1988-12-20 Regular CC Minutes351
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY DECEMBER 20, 1988
88-789 The meeting convened at 7:40 p.m. (at the conclusion of the
Community Improvement Commission Meeting) with President Corica
presiding [The Closed Session was held over to a Special Meeting
held December 22, 1988.]
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Monsef and the
invocation was given by Reverend Robert Keller, Tiin Towers United
Methodist Church.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef,
Thomas, and President Corica 5.
Absent: None.
MINUTES
Councilman Arnerich made a motion to approve the minutes of the
Special Council Meeting of November 28, 1988, and the Regular
Council Meeting of December 6, 1988. Councilmember Camicia
seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote:
Regarding November 28, 1988, Meeting: Unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regarding December 6, 1988, as follows: Ayes: Councilmembers
Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas and President Corica - 4. Noes: None.
Absent: None. Abstentions: Councilmember Monsef 1.
[Abstention due to absence from meeting.]
CONSENT CALENDAR
At the request of Councilmember Thomas, Item No. 1-K (See 88-819),
resolution regarding Trails Grant Program Application, was removed
from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda. At the
request of Councilmember Monsef, Item No. 1-D (See 88-815), report
regarding telephone conduit installation, was also removed from the
Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to approve the remainder of the
Consent Calendar. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it
was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
*88-790 From City Manager regarding Annual Report of the Community
Improvement Commission. Accepted.
*88-791 From Acting Public Works Director recommending acceptance
of the work by O.C. Jones & Sons for construction of Independence
Drive and Atlantic Avenue, No. P.W. 4-87-9. Accepted.
*88-792 From Acting Public Works Director recommending acceptance
of the work by O.C. Jones & Sons for construction of Bridge View
Isle Bicycle Staging Area, No. P.W. 5-87-12. Accepted.
*88-793 From Acting Public Works Director recommending acceptance
December 20, 1988
of the improvements and release of bond for Tract 4542
(Woodbridge). Accepted.
*88-794 From Acting Finance Director on City's Investment Portfolio
as of November 31, 1988. Accepted.
RESOLUTIONS
*88-795 Resolution No. 11619 "Adopting plans and specifications
and calling for bids for landscape maintenance of various areas in
the City of Alameda, P.W. 12-88-21 and directing City Clerk to
advertise same." Adopted.
*88-796 Resolution No. 11620 "Awarding contract to Atlas Tree
Service, Inc. for the pruning of City street trees in various
locations in the City of Alameda, No. P.W. 11-88-19, and
authorizing execution thereof." Adopted.
*88-797 Resolution No. 11621 "Approving the application and the
project agreement for history and archeology grant funds for the
Alameda Free Library Preservation Project from the California
Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act of 1988."
Adopted.
*88-798 Resolution No. 11622 "Requesting the Alameda County Board
of Supervisors to permit the County Clerk to render specified
services to the City relating to the conduct of the City of
Alameda's Municipal Election on March 7, 1989." Adopted.
*88-799 Resolution No. 11623 "Approving Parcel Map No. 5434 for
division of property in Alameda Marina Village, permitting
recording thereof, and accepting certain dedicated lands." Adopted.
*88-800 Resolution No. 11624 "Approving Parcel Map No. 5435 for
division of property in Alameda Marina Village, permitting
recording thereof, and accepting certain dedicated easements."
Adopted.
*88-801 Resolution No. 11625 "Ordering the vacation of a portion
of a five-foot wide electrical easement within Lot 5, Tract 3922,
(920 Otis Drive)." Adopted.
*88-802 Resolution No. 11626 "Authorizing execution of agreement
with Pacific Bell for utilities on North Loop Road, Assessment
District 84-4." Adopted.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
*88-803 Ordinance No. 2413, N.S. "Authorizing grant of easement
to East Bay Municipal Utility District to contain a pipeline
adjacent to the eastern line of Webster Street between Atlantic
Avenue and Bethlehem Avenue." (Introduced at Council Meeting of
August 16, 1988) Adopted.
BILLS
*88-804 The List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as
December 20, 1988
correct, was approved in the sum of $1,269,097.69.
**********
RETURN TO REGULAR AGENDA
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
88-805 From L. E. Peters, 1003 Tahiti Lane, regarding personal
safety at Council Meetings.
President Corica noted Mr. Peters suggested persons should not be
required to give their addresses at Council meetings; and stated
that addresses should be written on the speaker slips.
