Loading...
1989-03-14 Adjourned Regular CC Minutes13 9 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY MARCH 14, 1989 89 -156 The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Closed Session to discuss Fischl v. City of Alameda, Chancy v. City of Alameda, and acquisition of the Linoaks Motel; and the Alameda Sewer Improvement Financing Corporation Meeting) with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Reverend Doug Henderson gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Thomas and President Corica - 5. Absent: None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY Camicia. Monsef, 89 -157 Proclamation designating March 1989 as Association for Retarded Citizens - Mental Retardation Awareness Month in Alameda. President Corica read the proclamation and Betsy Bongiovanni, 3201 Thompson Street, accepted the framed copy of the proclamation on behalf of the Association, and expressed appreciation for the recognition of the Association's work. MINUTES Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the minutes of the Special Council Meeting of February 14, 1989 and the Regular Council Meeting of February 21, 1989. Councilmember Thomas stated she will abstain regarding the 14th. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Regarding the Special Council Meeting of February 14, 1989, Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia, Monsef, and President Corica - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstentions: Councilmember Thomas - 1 [due to absence]. Regarding the Regular Council Meeting of February 21, 1989, the motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Robert DeCelle, 276 Beach Road, requested Report and Recommendation, Item No. 1 -A (See 89 -180), regarding the Five Year Plan for the Administration of Paratransit Programs, be removed for discussion. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 1 -A, described in the above paragraph. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. March 14, 1989 RESOLUTIONS *89 -158 Resolution No. 11669 "Authorizing to develop a Request for Proposal to renovate the 18 greens on the Earl Fry Golf Course." Adopted. *89 -159 Resolution No. 11670 "Declaring canvass of returns and results of Consolidated Municipal Election held on Tuesday, March 7, 1989." Adopted. Whole number of votes cast: 12,254 Total number of votes for each candidate: For office of Councilmember: A.J. "Lil" Arnerich 6,388 Bill Withrow 5,499 Hadi Monsef 3,299 Diane Coler -Dark 3,296 George Gadsby 2,060 Walt Smith 902 Clayton Guyton 683 For office of Auditor: Kevin W. Harper 5,391 Robert H. Lofstrand 4,304 For office of Treasurer: Lewis E. Hurwitz 5,797 W. Alfred "Al" Hartman, Jr. 4,082 For Member of the Board of Education: Donald R. MacDowell 7,994 Barbara Rasmussen 7,864 William C. "Bill" Garvine 6,730 Total number of votes cast for Bond Measures: Measure A - School District Bonds [School land acquisition, construction and improvements] Yes 8039 No 3802 Passed. Measure B - School District Bonds [Kofman Auditorium, repair /remodeling] Yes 7213 No 4471 Not Passed. Total number of votes cast for Charter Amendments: Measure C - Compensation for Councilmembers Yes 3494 No 7359 Not Passed. Measure D - Filling Vacant Council Seats Yes 6493 No 4569 Passed. Measure E - Removal of Auditor /Treasurer Offices Yes 4485 No 6211 Not Passed. Measure F - Establishing Historical Advisory Board Yes 6470 No 4036 Passed. Total number of votes cast for one percent tax: Measure G - Tax of one percent of value of structure for which building /plumbing permits are issued. [For Police /Fire/ Medical Facilities fund] Yes 7437 No 4028 Not Passed. Votes by precinct are attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. March 14, 1989 *89 -160 Resolution No. 11671 "Authorizing execution of revised agreement with Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and approving Alameda's share of storm drain non -point source control evaluation program." Adopted. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *89 -161 Ordinance No. 2422 N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending various sections of Chapter 1, Title XI, thereof, relating to regulations for industrial districts." Adopted. *89 -162 Ordinance No. 2423 N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending certain sections of Chapter 3 of Title XVII thereof pertaining to parking enforcement holidays." Adopted. BILLS *89 -163 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as correct, was approved in the sum of $909,447.37. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 89 -164 From Owen J. Hope and Adele B. Hope, requesting the Food Bank relocation be made a priority matter. Ed Dankworth, 1221 Porta Ballena, Member, Mastick Senior Center Advisory Board, stated the needs of the Food Bank are continually expanding; space is needed, and suggested Council encourage participation in the search for a new location for the Food Bank. Owen Hope, 1512 Bay Street, requested the Food Bank be relocated as soon as possible to a non - residential site, and its present location be deemed unsuitable; the Food Bank was moved in without notice, parking and constant activity is a heavy burden for a residential block. Vince Luczak, 3232 Calhoun Street, Alameda Emergency Food, stated a neighborhood study had been made, and there are efforts to relocate the Food Bank, and Council has been cooperative regarding needs. President Corica inquired if there are figures regarding the space needed, to which Mr. Luczak replied 3000 to 7000 square feet are necessary. Councilman Arnerich inquired how much space is presently utilized at Mastick Senior Center, to which Mr. Luczak responded he believes approximately 2500 square feet are in use. President Corica stated Council would appreciate having information relayed to the Council or Food Bank, from anyone, regarding available space to accommodate the Food Bank either permanently or long -term temporary. March 14, 1989 Councilmember Thomas stated $50,000 was allocated last year from CDBG funds, those monies have been tied up for a year, and now may be tied up for another year; a timeframe should be set; if the Food Bank cannot find a relocation, for $50,000, there are vacant stores throughout the business districts that could be leased; she would like a report on what the mitigations are; residents should not be burdened by what was to be, in 1984, a temporary situation. Councilmember Camicia agreed with Councilmember Thomas; and stated a new location is difficult to find, but that does not mean that the Food Bank should not comply with the various requirements in place when the Food Bank moved into the present location, and a report back is a good idea. President Corica