very difficult to oppose attempts to get housing for senior citizens, he does not have a problem putting it back on the ballot as it came close [to passing] the last time. Councilmember Monsef moved to accept the recommendation. President Corica seconded the motion. Councilmember Monsef stated that the vote was very close and perhaps the public was not yet educated about it; does not believe the cost will be very much with all the other items that are on the ballot; and believes Council should not deny giving it another chance. Councilmember Thomas stated she will vote no; that it will not be a vote against senior housing, but just this particular mechanism of putting it on a repeat ballot. The motion failed by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Monsef and President Corica - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Arnerich and Thomas - 2. Absent: Councilmember Camicia - 1. 88 -647 From Executive Director of the Housing Authority supporting Proposition 84, Housing and Homeless Bond Act of 1988. Councilmember Thomas stated she needs clarification; read a breakdown of allocations listed in the report; and inquired if the first $300,000,000 is the first bond measure. The Executive Director replied that the legislation adopted by the California legislature included the total of $450,000,000; $300,000,000 is on the ballot this November, the remaining $150,000,000 is on the following ballot; the total in this report is given as $450,000,000, therefore it has to be done proportionately in terms of what is on the ballot; the money that is to go into rental units is to go into the State's rental housing construction program, which has been an ongoing program which has not been funded in the last several years, but the statewide average is given and the program allows for differing costs in differing jurisdictions. Councilmember Camicia arrived at 9:30, p.m. Councilmember Thomas stated the $300,000,000 will not help Alameda, is just not enough, does not see how rental units can be built in Alameda, and cannot see a breakdown of the $300,000,000. The Executive Director commented some of the measures relate to rehabilitation, the development of additional emergency shelter beds for the homeless, and the position of the Housing Commission October 4, 1988 285 who is recommending adoption is based on the need statewide; and cannot speak to the question of proportionality without going through the specific measure itself, but it is probably two-thirds on the first ballot and one-third on the second. Councilmember Camicia moved acceptance of the report. Councilman Arnerich stated he is distressed the question raised by Councilmember Thomas was not fully answered. Councilmember Camicia stated this Proposition will affect not only the City of Alameda but the State of California and it addresses a major problem a lot of people are concerned about, believes Council is being asked to make a statement on the support of a statewide proposition, and is therefore worth supporting. Councilmember Thomas stated she does not question the need except for the $50,000,000 for 4000 first-time homebuyers, but does question if the first $300,000,000 on the first bond issue is going to go to rental housing which will not take place in Alameda. President Corica suggested holding the matter over to the next Council meeting. Councilman Arnerich moved to hold the report over to the next Council meeting. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 88-648 Resolution No. Supporting Measure E - Special Tax for Drug Prevention activities. (Councilmember Camicia) (This item will be continued to the October 20, 1988, Council Meeting.) 88-649 Resolution No. 11569. "Establishing permanent public access at shoreline area adjacent to Bayview Estates." Adopted. Bill Kane, 2615 Bayview, President, Board of Directors, Bayview Estates, stated he is in favor of the proposal, the only problem is with the bicycling, protests wording to the BCDC, believes the bicycling is inappropriate for this stretch of shoreline and requests the word bicycling be removed. Arline Martin, 381 Anchor Way, stated her understanding of the location of the public access easement and asked it be affirmed. President Corica inquired of the City Manager if it is true that if the word "bicycling" is taken out, the document would not be acceptable to BCDC, and it would be necessary to redo the whole process with BCDC to which the City Manager replied that is correct, and added that the City Attorney and the City Manager spent many hours with BCDC in a long and difficult process. President Corica inquired if it is possible that going through the process again right result in less than what the City has now, and the City Manager agreed that could happen. October 4, 1988 286 The Acting Public Works Director clarified the location of the public access easement for Mrs. Martin. Mr. Kane stated he agreed with Council that the City should not go back to BCDC to redo the process. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 88 -650 Resolution No. 11570 "Approving Alameda Police Association Letter of Understanding." Adopted. Councilmember Thomas stated she took the matter off the Consent Calendar because she believes an agreement with the Union should be done in a more open manner; there was terminology in the letter to Sergeant Garrett that "All safety officers who previously received an initial safety equipment allowance shall receive a one -time sum of $550," and she believes there may be some officers who have been with the City for a long enough period of time that they might not have received any. The Personnel Director stated the allowance is part of what the officers are given for post - academy training so some officers may not remember they were given that amount, and there may be some that may not have received it [prior to the last fifteen years or so]. The City Manager suggested the wording be changed to "All safety officers, currently employed, shall receive a one -time sum of $550." Councilmember Thomas stated she would be more comfortable with that, and moved adoption of the resolution with that change of wording. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote -5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 88 -651 David Plummer, 1401 High Street, commented on the library site issue, reviewed previous site considerations, stated he was distressed by the newspaper article that there would be a new site for the library; cannot see how a site other than the Carnegie Building can be justified economically or as to location; believes if the Carnegie Building is abandoned, there will need to be a bond issue floated; it had at one point been decided the library should be in the Civic Center and he urged Council give exact and strong direction to the Library Board regarding the site selection. Councilmember Thomas stated the site selection has been an ongoing problem; perhaps it is time to have another meeting with the Library Board. Councilmember Camicia agreed there should be another meeting with the Library Board. Councilmember Thomas stated an informal report is needed to update October 4, 1988 28e President Corica nominated Robert O'Maley for reappointment to the Golf Commission. Councilmember Thomas seconded the nomination which was carried by consensus of Council. 88 -682 Councilmember Camicia expressed concern about Federal Bill MR4481 (Base Closure Law) as it relates to the possibility of the Port of Oakland taking Naval Air Station property. Councilmember Camicia stated he would like Council to take some action to impact the process in Washington to protect the City's interest. President Corica stated nothing will be done until January, doubts the Air Station is in jeopardy, but he has called Washington and is on top of the matter. Councilmember Camicia stated he just wants Council to have a plan in place and be ready in case the City must fight. President Corica stated the City is on top of the matter, the Naval Air Station will know of activity in advance, and there will be persons going to Washington if necessary when the matter arises. Councilman Arnerich stated no military base will be closed prior to 1991 and it will be on a phase -out basis. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 88 -683 John Scott Graham, 1728 Tregloan Court, stated he believes there should be eviction limitations, and cited the Art Zone, formerly located in the Times -Star Building, as a case example. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by President Corica at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance, in accordance with the Brown Act.