Councilmember Monsef commented the speakers should state in which
city they reside.
President Corica thanked Mr. Peters for bringing the matter to
Council's attention, as it is a very worthwhile suggestion.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the communication.
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-806 From John Barni, Jr., 875 Island Drive, requesting Council
grant an extension to Planned Development PD-86-1.
Mr. Barni stated the Planned Development (PD) was approved on this
parcel; there is a buyer for the property; and requested that
extensions be allowed on PDs as Council loses no jurisdiction as
long as a Tentative Map has not been filed.
Gordon Christopherson, 2807 Marina Drive, requested no further
extensions be granted to Mr. Barni or Mr. King [owner of the
property] regarding this project (PD-86-1); and detailed the
reasons for his request.
President Corica stated a Zoning Ordinance amendment would be
needed for an extension.
Councilmember Thomas stated this PD has been through a lot of
public input, a lot of staff, neighborhood and Planning Board work,
and appears to be a very workable project and an improvement to the
neighborhood; there will be an opportunity for hearings on a
Tentative Map; thinks PDs should be allowed extension in cases
such as this because, otherwise, it would duplicate exactly what
has been done before; and believes an extension is in order.
Councilmember Camicia questioned if an extension is legally
appropriate, to which the City Attorney responded that the
ordinance is quite specific; Council has jurisdiction to amend the
ordinance but not to grant an exception.
Councilman Arnerich questioned time limits.
The City Attorney replied Council could have discretionary action;
December 20, 1988
another option is to require termination if it is found that the
conditions have changed; there could be a cut-off date; and there
could be both a discretionary action and a cut-off date; and if
Council would like to entertain an amendment, Council could request
one from the Planning Board.
Councilmember Thomas noted the length of time and extensions
available on a Tentative Map, and the City Attorney stated that
could be a good period to match.
President Corica stated it appears the best solution would be to
send the matter back to the Planning Board with Council's input,
and note that Council would like to have PD-86-1 extended, but the
Planning Board could discuss the time limit; and noted that
Councilmember Thomas's remarks made sense [regarding extensions and
time available on Tentative Maps].
Councilmember Camicia stated it makes sense to refer the matter
back to the Planning Board for review; the Planning Board when
initially reviewing the PD, produced a good project, and he would
not want to see the PD go through the whole process again, with a
result Council may not at all like; so if Council could have a
little leeway, it makes a lot of sense.
President Corica suggested Council allow the Planning Board to make
the decision regarding the timeframe, direct staff to indicate to
the Planning Board the limits on a Tentative Map so the Board may
consider conforming to those limits, making the timeframe longer,
or other alternatives, and then report back to Council.
The City Attorney stated he believes staff could provide many
options; for example, a request for renewal of extension could be
made to the Planning Board, and there could be no timelines on it,
or perhaps a limitation of not longer than an applicable map;
there are many options and the Planning Board could explore them.
President Corica stated perhaps the City Attorney could write out
some of the suggestions, to which the City Attorney stated he would
be happy to help.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to send this matter back to the
Planning Board and ask them to explore a range of options.
Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-807 From Barbara Edmiston, 1952 Sandcreek Way, requesting
consideration of a more inclusive ordinance requiring spark
arresters on chimneys.
President Corica commented there is a report from the Fire Chief
indicating that the arresters will be mandatory in the near future.
The Fire Chief stated there will be an ordinance for Council
consideration probably on January 17, 1989, Council Meeting Agenda,
which will include provisions that address both combustible roofs
and spark arresters. December 20, 1988
357
considered; the Course should be available to people who cannot
afford a lot of money; the same rates should not be charged as
when the Course is in excellent shape; and expressed appreciation
for the efforts of the Golf Commission.
Councilmember Monsef stated he supports the rate increase;
believes there should be capital improvements including the
clubhouse, etc.; if more capital improvements are made on the
Course, it will bring more money in; with $915,000 in improvements
scheduled for 1989, the reserves will be depleted; Alameda has one
of the best Golf Courses and some of the lowest rates in the area;
and the raise is needed to put the Course in better shape.
Councilmember Monsef moved the Council accept the recommendation of
the Commission. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion.
President Corica stated all projects will not be completed in one
year, and revenue will continue to come in during the time the
improvements will be made.