stated the $50,000 allocated was to be used for relocation, it is difficult to find a place, but understands there are problems for residents in the area where the Food Bank is now located. Councilmember Thomas stated she would like a report on what kind of sites have been looked at, and what kinds of mitigations are being requested. Councilmember Monsef discussed with the Recreation Manager the timeframe for completion of the renovation of the Mastick Senior Center, and the relocation of the Food Bank. The Recreation Manager commented that many sites for the Food Bank have been reviewed, but none are affordable or workable. Councilmember Camicia commented that the City Manager had noted there is some warehouse space that may soon be available. President Corica stated when the senior housing is built, the overall situation would be affected; and a permanent solution must be found. Councilman Arnerich stated the Food Bank's location was to be temporary, but five years have passed; the Food Bank has been attempting to relocate with no progress; the Mastick Senior Center is attempting to complete its renovation by 1990, and staff recommendation is that the Food Bank be given a relocation time -line of June 30, 1990; there is compassion for the Food Bank but something must be done; and he is looking at a timeframe of March, 1990, or no later than June 30, 1990, for the Food Bank to relocate. President Corica suggested an advertisement be placed in the newspaper, three times, for available space for the Food Bank. Mr. Luczak noted that the Food Bank has also been looking at vacant land, and with community development funds, could perhaps place mobile office -type buildings on vacant land. Councilmember Camicia stated he agreed with President Corica March 14, 1989 regarding advertising, with Councilman Arnerich regarding a timeframe, and with Councilmember Thomas about taking action regarding mitigation measures, and moved that all of those items be incorporated into a future report. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -165 From Joyce Smith, regarding dangerous traffic conditions at the corner of Buena Vista Avenue and Poggi Street. President Corica commented that the matter has been discussed by the Traffic Advisory Committee who passed a motion to install a school crossing sign for the intersection and to concentrate on police enforcement in the area; and the sign has already been installed. Councilman Arnerich made a motion to accept the written communication. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -166 From Harry C. Cordon, President, Clipper Cove Homeowners' Association, concerning the Costa Brava development. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the written communication. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -167 From Wayne T. Pearce, Alameda, regarding Doric Construction's proposed Ferry Terminal and time periods of future projects. President Corica commented that additional public hearings will be held for citizen input on the issue. Councilmember Thomas made a motion to accept the written communication. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -168 From Donald and Lee Kirby, Alameda, regarding determination of number of units at 2063 San Antonio Avenue. Mr. Kirby commented that he had provided information and an affidavit from a former owner of the property in question; noted the division of the property into units occurred in 1935 -37 and the appliances still in the house are reflective of its age. President Corica discussed, with Mr. Kirby, the evidence regarding the four units, City records prior to 1952, etc. Councilman Arnerich stated the man who signed the affidavit regarding the fourth unit was only five to seven years old at the time the fourth unit was claimed to have been added. President Corica stated Mr. Arnerich had a very good point. March 14, 1989 Mr. Kirby stated he has a copy of the cancelled check which was made in payment for the bill the City claims was not paid. Emmet Steen, 1616 San Antonio, a contracter who worked on the house, stated there was no question the house contained four units. Councilmember Monsef discussed building permits for the remodeling that was done. Councilmember Camicia inquired if there was a ruling when application was made for a building permit, to which Mr. Steen replied the City Building Inspectors stated there were four units. Councilmember Thomas questioned whether the bill [mentioned in paragraph 5 above] was paid by the check Mr. Kirby brought in, and the City Manager responded he would review the cancelled check. Councilmember Thomas stated she is concerned that the records regarding the bill were very recent yet may be incorrect; discussed an experience tracing units during which it was found the assessor's related records were incorrect; perhaps another mechanism for dating the units would be the utilities; believes this situation is worth looking at as she cannot see punishing Mr. Kirby for an assumption the City has made, and believes Council should physically examine the premises. Councilmember Thomas stated, she suspects the County Assessor, in 1952, had better records than the City, and did a diligent job, but that there were some errors in his survey. The City Manager commented there is a possibility that what Councilmember Thomas and what Mr. Kirby are stating is correct, but Council decided on the necessity of positive records and procedurally, he believes more positive evidence should be provided. Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, stated the child who was five to seven years old in the thirties remained in the house through 1962, and would have known if the building took place; and spoke of her experience with conversions, and does not believe the County Assessor's rolls or the City's past records, were correct. Councilman Arnerich stated that certain mitigating factors seem to have entered into the matter tonight, including the check which needs review, suggested the matter be put over for further study; and suggested the person who signed the affidavit could perhaps supply names of persons living in the unit in question. Further discussion ensued regarding presentation of evidence; original fixtures that still remain in the building, and the Building Inspectors' reviews. Councilman Arnerich suggested the matter be postponed until further information can be obtained. March 14, 1989 Councilmember Thomas suggested the written communication be accepted and a report with further information be provided at the April 4 meeting. Councilmember Camicia stated the neighbors have not complained and perhaps Council should allow Mr. Kirby the fourth unit. Councilman Arnerich inquired if Mr. Kirby would be agreeable to further information being provided in April, and Mr. Kirby responded affirmatively. President Corica stated he was concerned about setting a precedent. Councilman Arnerich stated that he would like to move, to be fair to Mr. Kirby and the citizens, to put this matter over to the April 4th Council meeting. Councilmember Thomas inquired if the Acting City Attorney believes Council can act under a written communication. 