Loading...
1987-02-17 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA FEBRUARY 17, 1987 The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. (at the conclusion of the Community Improvement Commission meeting) with President Diament presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Monsef. Reverend Martell Twitchell gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, Lucas, Monsef, and President Diament - 5. Absent: None. MINUTES Councilmember Hanna made a motion for approval of the minutes of the Regular Council Meetings of January 20, 1987, and February 3, 1987. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: January 20, 1987, Minutes: Ayes: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna, and Monsef - 3. Noes: None. Absent: None Abstentions: Councilmember Lucas and President Diament - 2. February 3, 1987, Minutes: Ayes: Councilmembers Corica, Hanna Lucas, and President Diament - 4. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstention: Councilmember Monsef - 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hanna moved for adoption of the Consent Calendar; Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS *87-087 From Chairman of the Historical Advisory Commission regarding the use of Grant Funds for the Alameda Main Library Building. Accepted. *87-088 From Finance Director on City's Investment Portfolio as of January 31, 1987. Accepted. *87-089 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Branaugh Excavating Inc. for repair and resurfacing of certain streets, Phase 6, P.W. No. 2-87-3. Accepted. *87-090 From Public Works Director recommending acceptance of work by Pfister Excavating, Inc. for major storm drain system, Harbor Bay Parkway, Tract 5348, Harbor Bay Business Park, Assessment District 84-4, P.W. No. 5-86-14. Accepted. *87-091 From Recreation and Parks Director regarding the planting of Portola Triangle. Accepted. 33 RESOLUTIONS *87-092 Resolution No. 11106 "Adopting Plans and Specifications for landscape improvements for Atlantic Avenue, Alameda Marina Village Assessment District 84-3, calling for bids and directing City Clerk to advertise same." Adopted. *87-093 Resolution No. 11107 "Adopting Plans and Specifications for repair and resurfacing of certain streets, Phase 8, calling for bids and directing City Clerk to advertise same." Adopted. *87-094 Resolution No. 11108 "Authorizing reduction of retention on Harbor Bay Parkway, Phase III, P.W. No. 1-85-2." Adopted. *87-095 Resolution No. 11109 "Authorizing award of contract to O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. for reconstruction of Eagle Avenue from Eighth Street to Thau Way and authorizing execution thereof." Adopted. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES *87-096 Ordinance No. 2319 "Reclassifying and rezoning certain properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., Applicant: City of Alameda, R-86-8, those properties in the Fernside Shopping Center located at 2601-2691 Blanding Avenue." Adopted. BILLS *87-097 A List of Claims, certified by the City Manager as correct, was approved in the amount of $3,416,616.90. RETURN TO THE REGULAR AGENDA WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 87-098 From Executive Board, Alameda Fire Fighters' Association, 2401 Encinal Avenue, regarding Fire Department level of service. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to accept the communication. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote 5. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to carry discussion on the matter over until the report and recommendation from the Fire Chief regarding Fire Services comes before Council. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (See item No. 87-109.) HEARINGS 87-099 Hearing regarding proposed Negative Declaration and Zoning Text Amendment, ZA-86-3, which would delete the definition for "apartment hotel," delete the R-3 through R-6 zoning classification; add new land use regulations pertaining to residential, office and business uses; add a section pertaining to non-conforming uses; add a section pertaining to a Housing Authority site; and add a section stating the time that the ordinance will apply to specific properties; Applicant: City of Alameda. (Continued from October 21, 1986) The Planning Director reviewed the background of the subject matter. Councilmember Lucas commented it had been her concern from the beginning that businesses not be discouraged, and suggested that the third alternative, outlined in Planning Director's memo of February 6, 1987, regarding density, might solve the problems. Councilmember Corica stated he believes what should be done is downzone density factor in residential areas to no more than a duplex. The City Attorney commented that, in terms of conformance to the General Plan, it would still be necessary to go through the mapping process. President Diament opened the public portion of the hearing. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, the following spoke: Christopher Hanson, 543 Palace Court. Linda I. Pritchard, 3263 San Jose, representing Alameda Board of Realtors. John E. Mitcheom, P.O. Box 400. Madlyn K. Murphy, 2618 Janis Circle. Edward J. Murphy, 2618 Janis Circle. Diane Coler-Dark, 2857 Jackson Street. R. G. Sandifer, 8 Wellfleet Bay. Fred J. Scullin, 1120 Chestnut. Ian S. Keye, 1915 Schiller Street. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Corica made a motion to limit the residental number of units in multiple zones to R-2, and leave everything else as it currently exists in the City's zoning ordinances. Councilmember Hanna clarified that Council would not be rezoning but would be setting'the density, to which Councilmember Corica replied that was correct. Councilmember Monsef questioned whether it would go to Planning Board to which Councilmember Corica replied he would modify the motion to include referral to the Planning Board. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion. Councilmember Corica commented that perhaps the Planning Director could speed the process. The City Manager requested clarification that the intent was to 35 retain the R-3 through R-6 for purposes of all the other uses allowed in those zoning designations, to which Councilmember Corica replied that was the intent. The Planning Director clarified that the motion's intent also was that there would be not more than 2 units per building, and a very large lot could have several duplexes, to which Councilmember Corica agreed that was correct. The Planning Director also inquired if the 2500 square foot per unit designation, which would be consistent with the General Plan, was to be adopted also. Councilmember Corica said he would add the 2500 square foot designation to the motion. Councilmember Lucas said she believed that would be desirable, and noted that, for the 2500 square foot designation, it would be necessary to amend the current R-2 zoning, and recommended the Planning Board address that ratter also. The City Attorney stated he interprets the motion to mean: Strike from the ordinance references to apartments, multiple dwelling units, conform-change all the densities to 2500 square feet and, that the Housing Authority exception will remain and the Measure A grandfathering provision in this ordinance will also remain. Following a detailed discussion on the amended ordinance to be submitted to the Planning Board, the vote was taken and the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-100 Hearing regarding Tentative Map 5716, which would subdivide a portion of the Alameda Marina Village Property into 18 lots, for condominium development. Applicant: Alameda Marina Village Associates. Donald M. Parker, 1150 Marina Village Parkway, Alameda Marina Village Associates, reported on the progress of project and provided a slide presentation. The Planning Director commented that the proposal complies with the Master Plan and the City's General Plan. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, there were none. John Barni, Jr., 875 Island Drive, made general comments regarding tax increment bond financing, lagoon wooden retaining walls and tandem parking. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Hanna explained the purpose of tentative maps, and made a motion to take the related resolutions out of order. o6 Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion. Councilmember Corica stated that there has been a rush for building permits which he believes is being done in order to beat the proposed traffic initiative ordinance, and he would vote no because he does not want to vote for residences of any size until the traffic initiative has been decided by the voters. Councilmember Monsef stated the developer has done a good job and is entitled to finish it. Councilmember Corica commented that he has no qualms about the type of construction of the Marina Village project, that the developer has done an excellent job. The motion to take the resolutions out of order was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hanna, Lucas, Monsef, and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica - 1. Absent: None. 87-101 Resolution No. 11110 "Approving Tentative Map 5716, an 18-lot condominium subdivision located north of Independence Drive between Marina Village Parkway and Triumph Drive, finding said Tentative Map consistent with the City's General Plan and determining that discharge of water into the sewer system will not violate regional water quality control regulations." Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Hanna seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lucas, Hanna, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica 1. Absent: None. 87-102 Resolution No. 11111 "Approving street names for three cul-de-sac streets in the residential development of Marina Village." Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lucas, Hanna, Monsef and President Diament - 4. Noes: Councilmember Corica 1. Absent: None. 87-103 Hearing regarding General Plan Amendment, GPA-86-1, Rezoning, R-86-9, and Negative Declaration, IS-86-19, for the proposed Trash Transfer Station at 500 Maitland Drive. Applicant: City of Alameda. The Planning Director explained the matter. The public portion of the hearing was opened. On the call for proponents, there were none. On the call for opponents, there were none. The public portion of the hearing was closed. Councilmember Monsef stated the proposal was much better than what is presently on site and he would support it, and moved to accept the Planning Board recommendation and take the related resolution and ordinance out of order. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87 -104 Resolution No. 11112 "Amending the Combined Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of Alameda to change the land use designation of 500 Maitland Drive (Assessor's Parcel No. 74- 1040 -3 -15) from Open Space to Light Industrial." Councilmember Monsef made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87 -105 Ordinance No. N.S. "Reclassifying and rezoning certain properties within the City of Alameda by amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., New Series; Applicant: City of Alameda, R -86 -9, the property located at 500 Maitland Drive (Assessor's Parcel No. 74- 1040- 3 -15). " Councilmember Monsef made a motion to introduce the ordinance. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87 -106 From President, Library Board, regarding space needs for the new main library. Gertrude Woods, 1247 Sherman Street, Alameda Free Library Board of Trustees, commented on the enormous amount of space necessary to house the growing amount of information in science and other areas, and the necessity of facing the needs for the 21st century; noted qualifications of the consultant, chosen by the Board; and stated the recommended minimum area for a new library should be 31,612 square feet. Ms. Woods urged Council to accept the Space Needs Study. Rob Richard, Santa Ana Public Library, Library Consultant (Space Needs Assessment),informed Council that he was available to answer questions. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to approve the document. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87 -107 From Library Building Committee regarding site selection recommendation for new main library. Dr. Al Edgerton, Library Building Committee Chair, Santa Clara Avenue, stated Council asked for site within three block radius of City Hall; that the Alameda Theatre site was decided upon after consideration of fifteen sites; and that certain artifacts from the building should be preserved. John Nelson, Library Building Committee Consultant, noted an analysis on site options was done; that the building was not suitable in size, or seismically, for a new library; that to retain the marque and front of theatre would require seismic evaluation; and that there were serious structural deficiencies. Councilmember Corica stated that when the Church of the Nazarene had been considered for a site, it was necessary to keep part of the property for parking, but now that the property at the corner of Oak and Central had been condemned for parking, the church site could be reevaluated, including the area formerly designated for parking, and he would like to see some comparative costs. John Fenstermarcher, County of Alameda, Real Estate Division, stated it is difficult to condemn churches because of congregations who want replacement in kind. Councilmember Lucas noted that the committee does not want to incorporate the old library building or the new historical building [the Alameda Theatre], and inquired if the consultant believed there was a bias against the use of historical buildings. John Nelson responded that there was not necessarily a bias against historical buildings but there was concern regarding the functional aspect. Phyllis Lufkin, 1061 Camino del Valle, President, Friends of the Alameda Free Library, urged Council to accept the recommended site of the Library Committee. William Alex Hawksbee, 3237 Washington Street, member of the Friends of the Alameda Free Library, commented that the current library is inadequate; but that the Carnegie Library might become as it is in many places, a wonderful museum. Woody Minor, Chairman of the Historical Advisory Committee, commented he is a friend of the library and a friend of the theatre; asked for harmony and working together of those who are the stewards of the cultural resources of the City, and those who are trying to renew the area, including the Park Street Revitalization Committee; stated that other libraries in the country build annexes that are state-of-the-art, . and retain their cultural heritage; and asked Council to delay their decision and get an in-depth structural report. Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, stated he would second Woody Minor's presentation; stated that if the library is located at the theatre site, peop1 would be taking parking spaces needed by the Park Street shoppers; and suggested Leydecker Park as space for library, or Harbor Bay Isle site from the 12 acres owed by Harbor Bay Isle Associates. Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, stated she is a friend of the library and the theatre also, but if the City does not have the 9 millions of dollars necessary to build the sizeable building under consideration, then perhaps Council should not proceed until funds can be found. Christopher Hansen, 543 Palace Court, stated he has problems with limiting the site to a civic center area; the church site sounds appropriate; and the Alameda Theatre is more than just a building as it has the potential of bringing people back to Park Street. Christopher Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Avenue, urged Council to reject the recommendation; noting the Alameda Theatre could become a performing arts center and a focus of Park Street revitalization. Dave Plummer, 1401 High Street, member of Historical Advisory Committee, stated he has concerns about parking; the 2305 Central Avenue property was condemned because of parking needs; and urged Council to postpone until further hearings could be held. Denise Rosko, 2701 Central Avenue, member of Alameda Victorian Preservation Society, expressed concern about the proposed destruction of the Alameda Theatre. Alan Michaan, 1601 Central Avenue, stated he is the owner of the Grand Lake Theatre, which had been considered worthless and now is one of the most successful theatre operations in Northern California; and remarked that the Alameda Theatre can be revitalized as well as the Park Street