Councilman Arnerich inquired if Mr. Tillman is opposed to the
increase in both resident and non-resident, to which Mr. Tillman
replied he is opposed.
Councilman Arnerich stated his concern is that he would not want to
avoid an increase this year, only to return in a few years and find
it necessary to make a very large increase.
Mr. Tillman stated fees were raised August, 1985; reserves built
up every year since 1981; when the Bureau of Electricity
established an enterprise fund, the Bureau enlarged its
contribution to the City, from $900,000 to $2,100,000, while the
Golf Course, last year only, gave $27,000; he would approve a Golf
Course raise if the Course would give back money into the City;
suggests the City Attorney review the Gann Act and find out whether
the City qualifies for money to be put back into the City, and
suggests $150,000 a year to the City; and added that no department
in the City has a 50% reserve.
President Corica suggested a surcharge be put on for such items as
the [replacement of the diseased] greens and then remove it when
the work is done; but first spend the reserves to do the work.
The motion was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef, and Thomas - 4. Noes:
President Corica: - 1. Absent: None.
88-811 From City Manager regarding curbside recycling proposal.
Councilmember Monsef stated he would like Council to support this
proposal; the County is putting together a County-wide plan;
although he believes $10,000 is not sufficient funding, it is a
beginning; and moved the Council accept the recommendation.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-812 From Assistant City Manager recommending cablecasting of
December 20, 1988
358
additional Board/Commission meetings.
President Corica stated he believes this is a good idea, and
inquired if there would be any cost other than having an operator
present.
Wilma Johnson, General Manager, United Cable, replied that there
are no problems, if only one more program is added, and as long as
it begins by 7:00 p.m.
Councilman Arnerich inquired if a very special meeting came up,
could there be arrangements for televising, to which Ms. Johnson
stated there would be no problem, but it should be in the Council
Chambers and if possible, a week's notice should be given.
Councilmember Thomas inquired if other Board and Commission
meetings could be substituted for Council Meeting reruns, to which
Ms. Johnson stated that would be easier for United Cable, however,
it would require more time for a City-paid Cable technician.
Councilmember Thomas noted she has talked to students who are
interested in working as interns, they might not cost very much and
might receive credit for the experience; and she is in favor of
telecasting all the Board Meetings possible.
Councilmember Camicia commented he talked to students at Peralta,
and they also are interested in operating the equipment; and an
internship program might be worked out.
President Corica agreed it would be good to explore.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the report and
recommendation. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-813 From Assistant City Manager concerning initiating
discussions with County regarding the possibility of expanding
boundaries of the West End Community Improvement District.
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated he believes the State
law to redevelop blighted areas was intended to help people who
need housing; the expanded District would use more police and fire
services for which the City would pay; and this law should not be
used to benefit certain businesses.
Diane Coler-Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, stated she believes that
expansion of the District will be the first step to revitalizing
Webster Street, and hopes Council will direct staff to proceed with
the concept.
The City Manager explained that the recommendation is only to allow
discussion with the County and some experts in redevelopment, to
find out what the benefits can be to the area, the City, and the
merchants; and the tax benefits come back to the County and the
City from the increased level of improvements.
Councilmember Thomas stated she agrees with Mr. Scullin that a
December 20, 1988
President Corica stated the proper course of action would be to
accept the written communication and inform Ms. Edmiston when this
is going to be agendized.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the communication.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
88-808 From Chairman, Mayor's Committee for the Handicapped,
concerning accessibility problems at the William Paden School.
President Corica commented there is a possibility the school may be
changed from an adult school to a grade school, but access for
handicapped is essential, and Council should express its concern.
Councilman Arnerich stated it appears the work may be completed
soon.
The City Manager stated the work will probably be finished by the
end of December.
Councilman Arnerich made a motion to accept the report and
recommendation. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it
was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-809 From Chairman, Historical Advisory Commission, regarding
renaming of the Portola Triangle.
Don Roberts, 880 Portola Avenue, stated Gideon Auginbaugh has
sufficiently been honored by having a street on Harbor Bay Isle
named after him; one of his neighbors, Sharon LaCroix Snider,
suggested the name Neptune Meadow, if the name must be changed;
and he believes that has more historic significance than Auginbaugh
Meadow [the recommended name].
Gertrude Woods, 1247 Sherman Street, gave historical background of
Portola, governor of Baja, California, in 1769, and the first
European to discover San Francisco Bay; and stated Mr.