89 -169 President Corica introduced Bruce Quan, Jr. as Interim City Attorney. Mr. Quan stated his appreciation of the opportunity to serve. RETURN TO PARAGRAPH 89 -168 In response to Councilmember Thomas's question, stated he would like to reserve judgment to provide a definitive answer. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion, which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. HEARINGS 89 -170 Consideration of proposed Negative Declaration, IS- 88 -21, proposed Rezoning, R -88 -8, and General Plan Amendment, GPA -88 -2, for a parcel located at 475 Santa Clara Avenue from R -2, Two Family Residence District to C -1, Neighborhood Business District. Applicant: Mira Lee for William Mah. (Continued from February 21, 1989.) Held over. Written Communication from Millie R. Boomer, Alameda, regarding Applicant's request for rezoning of property at 475 Santa Clara Avenue. President Corica announced that this matter is being pulled from the agenda because of the Court's recent decision regarding subdivision maps, with the result that Council cannot approve zoning changes for 120 days; this matter will, therefore, be heard at the end of 120 days; informed the prospective speaker, Dan McEachern, that the matter would be publicized and he may speak at that time; the person who submitted the related written March 14, 1989 communication will be notified; and the related ordinance (89 -185) and resolution, (89 -178) will be heard at the same time. 89 -171 Consideration of conversion within certain Underground Utility Districts (Phase 3) (Districts No. 10 through No. 20). (Continued from February 21, 1989.) President Corica explained the procedure of the hearing. The Acting Public Works Director presented the background of the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, the following spoke.: Christopher Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Avenue. Wesley Jensen, 2615 Encinal Avenue. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street. On the call for opponents, there were none. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Monsef stated other cities are doing undergrounding; it is good for the City and he supports it; the issue is who should pay for it, or what division of cost should be made between the individual and the City, and he would like a representative of the Bureau of Electricity to address the subject. The Engineering Manager, Bureau of Electricity commented that Districts 1 through 9 have already been approved by Council; noted guidelines followed; and, the average cost for homeowners in the recently completed area on Island Drive was $1,150 per homeowner. Council discussed the cost of installation with the Engineering Manager. Councilmember Monsef stated Council should move ahead with undergrounding, set a limit of $1,000 per residence, and the balance of the cost should be absorbed by the Bureau of Electricity or the City; and moved that the undergrounding go ahead, and the cost per residence should not exceed $1000. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion. President Corica stated he would like to see the entire City undergrounded, however this is an older City and $1,000 is a large amount of money to tell people they must spend because the City wants undergrounding; he would like to see the option in effect where all costs are paid by the City and then assessed as a lien to be collected with taxes and stretched out so it will not be too much of a burden; and if the property is sold prior to full payment, then the remaining portion of the unpaid bill would be picked up by the new owner. March 14, 1989 Councilmember Monsef discussed the possiblity of the Bureau of Electricity undergrounding the entire City and then put the expense into the rate base as long as it does not exceed the P. G. & E. rates. Councilmember Camicia commented he believes there would be many residents willing to pay $1000 for undergrounding, knowing their property values would increase. Councilman Arnerich stated Council is concerned with the financial state of residents; and he supports the motion for $1000 for the homeowner with the City incurring the remainder. Councilmember Thomas stated Council is allowing people to pay $1000, after "allowing" them to pay up to $5000 for sewer laterals, and payment for a higher quality fire - retardant roof, Measure A [School Bond] just passed with a one percent tax increase; some persons spoke last time this matter came before Council, and gave good reasons why they did not want undergrounding; undergrounding is a nice concept especially with new construction, and is concerned that a sense of aesthetics is being substituted for health, safety and welfare, and she cannot support this without findings that these are the high- incident poles that are hit; could support the Bureau funding the entryways to Alameda, however the Bureau has just raised its rates. President Corica agreed with Councilmember Camicia that removing the poles in front of properties would increase property value, but is concerned about senior citizens on fixed incomes; and is concerned with placing an imposition on people who may not be able to pay, and perhaps there could be a program whereby the City could share the burden. Councilman Arnerich agreed with President Corica, stated the Council should be consistent with what has been done in the nine previous districts that were undergrounded. President Corica stated he has not heard complaints about undergrounding costs prior to the hearing regarding District No. 10, and stated he would like to see the matter come back and a funding program investigated that could make it easier for . residents to pay. Councilmember Monsef stated he believes it may be a hardship to some but it will make property values go up; because Council set a policy to underground, created assessment districts, and nine districts have been assessed, Council should go ahead with this one, and direct staff to go ahead with a long -term plan with the help of the Bureau regarding how the City can be undergrounded over the next twenty or thirty years; but in the meantime, it would not be fair to change the current policy at this point. At the request of the City Manager, the motion was clarified by Councilmember Monsef that the residents would pay up to $1000 and March 14, 1989 the balance paid by the City or the Bureau of Electricity. Following further request for clarification on whom will pay the balance, during which a preference was stated that the Bureau of Electricity pay the balance, the City Manager noted the Bureau has its own budget on which the Public Utilities Board would determine costs; and he suggested Council specify that the Board hear this matter, and look toward including that in their budget next year. The motion was changed accordingly, and was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia and Monsef - 3. Noes: Councilmember Thomas and President Corica - 2. Absent: None. 89 -172 Resolution No. 11672 "Establishing Underground Utility Districts Nos. 10 through 20 at various locations in the City of Alameda. (Continued from February 21, 1989, Council Meeting.) Councilmember Monsef moved adoption. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arnerich, Camicia and Monsef - 3. Noes: Councilmember Thomas and President Corica - 2. Absent: None. 89 -173 Consideration of establishment of a Community Facilities District, authorization to levy special taxes pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982; consideration of the proposed debt issue and final determination of whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the issuance of bonds of the District for the Communities Facility District. President Corica opened the public hearing and announced that the developers requested this matter be held over to the next Council Meeting so that there may be further discussion. The City Manager added that the property owner requested the continuation of this matter to permit modification to include a prepayment option on the Mello Roos bonds for the individual property owners, and the continuation will allow staff to review the option and make a recommendation to Council. Councilmember Thomas moved Item No. 12, regarding Capital Improvement Projects be taken out of order, so that the interested young people present would not need to wait longer. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -174 From Recreation and Parks Director concerning the prioritizing of Capital Improvement Projects for potential development by Measure AA Funds. * Written Communications: From Florence Garrett and Maurice Garrett, Alameda, March 14, 1989 7 9 opposing construction of a Class A baseball field at Godfrey Park. * From Ed and Kathryn Embree, Alameda, opposing conversion of Godfrey Park into a baseball field. * From Mr. and Mrs. Fred Bush, Alameda, objecting to proposed development of a soccer field at Holly Street and Oleander. Jeri Kindle, 323 Maitland Drive, stated children play at Godfrey Park; it is a safe place to play; many young families live in the area; and she does not want a baseball park located there. Alfred Gaspar, 200 Maitland Drive, stated he is strictly against a Class A ballpark facility; it will bring nothing but problems; if Council wants a ballpark, it should be at some other location. Councilman Arnerich inquired if Mr. Gaspar has any objections to the baseball diamond as it currently is, to which Mr. Gaspar replied he would like the diamond kept the way it is now because it is for the children who want to be at the park. Charles Clay, 1414 Seminary Avenue, submitted a letter reflecting his statement; stated he objects to converting a neighborhood park into a large scale baseball facility; there could be parking problems; he appreciates the large grassy area for any activities; thanked Council for the notification of the proposal. Robert Carlson, 130 Dahlia Drive, requested a definition of a Class A baseball field. Councilman Arnerich stated the list contained in the report is simply a priority listing of proposed projects; and he believes, in essence, a Class A facility is one perceived to be a first -class baseball facility similar to the ones at Laney College and the San Leandro Ballpark. Mr. Carlson asked further questions and the Recreation and Park Director responded he cannot speak for the Recreation Commission whose recommendation will come before Council in April; there is proposed parking at the end of Seminary Street for 35 -40 cars, a proposed fence approximately 10 or 15 feet high, and locking of the facility when not in use; Class A is a high quality facility; and discussed bleachers and the location of home plate. A brief discussion ensued concerning which teams would be playing on the field, and it was concluded that there would be approximately fifteen teams eligible to play on the field. Alta Lee Rose, 321 Maitland Drive, stated her concern is the traffic that will be coming into the area if there is a Class A ballpark facility. Loretta Pozos, 318 Beach Road, stated concerns expressed tonight, March 14, 1989 8 were expressed in 1985 to the Recreation Commission; the proposed plan is not appropriate for the neighborhood, which is strictly residential, has narrow streets, inadequate parking; and residents do not want a fenced diamond, night lighting, permanent concession stands which bring trash to surroundings, 700 - person capacity bleachers, or parking at the end of a narrow street. Suzanne Weilepp, 210 Beach Road, stated the reason she moved to the area was because of Godfrey Park; when the children are at the park, neighbors are watching and aware of any strangers. Larry Perry, 39 Garden Road, agreed with Ms. Pozos, and added that if the Class A facility is installed at Godfrey Park, many children will be displaced. Michelle Haberstroh, 250 Beach Road, stated her four children play at the park every day it does not rain; they help the custodian who cleans the park; there are activities for parents and children at the park; and there should be a park director. Councilman Arnerich noted that there will probably be a playground director at Godfrey Park this summer. Joseph Haberstroh, 250 Beach Road, stated everyone in the neighborhood does not want a Class A facility at Godfrey Park, and as taxpayers and homeowners, the residents should have some right to say what is in the park. Florence Garrett, 246 Beach Road, stated only a select few could play in a fenced -in area, but little children, and older persons, should be able to use the park; she does not want the noise, lights, traffic, or diminishing value of the residential property that would be connected with a Class A ballpark facility, and submitted a letter from a neighbor. Bennett Erdahl, 247 Beach Road, agreed with what was stated by other speakers, and suggested installing a swim center which could be used by everyone. Ruth Bigelow, 330 Beach Road, stated she is a licensed child care provider and takes her little children to Godfrey Park, but would not be able to take them there if the park