District. Mr. Michaan urged Council to protect a piece of Alameda Heritage. Councilmember Lucas noted there is currently a lease restriction for seven years and asked if Mr. Michaan would be willing to wait and do something with the theatre at the end of that time, to which he stated he would as he has already been waiting for many years. Naomi Hatkin, 1217 Park Avenue, stated she believes Alameda needs a fine library but believes a-solution can be found in using the existing facility and adding to it and urged Council not to destroy the Alameda Theatre. Dorothy Larzelere, 1274 Weber Street, Library Building Committee, commented that perhaps the solution at the end of the years of effort of trying to find new library space is to turn the matter over to the Historical Advisory Commission, and let them take care of Carnegie Building problems. President Diament requested the consultant comment on the theatre building and Mr. Nelson responded with details on the condition of the building and costs of repair. Councilmember Lucas stated she agreed that structural problems need to be investigated but questions the Morton report which calls for more investigation; that the report is too preliminary to act upon; that more information is needed. Tom Wetherbee, 4 Embarcadero, #3150, San Francisco, Mattison & Shidler, leaseholder of the Alameda Theatre, stated the cost of 4© acquiring the theatre is close to $700,000; that it cannot currently, under the leasehold, be used as a theatre as it would compete with South Shore Cinema; that leaseholder has been looking for someone to make the property viable but without a specific offer, cannot go into evaluation of all possibilities, has had structural engineer look over the property and evaluation depends upon the type of operation considered, and has been waiting for something economically viable before doing structural evaluation. Councilmember Lucas commented that Mr. Wetherbee apparently has some experience in restoration and in his letter to the City Manager, he had stated that he thought the existing building could be used for a library; and requested that he elaborate. Mr. Wetherbee responded that he had thought it could, but since that time, he realized some of the library needs for capacity necessary for book stacks, number of floors, and other considerations, would not make that application feasible. Gerhard W. Degemann, 19 Sandpiper Place, President, Historic Alameda High School Foundation, Inc., stated the Kaufman Auditorium was designed by the same architect as the Alameda Theatre and he supports preserving both the Auditorium and the Theatre. Councilmember Hanna commented it is easy to postpone matters, and to offer grand uses, but the Committee has been supported with good consultants and has studied hard to find a solution; and moved for acceptance of the report and recommendation. President Diament seconded the motion. Councilmember Lucas stated she would vote against the motion; that the Committee had done a conscientious and good job, but Council must balance it with historical values and other values the community has, including the best possible City planning; that it was not the committee's job to consider these values, but Council must. Councilmember Corica stated he supports a new library, but the picture changed when the City acquired the 2305 Central Avenue property; the church site is larger now because an area for on-site parking is no longer necessary; and he would like further consideration of the church site. Councilmember Monsef stated the report indicated the church site was too costly; that the Committee has looked all over town but Council requested a site within the civic center; and believes Council could give 45 days for further reports and make a final decision at that time. A vote was taken on the motion to accept the report and recommendation as follows: Ayes: Councilmember Hanna and President Diament - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Corica, Lucas and Monsef - 3. Absent: None. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to defer action on the matter for 45 days to allow time for additional information including a further 41 report on the structural integrity of the theatre. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion. Councilmember Corica stated the church property should be checked into also, and Councilmembers Lucas and Monsef agreed. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Following discussion, it was agreed that the City Manager could request an offer from the Church of the Nazarene. Councilmember Hanna made a motion to extend the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-108 From Historical Advisory Commission regarding the appropriate use of the Alameda Theater and the Main Library building. Richard Armstrong, 1626 Encinal Avenue, commented on the history of the Alameda Theatre and the fact that many historic buildings have been destroyed and cannot be replaced; and that many communities have restored their theatres which have become a source of pride. Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, noted that the Lucky Stores site on Webster Street might be a good site to consider for the library. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to accept the report. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-109 From the Fire Chief regarding Fire Services. Mike D'orazi, President, Alameda Firefighters Assoc., stated he concurs with deferral of ambulance purchase as temporary solution; stated that Engine 5 was out of service 32% of the time due to lack of manpower, and to suppression forces used for work on the fireboat, engine 4, office staff for budget and computer, vacation relief, ambulance duty, etc.; and that overtime cost is not due to sick leave, which was lower than previous year, but to retirement and lack of replacement; that population and businesses of Alameda have increased while fire department manpower and firefighting capabilities have decreased; excellent services can be supplied with adequate manpower; and, lives are endangered without the manpower. Richard Kennon, 2328 Granadact, Pinole, Local 689, Interntnl. Assoc. of Firefighters, stated he has been in the Fire Department since 1964; under Proposition 13, the Department lost approximately 25% of manpower in 1979 and the injury rate doubled the next year; that in 1984 when the ambulance serice started, the injury rate increased again by 25% more; as manpower is lost, injuries increase; and added there would be quite a savings in compensation rates paid out for injuries if manpower increased. Douglas Clifton, 18183 Rainier Avenue, Hayward, Alameda Firefighters Assoc., stated he has been with the Department for 7 1/2 years; that City has mutual aid agreement with the Naval Air Station; the second ambulance requires 2 more men from from suppression; and when aid is asked from other jurisdictions, it is with the knowledge 42 that the aid cannot be returned. Chris Reilly, 463 Santa Clara Avenue, Secretary, Local 689, commented that the negotiating report states a strong case for 5 engines, 2 trucks and 2 ambulances, and the City needs to do everything possible to keep this level of service. Michael Hoppe, Alameda Firefighters Assoc, stated he has been 10 years with the Department and is a dedicated employee; he believes manpower is a real issue; the Department has increased responsibility with Bay Farm Island, new development, while still retaining old structural areas; and there are three men per fire company while most recommend four men per company. Pat Paich, 2621 Derby Drive, San Ramon, Exec. Board of Firefighters, commented that, Engine 5 being out of service 32% of time is because of accumulation of problems which need to be considered and evaluated; and, by reducing forces and increasing workloads, injuries have increased 40% in the last few years. Vincent Maloney, 672 El Cerro Boulevard, Danville, stated he has been a firefighter for 18 years, and a captain for 5 years; believes every speaker has spoken factually; manpower shortage is critical; and that deferring purchase of ambulance and raising cost of service by $20.00 may help in short run but not the long run. James N. Ritchey, 222 Pulide Road, Danville, stated he has been a firefighter in Alameda for 10 years, noted that one day when engine 5 was out of service, there were medical calls that occupied 4 ambulances, with 14 firefighters involved, leaving only 9 firefighters left for fire response; that lack of manpower jeopardizes safety of firefighters and citizens of Alameda. Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru Street, stated the Fire Department needs more money; and developers should be responsible for some provision for fire fighting. Minor Chipman, 2821 Marina Drive, Firefighter, stated when there are three men on an engine, one drives, one is officer and only one firefighter remains; sometimes there is no additonal engine company for backup; and if manpower is cut down more injuries are caused. President Diament inquired if City goes back for negotiations, to which the City Manager replied the City does not negotiate wages nor hours, the Council has prerogative as to manpower; and added that the Council can 1) accept the Chief's proposal, 2) accept the City Manager's proposal, or 3) defer consideration to budget time. President Diament commented that Council is proud of the ambulance service but it takes away from fire suppression and that is a great concern. Councilmember Monsef questioned whether or not there is communication in the Fire Department between employer and employee; stated that Council should inquire into the situation and see what is the problem; and asked if the City Manager really backed the 43 recommendation or not. President Diament stated she believed the matter should be addressed at budget session. Councilmember Monsef agreed and added that the City Manager should report back on any problems in the Department. Councilmember Corica stated Council is finding out at the meeting what is happening; that perhaps it is going to take more people to provide the ambulance service; and perhaps more manpower is needed. Councilmember Lucas noted that several speakers mentioned the increased injury rate; and stated it should be investigated. The City Manager said there is a possibility of increased injury rate with back injuries from the ambulance transport. Elizebeth Kingsley, Personnel Director, stated an increase is due to multi-purpose cause; that ambulance service has caused increase in back injuries because of carrying the gurney; and also commented on the City Manager's December 1986 report which addresses redistribution of manpower. The City Manager stated it may be appropriate to review the issues during the budget process. Councilmember Corica stated he would like the City Manager to look into the possibility of getting developers' fees to contribute to public safety program, and determine what other cities are doing. Ray Alberti, Assistant Fire Chief, stated that Los Angeles has fee structure; that developers fees