Aughinbaugh's name has been memorialized on Bay Farm Island.
Councilmember Camicia commented Mr. Roberts' and Mrs. Woods'
statements make sense and perhaps Council should request the
Historical Advisory Commission to review the matter again.
President Corica stated perhaps Council should decide to leave it
as it is.
Councilman Arnerich stated when a name is established, it remains
the same to most people, and believes the name Portola Triangle
will always be used by citizens; Mr. Aughinbaugh has a street
named after him; the name Portola should not be removed; and
moved to retain the name Portola Triangle. Councilmember Monsef
seconded the motion.
December 20, 1988
Councilmember Thomas noted it would be good to remember the name
Neptune in the future, perhaps when building a park.
The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-810 From Alameda Golf Commission concerning proposed increases
in Golf Course Fees.
Charles Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt, stated he is opposed to the
proposed raise of fees; it has been stated by the Golf Commission
Chairman that there is too much play, meaning possibly there is too
much money; in the seventies, there was a drive to bring people to
the golf course and now financial barriers are being put up to keep
people out; he believes a disservice is being done by raising
rates, and the Golf Superintendent should not have problems
maintaining the Golf Course despite the total amount of plays
anticipated.
Paul Aragon, 350 Laguna Vista, Chairman of Golf Commission, stated
the proposal submitted is the same as submitted in September, with
the exception of a change in the weekend rates for non-residents
from $9 to $8 after 3:00 p.m.; the Commission does not believe
there will be much, if any, negative impact on the play in Alameda
by the change in price; and discussed the need for higher fees to
offset loss of play on the Fry Course during the period when
diseased grass is replaced.
President Corica inquired why nothing has been done when there is a
million dollars in the Enterprise fund, and is available to take
care of emergency situations.
Councilman Arnerich commented one area of concern to him is the
restrooms which have been unsightly for many years; he can
understand the concern of persons such as Mr. Tillman, that there
is an abundance of money, over one million dollars, in the fund,
and yet there is a crash program [for raise in rates].
The Golf Commission Chairman stated the philosophy of the
Commission was to get the money first and handle the projects
second.
Councilmember Monsef stated that, at a recent Golf Commission
meeting, it was noted $500,000 in reserves would be a sufficient
amount, and he has asked for a formula to be developed to show that
$500,000 is a sufficient reserve, as he believes it is not.
The Golf Commission Chairman replied it was the former Finance
Director's opinion that $500,000 was the amount necessary to meet
the expenses for a six-month period, assuming no revenue coming in.
President Corica stated with 1.3 million dollars in the bank and
$200,000 profit projected for each year, he does not understand why
emergency items such as the greens are not being made a priority;
restrooms are in bad condition and Silband should be approached
about that; he is not sure raising rates is the formula that will
take care of the Golf Course; if, after correcting problems, the
income is not maintained, then a raise in rates could be
December 20, 1988
359
need is created for additional services on undeveloped land,
however, Webster Street already uses those services extensively,
and the need might actually be reduced, but must be reviewed.
Councilman Arnerich stated, as this is for discussion only, at this
time, he sees no reason for not exploring all the possibilities.
President Corica agreed.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the recommendation.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-814 From Planning Director regarding a Zoning Ordinance
amendment concerning building heights.
President Corica gave the background of the matter.
The City Attorney commented that there is a Supreme Court opinion
that states you cannot limit occupancy based on members of the
family, therefore many homes are divided into many bedrooms and
rented out; and he suggests the parking regulations be looked
into.
Councilman Arnerich discussed "granny flats."
President Corica stated staff should address the parking issue
also.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the recommendation
with the City Attorney's comments [to explore the parking
regulations]. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-815 From Acting Public Works Director recommending acceptance of
the work by Triple S Electric for construction of Telephone Conduit
Installation on Shore Line Drive, No. P.W. 5-88-8.
Councilmember Monsef stated he removed the item from the Consent
Calendar because he received many calls from the neighborhood about
the telephones, he referred the calls to the City Manager, and he
would like to know the status.
The City Manager responded the work was to install the conduit
only, telephones were to be installed on the beach for emergencies;
there were concerns about misuse of phones, therefore no phones can
receive incoming calls, and in one location there is a call box
which dials only the police.
Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the report.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
RESOLUTIONS
88-816 Resolution No. Urging retention of KQEC (Channel 32)
by United Cable Television Corporation. (Matter continued from
December 20, 1988
December 6, 1988 Council Meeting). Disapproved.