is changed as proposed. Harold Perry, 307 Beach Road, stated the park was built by taxpayers' money and that means the public should always be able to use it and it should never be taken out of the hands of the public. Ronald Bigelow, 330 Beach Road, stated Godfrey Park is a community park; a Class A ballpark would only be for a special interest group; the area for the children and other activities would be reduced; parking is insufficient; with added traffic, the fire equipment could not come in; suggested building a Class A facility in an area where there can be growth, for tennis courts and other activity. March 14, 1989 8 Robert DeCelle, 276 Beach Road, agreed with speakers, and stated he hopes when Council considers the subject, that the first choice will be the Harbor Bay Park and Soccer Field at Holly; and he does not want to have Godfrey Park changed. Robert Gaspar, 200 Maitland Drive, stated Lincoln Park and Washington Park were improved; games in the past were played at those parks, and if it was good enough then, it is now; and people do not want the Class A ballpark facility at Godfrey Park. President Corica commented the people have made themselves heard; and he does not feel comfortable having a part in cutting off children from using the area. Councilmember Camicia stated he understands this is an informational report only, and it might make sense to send a message to the Recreation Commission that perhaps Washington Park or Lincoln Park can be refurbished to provide what the Commission wants to accomplish; and noted that the report checklist is outstanding. Councilmember Thomas stated she likes the suggestion to look at alternatives; neighborhood parks should be neighborhood; Encinal High School already has a locked up area which has a number of things required for a Class A facility, for example, a fenced -in park with bleachers, off - street parking, a better - than - average playing field, etc.; and instead of having a Willie Stargell Field, it would be a Willie Stargell Class A facility and would pay tribute to Willie Stargell and provide a better home field for the high school teams; disagrees with a gymnasium for the park at Harbor Bay Isle; noted 700+ chldren play soccer this year; believes a facility is needed for three or four regulation -size soccer fields at the new park at Harbor Bay Isle; does not believe in building a gymnasium or a Class A facility, which will promote transients, without providing for all of the impacts; believes Council should go ahead with some development of the park at Harbor Bay Isle, a couple of other items, and a Class A facility at the Willie Stargell Field. Councilman Arnerich agreed that Councilmember Thomas is correct that there are very limited land uses in town; the ball field at Encinal High School is not used because of the grading problem, it is away from residential area and is a possibility; understands application will be made the first year for $869,000 for the first phase; Measure AA funds cannot be used for the gymnasium nor the McKinley Park Childcare Center; if the Commission is looking toward applying for the first $869,000, perhaps they are considering going ahead with the Harbor Bay Isle Park Site and the Holly /Oleander Soccer Field. Councilmember Monsef stated he does not believe the Class A Baseball Facility is right for Godfrey Park, and secondly he questions whether a soccer field at Holly and Oleander is also a possibility; he would like to see that further explored. March 14, 1989 82 President Corica stated that if there is a minimal amount of money involved, he agrees with Councilmember Camicia; discussed facilities; and suggested accepting the report and recommendation, and sending a message to the Commission regarding views expressed by the speakers; noting that, if the Commissions wishes to have additional hearings, it may. Councilmember Camicia moved that be done, and added that the communication to the Commission should include Councilmember Thomas's comments regarding the gymnasium. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion. Councilmember Thomas added that it should also include the comments regarding the Willie Stargell Class A Field. Council, by consensus, agreed and the motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -175 Consideration of approval of the Alameda County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut, commented that it appears the Solid Waste Management Authority, or its agency, may be taking over, in Alameda County, the enforcement of the laws; there needs to be a check and balance of systems as there is now; and suggested the County Health Department carry out duties of enforcement. President Corica stated he agreed with Mr. Scullin on his first point, that there is a lot of wheel- spinning because of the turnover of Authority representatives. Councilmember Monsef stated Council must, by State law, produce a plan by June, and must otherwise accept the State plan, believes the document is good, there are some loose ends regarding implementation but those will be addressed through the organization created by the plan, and moved the City of Alameda accept the plan as presented. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion. President Corica stated Mr. Scullin has a good idea; agrees someone from the Health Department should be involved; and he suggested accepting the County Plan and submitting a note stating Council would like someone from the Public Health Department to be on -site to inspect. Betty Crowley, Alameda County, stated there is a technical committee proposed for the implementation which includes the present Environmental Health Department, the present Fire Chiefs' Association and the District Attorney; they will be the prime movers of the implementation program, under the Authority; regarding inspections, all of the solid waste inspection is under the local enforcement agent, which is the Environmental Health Department, and much of the legislation is under the State Department of Health, and there are local and County entities listed, that are responsible, are regulated by the State. March 14, 1989 Councilmember Thomas inquired what cities have adopted it, to which Ms. Crowley stated it has been referred to the cities for comments, and explained the procedure that will be followed. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -176 Resolution No. 11673 "Approving Alameda County's Hazardous Waste Management Plan." Adopted. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion which was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 -177 "From City Manager on methods for financing purchase of the Library Site." Accepted. James Selby, 2146 Lincoln Avenue, stated the Park Street Business Association Board of Directors basically requests assurances from the City that some form of funds will be found to continue the revitalization of business districts, and submitted a letter regarding the subject. Diane Coler -Dark, 2857 Jackson Street, stated that funding the library with UDAG funds is a short -term answer, but it is not the long -term answer to revitalization of Alameda. The City Manager explained the process by which the City intends to reimburse the UDAG funds. Del Blaylock, 1903 Encinal, requested Council refrain from using the UDAG money, which he believes should not be taken from Webster Street, and believes there are other ways to fund the library. Richard Roth, 1417 5th Street, stated he is concerned with the risk the City is taking running the motel operation; believes West Alameda qualified Alameda for the UDAG funds; staff states there are no funds for Webster Street parking; Webster Street and other areas need help the funds could provide; recommends if the library could not be located at Portola Triangle because it is an unsafe area, then the problem should be corrected; Council should weigh how to spend the $1,800,000.00 and he does not believe it should be used for a motel. Bruce Conrad, 1717 Nason Street, President, Western Alameda Business Association, stated he is concerned about revitalization of older business districts; believes businesses have been lost because the business areas look so poorly; Council should consider how this money will be spent and be sure there will be money continually for revitalization of the business districts. Cheryl Heihn, President, Board of Directors, Alameda Main Street March 14, 1989 84 Project, urged Council to, when devising a method to finance the library, include a provision for replenishing the UDAG fund so that historic commercial districts can continue and complete their revitalization programs. Louis Allen, 641B Haight Street, commended Council on efforts to do the best possible for the City; he does not want UDAG money unavailable for Webster Street's parking needs; prostitution, robberies, etc., have increased on Webster Street, it is spreading, and is a problem for Alameda; and he requested funds for parking. The City Manager stated in six to nine months, the City should be able to begin looking at acquiring property and building a parking lot; explained the funding mechanism proposed which should result in replenishment of the UDAG funds. President Corica stated the concern appears to be regarding replenishment of the UDAG funds; believes Council should go ahead; and hopes those present will trust that the City Manager will be able to provide a way that will replenish the UDAG funds. Councilmember Thomas stated a new library is needed; discussed UDAG interest repayment, believes there will be benefit to Park Street due to improvement of the area when the new library is constructed; and hopes the community will get behind the decision. Councilmember Camicia stated he has unanswered questions; after ten years of discussing a library, he would expect to see a comprehensive document that would explain not only financing of the purchase of the site, but financing the construction of the building, the demolition, and when the demolition will take place; he would like a report from the Risk Manager explaining what the possible liabilities are in terms of the City being responsible for the operation of the motel; he is not comfortable with two pages, and verbal responses; with the information, he believes people would join Council, supporting the proposed library site. President Corica stated the first move would be to fund the purchase of the library; the site search has gone on for a long period, and time is of the essence to purchase the property. Councilmember Camicia stated he made a commitment to follow through, but he believes people will join with Council, if their questions are answered, and concerns are covered. Councilman Arnerich stated he agrees with Councilmember Camicia, and is concerned about the Webster Street merchants and the monies should be replenished at the rate of return anticipated; the Golf Course and Bay Fairway Hall are a source of return to the City, the Linoaks property will not decrease in value, and believes the City money will be stable there; believes implementation of the purchase is the first step but agrees more information is needed. President Corica stated the City Manager has indicated information will be provided at the next Council Meeting. March 14, 1989 Councilmember Monsef stated the recommendation is to ask the staff to put the matter on the next meeting agenda with further information; he would like to see the concern of the business districts addressed; and moved approval of the recommendation. Council, by consensus, unanimously approved. 89 -178 Resolution No. Amending the Combined Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of Alameda by amending the Land Use Plan Map Designation from Special Single Family to Neighborhood Commercial for the property located at 475 Santa Clara Avenue. (Continued from February 21, 1989, Council Meeting.) This matter will not be heard for 120 days for reasons stated by President Corica. (See 89 -170) 89 -179 From Fire Chief regarding Dr. Crowell's review of the progress of the Emergency Medical System. President Corica stated Dr. Crowell basically states that the City and Fire Fighters are doing a good job with the program. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to accept the report. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 89 -180 From the Director of the Recreation and Park Department regarding the Five Year Plan for the Administration of Paratransit Programs in Alameda County. [Mr. Decelle, who requested removal of the item was no longer present.] Councilmember Thomas made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 89 -181 Resolution No. "Formation of Community Facilities District, authorizing the levy of a Special Tax within the District, preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District and submitting levy of the Special Tax and the establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the District." Held over. [This matter is being held over to the next Council Meeting. See 89 -173) 89 -182 Resolution No. "Determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness within Community Facilities District and submitting proposition to the qualified electors of the District. (Community Facilities District No. 1, Harbor Bay)" [This matter is being held over to the next Council Meeting. See March 14, 1989 8 89 -173) 89 -183 Resolution No. "A Resolution calling Special Election. (Community Facilities District No. 1, Harbor Bay)" This matter is being held over to the next Council Meeting. See 89 -173) 89 -184 Resolution No. 11674 "Authorizing the Bureau of Electricity to, execute the California Public Utility Insurance Authority Joint Powers Agreement." Adopted. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Camicia seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 89 -185 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Reclassifying and rezoning of a certain property within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, New Series; Applicant: Mira Lee for William Mah; R -88 -8 the property located at 475 Santa Clara Avenue." (Continued from February 21, 1989, Council Meeting.) This matter will not be heard for 120 days for reasons stated by President Corica. (See 89 -170) FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 89 -186 Ordinance No. , N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending various sections of Chapter 1, Title XI, thereof, relating to regulations for yards for substandard lots and for permitted encroachments in required yards." Tabled to next meeting. Richard Roth, 1417 - 5th Street, commented on the width of driveways; addressed the matter of chain link fences; and stated Council should reject the ordinance and send it back to the Planning Board to be rewritten. Councilmember Thomas stated she voted against it previously and will again, unless someone wants to agree to Mr. Roth's comments; a three or four car garage would only be allowed a 10 -foot wide driveway; would like to see the chain -link fence deleted. Council discussed tabling the matter, and problems with chain -link fencing. Councilmember Camicia made a motion to table the matter to the next meeting, and direct staff report back with a recommendation on alternatives for fencing that would provide visibility. Councilmember Thomas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. March. 14, 1989 NEW BUSINESS 89 -187 Councilmember Camicia requested consideration of street improvements, e.g., repair of potholes at Oakland and Alameda entrances to the Park Street Bridge. 89 -188 Councilmember Camicia commended the Fire Department, Alameda Hospital, Supervisor Perata and Mayor Corica for the good Emergency Medical Service program. President Corica commented it was a team effort. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, DIANE B. FELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. March 14, 1989 01 - REG VOTERS - IN PRECINCTS COUNTED 02 - MUMS CAST - MEAL ALAMEDA SOIOOL DISTRICT 03 - DONALD R. MACDONELL 04 - WILLINI C. "BILL" GARVTNE 05 - BARBARA RASMUS,SEN AAMEOA CITY COUNCIL 06 - BILL WITIQK7W 07 - WALT 5111111 CIY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL EIICIICN March 7, 1989 OFFICIAL CANVASS MAMMA CITY COUNCIL (cont'd) 08 - NADI MUt4SEF 09 - A.J. "LIL" ARNERICH 10 - CLAYTON 6IJYTON 11 - GEORGE GADSBY 12 - DIANE COL.ER- i?A101 ALAMEDA AUDITOR 13 - KEVIN W. HARPER 14 - ROBERT 11. LDFSIR711•D 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 0R 09 10 11 12 13 14 PCT 30000 690 276 166 136 172 129 13 67 162 11 64 52 115 107 PCT 30010 836 294 174 161 182 206 16 43 130 7 51 63 139 98 PCT 30011 699 314 215 169 213 155 14 98 163 17 55 80 138 111 PCT 30012 582 268 190 171 179 118 8 91 171 8 63 53 111 98 PCT 30014 705 266 179 151 168 144 20 60 -127 13 51 74 114 94 PCT 30015 714 299 204 165 182 178 14 77 -107 7 58 87 137 91 PCT 30016 932 327 203 169 197 213 15 70 •147 15 51 79 178 93 PCT 30020 920 401 268 226 260 228 22 51 •200 10 139 80 190 134 PCI 30030 712 299 196 162 192 -115 20 88 196 11 25 94 150 102 PCT 30040 671 309 214 186 201 120 13 108 213 9 32 85 123 123 PCP 30070 629 297 206 172 195 135 17 82 198 6 46 70 154 95 PCT 30080 692 330 741 185 223 149 17 133 183 10 51 74 155 115 PCT 30110 673 297 190 172 194 155 31 65 150 11 44 92 136 107 PCI 30120 712 273 166 143 178 127 17 56 156 11 45 90 120 93 PCT 30140 693 289 190 161 178 117 9 89 177 10 37 99 116 117 PCT 30151 675 208 142 130 143 98 19 65 119 9 30 48 100 63 PCT 30152 681 181 122 95 118 90 11 42 92 7 45 40 68 73 FLT 30170 766 203 133 119 136 66 19 66 107 18 31 58 91 70 PCT 30180 717 220 149 112 147 65 17 65 124 9 37 90 96 79 PCT 30190 646 194 124 117 131 73 19 59 104 11 30 70 88 74 PCT 30200 729 244 14B 141 163 105 25 85 115 13 34 70 112 73 PCT 30210 633 133 67 60 81 41 9 38 68 11 14 44 65 39 PCT 30220 668 298 203 167 179 122 19 74 182 15 60 72 111 112 PCT 30230 483 104 65 53 58 29 7 35 57 11 20 23 38 36 PCT 30240 582 122 75 58 68 44 15 36 57 11 10 47 60 28 DD5 /1 01 - REG VOTERS - IN PRECINCTS COUNTED 02 - BAUJQLS CAST - TOTAL ALAMEDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 03 - DONALD R. MACDONELL 04 - WILLIAM C. 'BILL" GAPVINE 05 - BARBARA RA.SMUSSEN ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL 06 - BILL WITHICW 07 - WALT SMITH CITY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL ELECTICU March 7, 1989 OFFICIAL CANVASS AIJ8IIDA CITY COUNCIL (coned) 08 - HADI M14SEF 09 - A.J. "LIL" ARNER1aI 10 - CLAYTON GUYrON 11 - GEORGE GADSBY 12 - DIANE OILER-DARK ALAMEDA AUDITOR 13 - KEVIN W. HARPER 14 - ROBERT H. IL 'STAND 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 PCT 30250 616 128 82 65 75 42 13 27 63 12 22 41 51 43 PCT 30251 666 149 101 85 99 58 21 22 78 12 26 51 72 46 PCT 30270 645 146 84 75 89 65 17 38 70 10 17 36 69 45 PCP 30300 746 158 94 86 95 75 12 44 69 4 30 48 67 47 PCT 30320 707 160 113 85 92 70 15 37 89 7 35 36 71 53 PCT 30330 435 163 122 91 99 62 3 67 101 4 18 48 59 64 PCT 30331 485 200 138 133 146 120 17 36 ' 95 3 45 59 88 73 PCT 30340 700 271 165 151 180 157 22 48 .110 17 66 65 121 90 PCT 30350 700 209 144 120 142 84 16 63 110 5 32 63 98 66 PCT 30360 435 117 77 76 86 53 10 36 • 48 5 31 32 54 45 PCT 30370 567 139 74 65 86 42 16 48 66 5 18 43 59 46 PCT 30380 635 134 73 73 85 66 13 33 49 13 33 39 54 48 PCT 30400 736 245 171 146 175 101 15 62 117 16 49 B2 87 108 PCT 30410 564 76 46 44 53 44 3 20 • 28 4 12 23 41 23 PCT 30412 804 200 148 111 132 74 9 71 116 10 29 51 82 83 PCT 30420 663 286 199 175 188 143 22 83 145 13 41 68 105 102 PCT 30450 802 176 105 87 113 72 19 39 85 11 32 54 70 74 PCT 30460 833 199 122 94 130 93 17 61 89 13 40 41 79 77 PCT 30470 662 144 93 75 95 50 22 34 69 13 22 36 56 60 PCT 30480 720 159 93 78 105 57 33 52 68 15 22 41 83 42 PCT 30490 599 135 94 68 89 49 7 37 74 15 21 41 60 58 PCT 30500 877 201 128 105 128 77 25 37 100 28 42 50 86 78 PCT 30510 833 102 59 43 66 48 9 16 . 41 25 11 21 65 21 DO5/2 March 14, 1989 01 - ROG VOTERS - TN PRFICINCI:s CCUI ml) 02 - RATIPIS CAST - TWAT, AIN1EIJA SCHOOL DISTRICT 03 - IX17A J R. MACTXVEIS. 