are used mostly for land or equipment but not for ongoing cost. Councilmember Lucas stated smoke detectors decrease incidence of serious fires to which Assistant Chief Alberti agreed that it helps. Councilmember Lucas also questioned the Assistant Chief regarding sprinkler systems and stated she would like a report. Assistant Chief Alberti replied that there are sprinkler system requirements on buildings over 5,000 square feet, except for single family residences; that the department is working toward residential occupancy sprinkler ordinance; and that national statistics show that fires have gone down but hazardous materials incidences are up as well as medical calls which have greatly increased. Councilmember Monsef made a motion to delay action until further information is received from the City Manager's office. Councilmember Lucas seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-110 From Public Works Director concerning Bayview Estates' B.C.D.C. Permit status. 44 The Public Works Director described the issue. Councilmember Lucas stated she believed the Public Works Director's recommendation is a good one and made a motion to accept it. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. RESOLUTIONS 87-111 Resolution No. 11113 "Resolution amending the 1986-87 Operating Budget." Fred Scullin, 1120 Chestnut Street, inquired if a public hearing should have been scheduled. The City Attorney explained there is no public hearing for budget amendments. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was unanimous voice vote - 5. requirement resolution. adopted by 87-112 Resolution No. 11114 "Approving Parcel Map No. 5009 for division of property located at 1240 Post Street and approving exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance for lot width and size and the Subdivision Ordinance for undergrounding of utilities. (George and Vivian Hazard, subdividers)" Councilmember Corica made a motion to adopt the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-113 Resolution No. 11115 "Supporting general concept of "Ring Around the Bay," a continuous bicycle and pedestrian path around San Francisco Bay." Councilmember Lucas commented that she believes the idea is very good but in the community some of the homeowners have had problems with vandalism and crime when paths are close to homes. President Diament agreed and stated perhaps a letter could be sent to Senator Bill Lockyer. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the resolution and authorize Mayor *Diament to send a letter with reference to safety factors. Councilmember Corica seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 87-114 Resolution No. 11116 "Establishing Waste/Source Reduction as a priority in the use and management of hazardous materials in Alameda County." Councilmember Lucas made a motion for adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 43 INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 87-115 "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending various sections of Chapter 1 of Title XI thereof relating to regulations for R-3 through R-6 zones, and non-conforming uses." The Council requested the Ordinance be amended and presented to the Planning Board. See paragraph no. 87-099 (Hearing) for discussion. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCES 87-116 Ordinance No. 2320 N.S. "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by amending Chapter 1 of Title VII thereof to provide for taxicab maintenance standards." Councilmember Lucas made a motion to adopt the ordinance. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 87-117 From City Attorney on proposed ordinance requiring residential unit expansions meet current parking standards. Councilmember Lucas made a motion to send the matter to the Planning Board. Councilmember Monsef seconded the motion and it was carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. NEW BUSINESS 87-118 Councilmember Corica stated that he disagreed with President Diament's ballot argument statement in opposition to Measure C, and does not believe it will be necessary to condemn homes and widen streets. President Diament stated that Council had a report on what it would take to widen intersections and meet the standards, and the condemnation of homes was reported to be necessary in certain areas. Councilmember Lucas stated she believed the ordinance, if it passes, is subject to many interpretations. 87-119 Councilmember Lucas requested staff provide a report regarding crime 'statistics in Alameda, and that her particular interest was in the Webster Street area and within one block west and east. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL 87-120 John Barni, Jr., 1277 Bay Street, commented on his concerns regarding property under consideration for acceptance by the City on Harbor Bay Isle, pursuant to the Landfill Agreement; and stated he believed the fire station building considered through assessment district funding was not what was originally discussed; that it was to be with developer funds and not assessment district funds. 46 87-121 Barbara Thomas, 1118 Paru, addressed Council regarding her concerns for Bay Farm Island fire services coverage; and stated that the traffic initiative requires "reasonable effort", like installing a traffic signal, and she will not vote for taking homes or spending millions of dollars if elected as Councilmember. ADJOURNMENT President Diament adjourned the meeting at 12:35 a.m. Respectfully submitted, (Th ) A Azi '2112 DIANE B. FELSCH City Clerk