Councilmember Camicia stated he would abstain as he works for KQED.
Frederick Friedman, Advocates for 32/60, 348 Estabrook Street, San
Leandro, requested Council vote in favor of a resolution to request
Cable consider preserving educational channels; stated individuals
do not have much influence with Cable; Councils of Foster City,
San Leandro, and Hayward have adopted similar resolutions;
handicapped people, senior citizens, and persons with physical and
mobility problems rely on Cable for educational programming, and
cannot necessarily be strong spokesmen for themselves.
Wilma Johnson, General Manager, United Cable, stated Channel 32 was
considered to be least frequently watched in a random phone
sampling survey; Cable carries, and intends to carry, three
educational channels, and believes that is adequate.
Councilmember Thomas stated she does not know how much of the
company's profit can be requested for dedication to public interest
programs; government access channels and other community interest
programs are provided; surveys should be conducted to see what the
people do not want; and she will vote no.
Councilman Arnerich noted there is nothing Council can do beyond
the resolution.
Councilmember Thomas made a motion to disapprove the resolution.
Councilmember Monsef seconded the notion, and it was carried by the
following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Monsef,
Thomas, and President Corica - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None.
Abstentions: Councilmember Camicia - 1.
88-817 Resolution No. "Affirming the City of Alameda's
commitment to Fair Housing Rights and Opportunities and encouraging
rental property owners to give tenants reasons for terminating
occupancy." Failed.
Anthony Bradford, Oakland, stated he lived in Alameda six years,
was given five days notice; came to City Council, received some
help but had to get rid of furniture and a lot of things; there
are many homeless; urged Council give people the right they
deserve, to know why they receive notice; and not need to go
through his experience.
Clayton Guyton, 457 Buena Vista Avenue, stated it is important for
a person to be notified why they are given notice, particularly if
they must go to court, and urged Council to look at what this
measure will do.
Felix Seidler, 2527 Santa Clara Avenue, stated he supports the
staff recommendation but the proposed ordinance does not identify
the real abuse to be cured; the draft ordinance as proposed
creates additional causes of action for people to sue each other,
and takes money out of housing and places it in other programs.
John Barni, Sr., 1380 East Shore, stated he does not believe the
December 20, 1988
361
City should take action stronger than what the State allows.
Councilmember Camicia stated the ordinance needs work; the
resolution makes good sense, it positions Council with State and
federal civil rights guidelines, opposes arbitrary eviction,
encourages owners to provide tenants with information about their
rights as tenants, and sends a message that owners should not abuse
tenants; and, tenants should not abuse owners either.
Councilmember Monsef inquired what the history is on complaints on
these issues to the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
The Community Development Director stated the Committee's charge by
the Council was to investigate rent gouging, therefore it primarily
addresses rental increases, and does not address eviction cases.
Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut, stated there are few complaints to the
Rent Review Advisory Committee and he believes the problem is that
the Committee has no powers, and tenants believe it is a wasted
effort to present their cases.
Councilmember Monsef stated he does not believe the Council should
set a policy to get involved in a private matter between landlord
and tenant; there are State laws that protect; and believes this
is simply further control by government, which he will not support.
Councilmember Thomas noted this resolution encourages posting
information and inquired if failure to post would create a defense
to unlawful detainer, to which the City Attorney and Mr. Seidler
both responded they did not believe so.
The City Attorney noted that the ordinance contains three sections
on the law and eight or nine on enforcement, there is nothing
substantive to it; and if the City stated there could only be
eviction for certain causes, that would be altering real property
law.
Mr. Seidler reviewed evictions in Alameda County, noting the
average case costs $2500, and the vast majority of evictions are
for non-payment of rent.
Councilmember Thomas stated she did not believe posting tenants'
rights will gain very much.
President Corica stated that the Council is being asked to go
further than State and federal law, the Civil Rights Act and the
Fair Housing Act; Council is not skirting State or federal law;
there are 14 cities in the County and it is his understanding none
have this type of resolution and he is not sure it is necessary.
Councilmember Camicia stated the resolution addresses civil rights
in the first paragraph, arbitrary eviction in the second paragraph,
and tenants' and landlords fair operation with each other in the
third; believes it is a good resolution, has nothing to do with
rent control and allows people some sense of responsibility; and
moved adoption of the resolution.