04 - WIJJAN1 C. "BILL" GARVTNT 05 - BARBARA RAS0'SSF 1 ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL 06 - 8111 WITIOxW 07 - WALT SFV'Ili CITY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL ELE7CTICU Marcie 7, 1989 OFFICIAL CANVASS ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL (cont'd) 08 - HTDI Mt1SFF 09 - A.J. "LIL" AI8IERICH 10 - CLAYTON GUYMON 11 - GEORGE GADSBY 12 - DIANE COLE R-0ARR ALAMEDA AUDITOR 13 - KEVIN W. HARPER 14 - ROBERT H. LDFSRAND 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 PCT 30540 758 227 157 106 134 92 15 62 136 16 26 61 92 88 PCT 30541 658 119 74 69 78 56 15 39 40 7 23 33 50 39 PCT 30550 699 108 53 35 67 32 7 18 26 63 7 17 51 30 PCT 30560 613 169 110 84 110 46 8 59 118 7 21 45 79 63 PCT 30570 714 135 71 64 94 60 10 29 67 12 23 42 64 37 AV - 02 1153 774 660 695 489 85 338 616 47 143 295 473 430 IU5 /3 MAMMA 7TWASIMER 01 - LEWIS E. HURWITZ 02 - W. AI0T1833 "N," HAR17VAN, JR A - AIN'®A SC HCOL DISTRICT BOND $47 MIL 03 - YES 04 - NO B - ALAMEDA SCIIOOL DISTRICT BOND $2.5 MIL 05 - YES 06 -NO CITY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL EJECTION Mardi 7, 1989 O F F I C I A L C A N V A S S C - CITY OF ALAMEDA CHARTER COMPENSATION 07 -YES 08 - NO D - CITY OF ALAMEDA CHARTER ELECTION 09 -YES 10 - NO E - CITY OF AIAM DA CHARTER AUDITOR i TREASURER 11 - YES 12 - NO 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 PCT 30000 136 92 156 113 140 126 84 162 190 62 105 139 PCP 30010 13B 105 228 59 196 86 106 159 144 119 93 151 PCT 30011 144 109 213 86 175 114 105 175 182 100 128 149 PCT 30012 136 76 184 81 138 124 95 153 163 88 119 125 PCT 30014 125 81 177 82 141 113 73 159 138 105 86 151 PCT 30015 132 84 227 63 191 90 91 161 144 108 103 145 PCT 30016 149 110 262 60 227 91 95 193 157 135 105 181 PCT 30020 208 128 269 125 237 149 108 252 222 147 156 203 PCI 30030 160 99 170 120 168 120 83 186 169 98 107 160 PCT 30040 149 109 206 92 197 98 90 183 182 101 143 128 PCT 30070 130 118 188 106 184 104 83 191 186 90 121 153 PCP 30080 171 101 204 121 210 112 102 208 184 124 123 168 PCT 30110 140 111 207 85 189 103 68 197 139 135 79 182 PCP 30120 119 107 161 107 156 112 77 176 139 116 99 154 PCP 30140 162 75 177 106 169 113 88 174 164 105 132 137 PCT 30151 92 78 108 90 114 88 55 138 123 72 96 95 PCT 30152 89 58 116 50 98 62 59 100 88 68 68 83 PCP 30170 99 67 126 65 113 74 62 120 108 74 71 103 PCP 30180 110 77 144 71 132 79 67 127 122 75 73 118 PCT 30190 104 60 140 47 128 61 68 112 119 57 71 104 PCT 30200 102 84 147 89 143 92 60 158 126 93 92 126 PCT 30210 50 53 83 45 80 46 38 75 67 50 47 68 p 30240 PCT 30220 141 88 188 108 176 112 86 183 156 112 107 147 PCP 44 40 48 1 81 80 34 40 63 66 41 53 52 DP5/4 March 14, 1989 CITY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL ELECTION March 7, 1989 O F F I C I A L C A N V A S S ALAMEDA TREASURE 01 - LEWIS E. HURWITZ 02 - W. AIFRED "AL" HA TmAN, JR A - ALAFWDA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND $47 MIL 03 - YES 04 - NO C - CITY OF ALAMEDA C[WII'ER COMPENSATION 07 - YES 08 - NO 0 - CITY OF ALN1FW CHARTER 011XTICN 09 - YES 10 -NO P - ALNffDA SC1i001, DISTRICT POND $2.5 MIL E - CITY OF RUMBA CHARTER AUDITOR b TREASURER 05 - YES 11 - YES 06 -NO 12 -NO 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 PCT 30250 54 39 87 36 82 39 42 75 64 52 45 68 PCT 30251 66 54 106 39 107 37 39 96 79 56 50 86 PCT 30270 51 68 97 42 92 47 38 89 77 54 61 65 PCT 30300 65 62 104 51 102 53 46 101 80 66 50 91 PCT 30320 72 53 100 56 88 66 48 100 81 63 63 77 FCT 30330 71 51 106 54 92 66 40 106 89 62 74 70 PCT 30331 105 60 111 84 97 96 51 129 96 84 78 103 PCT 30340 116 102 178 82 166 97 77 162 139 106 104 125 PCT 30350 90 79 148 55 130 70 59 129 112 77 84 96 PCT 30360 64 37 84 28 80 32 39 66 62 47 48 55 FCT 30370 66 45 85 50 75 61 39 82 79 46 47 73 PCT 30380 55 52 94 38 81 47 35 79 76 43 57 56 PCT 30400 124 72 16B 70 136 100 70 150 118 106 88 130 PCT 3041D 36 22 52 19 51 19 21 41 36 29 22 39 PCT 30412 104 70 127 65 104 86 57 124 94 90 71 105 PCT 30420 123 96 201 82 189 90 BO 168 144 114 111 134 PCT 30450 88 57 123 47 108 59 41 114 94 64 62 86 PCT 30460 94 61 126 70 97 94 43 138 93 81 62 104 PCT 30470 77 47 92 46 80 57 34 89 77 53 54 70 PCT 30480 62 62 113 44 90 58 51 92 79 64 54 86 PCT 30490 71 52 91 39 80 48 28 84 72 51 34 82 OCT 30500 93 69 145 48 121 67 59 121 92 87 63 114 PCT 30510 42 44 89 9 72 25 30 63 64 33 34 54 DD5 /5 ALAMEDA TREASURER 01 - LEWIS E. HUIWWITZ 02 - W. ALFRED "AL" IRUTHANN, JR A - ALAMEDA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND $47 MIL 03 - YES 04 -NO B - ALAMEDA SO/ COL DISTRICT BOND $2.5 MIT, 05 - YES 06 -NO CITY OF ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL ELECTION March 7, 1989 OFFICIAL CANVASS C - CITY OF ALAMEDA CHARTER CCHPEWATIQ4 07 - YES 08 - NO D - CITY OF ALAMEDA CHARTER ELECTION 09 - YES 10 -NO E - CITY OF ALAMEDA CHARTER AUDITOR 6 TREASURER 11 -YES 12 - NO 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 PCT 30540 114 65 138 81 110 103 49 157 102 103 61 119 PCT 30541 54 40 85 32 79 39 41 63 54 54 52 51 PCT 30550 47 36 87 13 66 29 31 52 56 29 27 52 PCT 30560 82 61 116 50 102 60 58 92 97 60 68 84 PCT 30570 47 56 98 36 95 34 37 78 64 54 39 71 AV - 02 594 317 656 400 595 456 304 650 592 426 396 564 March 14, 1989 112516 CIY OF ALAM DA MJNICIPM EIFLTICN Mardi 7, 1989 OFFICIAL CANVASS F - CITY OF A AP DA OIAOT7:R HISTORICAL RCVJ87 01 - YES 02 - NO G - CITY OF AINSEDA 1% TN: 03 - YES 04 - NO 01 02 03 04 PCT 30250 63 48 78 38 PCT 30251 83 51 99 40 30270 76 49 77 58 PCT 30300 88 54 89 63 PCT 30320 69 63 102 50 PCT 30330 82 61 106 49 PCT 30331 107 72 116 77 30340 162 73 154 95 PCT 30350 122 59 125 69 PCT 30360 62 43 77 32 PCT 30370 72 44 71 61 PCT 30380 78 33 63 60 PCT 30400 138 80 154 79 PCT 30410 38 22 44 23 IC1 30412 96 79 108 77 PCT 30420 156 91 159 109 PCT 30450 92 62 106 62 PCT 30460 98 65 107 72 PCT 30470 76 44 80 49 PCT 30480 81 60 87 61 PCT 30490 68 44 74 46 PCT 30500 105 63 128 55 PCT 30510 56 32 78 18 CAS /8 F - CITY OF ALAN®A MAR= HISTORICAL BOARD 01 -YES 02 - NO G - CITY OF AIAMEDA 1% TAX 03 - YES 04 - NO 01 02 03 04 PCT 30000 133 98 170 93 PCT 30010 155 91 174 103 PCT 30011 170 91 222 73 PCT 30012 147 95 206 53 PCT 30014 139 86 161 83 PCT 30015 156 93 181 95 PCT 30016 178 102 214 95, PCT 30020 216 133 269 115 PCT' 30030 139 111 186 96 PCT 30040 175 93 197 93 PCT 30070 171 98 188 100 PCT 30080 173 115 196 122 PCT 30110 161 101 174 111 PCT 30120 151 104 148 122 PCT 30140 161 100 193 81 PCT 30151 112 73 131 66 PCT 30152 94 56 115 46 PCT 30170 97 76 119 69 PCT 30180 119 74 122 88 PCT 30190 114 53 123 60 PCT 30200 112 95 142 92 PCT 30210 72 36 80 41 PCT 30220 141 106 163 112 PCP 30230 53 39 55 42 PCT 30240 78 28 86 28 DD5 /7 F - CITY OF AIAMFDA CHARIER HISTORICAL BOARD 01 - YES 02 -NO G - CITY OF ALAMEDA 1% TAX 03 - YES 04 - NO 01 02 03 04 PCT 30540 108 92 126 90 PCT 30541 65 35 77 33 PCT 30550 46 35 60 29 PCP 30560 97 54 107 55 PCT 30570 70 41 81 40 AV - 02 599 340 689 359 005/9 March 14, 1989