December 20, 1988
Councilmember Thomas stated she does not believe this is a matter
of civil rights but it is asking landlords to become attorneys for
the tenants, advising them of their rights; and added it might
make Council feel good but it does nothing to affect the housing
needs in the City.
Councilmember Camicia commented he believes it sends a message.
Councilman Arnerich stated if it is not going to do any good, there
does not seem to be anything more to do than to maintain the
standards set forth with the State and the federal.
The notion failed for lack of a second.
88-818 Resolution No. 11627 "Authorizing execution of Underwriters
Agreement between the City of Alameda and Stone & Youngberg for
Mello-Roos financing." Adopted.
Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
88-819 Resolution No. 11628 "Amending Resolution No. 11562 by
adding Paragraphs 3 and 4." Adopted.
Councilmember Thomas stated she did not recall seeing the
application form referred to in the resolution, to which the City
Manager replied that the assurances were provided in the
information that went to Council with the prior resolution; and
the assurance was that the City would operate and maintain this
property in perpetuity; and the cost would be approximately $5000
a year.
Councilmember Thomas made a motion to adopt the resolution.
Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES
88-820 Ordinance No. 2414, N.S. "Amending Title XVII of the
Alameda Municipal Code to establish short term parking meters in
front of 1222 Park Street (Bernardi Cleaners)." Adopted.
Councilmember Camicia made a motion to adopt the ordinance.
Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
John Barni, Sr. 1380 East Shore Drive, inquired what would happen
to Park Street if everyone requested 12 minute parking.
President Corica replied they would apparantly need to go before
the Traffic Advisory Committee, which would analyze the requests to
see what was needed.
The Acting Public Works Director stated that was the procedure in
this natter.
December 20, 1988
363
NEW BUSINESS
88-821 Councilmember Thomas requested staff to prepare a report on
an independent, more formalized procedure for handling employee
complaints on issues such as discrimination and harassment; there
needs to be an opportunity to resolve such problems.
Councilman Arnerich stated he believed there was a procedure in
affect in the City.
Councilmember Thomas stated she believes the present procedure is
good but there needs to be something more; there needs to be
someone, perhaps with expertise in the community, with a degree in
psychology or social welfare who can donate time, but someone who
is independent; and there needs to be a minority focal point and a
process of appeal.
The Personnel Director explained the procedure currently used and
noted investigations that have taken place; and cautioned that
when the matter is delegated, by law, confidentiality and
non-stigmatizing either party is of great importance; and the
City's policy is modeled after Alameda County.
President Corica requested a survey of neighboring cities'
employee-complaint procedures, and when they were established.
88-822 Councilmember Camicia requested the Kibel, Green, Inc.,
report on the Port of Oakland, and a brief analysis thereof.
The City Manager noted he has a copy on file and will produce it.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL
88-823 John Barni, Sr. commented the City should collect transfer
tax on the sale by Bay Farm Island developers, of certain
interests, to Japanese companies; and commented the City should do
more to assist the Park Street and Webster Street business
districts.
Councilmember Thomas reviewed the background of the matter of
transfers at Harbor Bay Isle, noted the City received the $80,000
due the City of Alameda last year, there was work done by the
former Finance Director and the City Attorney regarding assessing
transfer tax due on past transfers; and the subject of transfer
taxes has not been forgotten.
88-824 Gerhard Degemann, submitted an article from "The California
Executive" regarding the Southern Crossing and Bay Area traffic, to
Council; and commended Council for progress made during the past
year.
88-825 Don Roberts commended the Acting Public Works Director for
the quick and efficient action to correct the height of dunes, and
a storm drain problem at the foot of 9th Street.
88-826 Dave Plummer commented on Item 1-C, Consent Calendar,
regarding Bridge View Isle Bicycle Staging Area, that there are
December 20, 1988
3"
problems at the Bay Farm Island Bridge with the net and the
barrier; and that the area under the bridge should be lighted.
88-827 Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated he believes Lloyd
Hurwitz, the newly elected Chairman of the Strategic Planning
Committee, is in favor of promoting a bridge from the foot of
Broadway to Bay Farm Island.
ADJOURNMENT
88-828 The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. by President Corica
in memory of Theodore Anderson, a dedicated principal at Island
High School.
Respectfully submitted,
DIANE B. FELSCH, CIVIC
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in
accordance with the Brown Act.
December 20, 1988