1995-10-17 Regular CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 17, 1995
The meeting convened at 8:00 p.m., with Mayor Appezzato presiding.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Mayor Mannix. Reverend
Zuikei Taniguchi, Buddhist Temple of Alameda, gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL -
PRESENT: Councilmembers Arnerich, DeWitt, Lucas,
Vice Mayor Mannix and President Appezzato
- 5.
ABSENT: None.
3. PROCLAMATIONS AND SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
None.
President Appezzato announced that the High Street Bridge would be
reopened effective midnight.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
President Appezzato stated that the following items were pulled for
public discussion: 4-E (95-632) [Report from Public Works Director
recommending Acceptance of Work by Buestad Construction, Inc. for
the Interior Renovation of Historic Alameda High School - East
Wing, 2250 Central Avenue, No. P.W. 05-95-11; 4-H (95-633) [Report
from Public Works Director regarding Utility Undergrounding and
Recommending a Date and Time for a Public Hearing to Consider
Establishing Underground Districts (Phase 4); and 4-1 (95-634)
[Resolution Terminating the Regulatory Agreement between the City
of Alameda and the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda Related
to the Development of 12 Units of Seniors Housing at 2201 Santa
Clara Avenue].
Councilmember Lucas moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried
by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk.
(*95-625) Minutes of the Special and Regular Council Meetings
of September 19, 1995; and the Special City Council & Housing
Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting of September 19, 1995.
Approved.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
3O
(*95-626) Report from Finance Director transmitting Investment
Portfolio for Period Ending September 30, 1995. Accepted.
(*95-627) Report from Fire Chief recommending Adoption of
Specifications and Calling for Bids for Alert and Warning Sirens.
Accepted.
(*95-6281 Report from Public Works Director recommending
Acceptance of Work by Ageon Painting Company for the Painting and
Exterior Renovation of Historic Alameda High School - East Wing,
2250 Central Avenue, No. P.W. 03-95-06. Accepted.
See paragraph (95-632).
(*95-629) Report from Public Works Director recommending
Acceptance of Work by McGuire and Hester and Release of Retention
Account for Alameda Ferry Terminal Shoreline Protection and
Windbreak Construction, No. P.W. 12-92-15. Accepted.
(*95-630) Report from Public Works Director recommending
Authorization of Agreement between the City of Alameda and Port of
San Francisco for Landing Rights at Pier 1/2. Accepted.
See paragraph (95-633).
See paragraph (95-634).
(*95-631) Bills, certified by the City Manager to be true and
correct, were ratified in the sum of $3,887,904.96. Ratified.
(95-632) Report from Public Works Director recommending
Acceptance of Work by Buestad Construction, Inc. for the Interior
Renovation of Historic Alameda High School - East Wing, 2250
Central Avenue, No. P.W. 05-95-11. Accepted.
Gerhard Degemann, Alameda, commended Buestad Construction Company
on the Historic Alameda High School renovation project [interior
renovation], including the upgrades.
Don Bergen, Alameda, commended Ageon Painting Company on the
Historic Alameda High School renovation project [painting and
exterior renovation]; and stated that sprinklers and fire doors
were installed for the safety of employees and records.
Vice Mayor Mannix moved acceptance of the recommendation.
Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
311
(95-633) Report from Public Works Director regarding Utility
Undergrounding and Recommending a Date and Time for a Public
Hearing to Consider Establishing Underground Districts (Phase 4).
Accepted.
Councilmember Lucas stated that the Public Utility Board used
certain criteria to select the areas for undergrounding; that
undergrounding greatly benefits a neighborhood and improves
property values; requested information on the number of miles of
undergrounding in west, central and east Alameda; and stated that
preference should not be given to any one area.
Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance of the recommendation [set a
date of hearing for December 19, 1995, for a public hearing to
ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety, or welfare
require conversion within certain Underground Utility Districts
(Phase 4)]. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion.
President Appezzato stated that at the last public hearing
regarding same, there were many concerned citizens; and recommended
that the City be sure to notify everyone of said hearing.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(95-634) Resolution No. 12694 "Terminating the Regulatory
Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Housing Authority of
the City of Alameda Related to the Development of 12 Units of
Seniors Housing at 2201 Santa Clara Avenue." Adopted.
John Scott Graham, Alameda, stated that approximately 30 to 40
children live in his apartment complex; that said children have no
place to play; and that the complex was not designed with
children's welfare in mind.
Councilmember Lucas moved adoption of the Resolution.
Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(95-635) Resolution No. 12695 "Reappointing Gail A. Wetzork as
a Member of the City Recreation Commission." Adopted.
Councilman Arnerich moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor
Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Wetzork.
Mr. Wetzork, President, Friends of the Park Foundation, provided a
brief overview of the Foundation, including benefits provided by
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
,) 2
the Foundation; stated that a fundraising drive was being conducted
for modern park signage and biographical plaques about local
citizens for whom parks are named, which will provide historical
information for future generations; stated that the Foundation was
seeking support from both the business and residential communities
to fund said endeavors; and that the Foundation was hoping to fund
an endowment to provide a stable, future funding source.
(95-636) Resolution No. 12696 "Appointing J. Shirriel as a
Member of the City Recreation Commission." Adopted.
Councilmember DeWitt moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor
Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Shirriel.
(95-637) Report from the City Manager providing additional
information regarding the City's Modified Work Week.
Earl Peacock, Alameda, spoke in support of a 40-hour, five-day work
week; and suggested that a study be conducted to combine the Police
and Fire Departments into a public safety department where each
fireman is also a policeman and visa versa.
Don Bergen, Alameda, spoke in support of the staff recommendation
not to modify the existing four-day work week, except for the Main
Library.
Judith Altschuler, City employee representing ACEA members at City
Hall, stated that ACEA's membership was polled and 2/3rds of
members at City Hall were in support of retaining the four-day work
week primarily due to the reasons conveyed in the staff report;
advised Council of various reasons for retaining the four-day work
week, e.g. benefit of Fridays off, continuing education, attendance
at children's school functions; stated that the volunteer-basis
work week did not work for ACEA members; and that the majority of
ACEA members would not voluntarily go back to the volunteer-basis
work week.
In response to Councilmember Lucas' inquiry regarding the City's
ability to retain staff due to the benefit of a four-day work week,
even though the salaries are not the highest, Ms. Altschuler
stated that benefit was most definitely a major reason for
employees remaining with the City.
Marion Miller, President, ACEA, stated that ACEA's membership was
polled; that said poll indicated that much of the membership
approved of the four-day work week; that half of the membership is
struggling with the 4% reduction in pay; that the majority of
workers do not want a split work week; that their experience from
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
34_3
the previous work schedule when people took a variety of days off
contributed to their reasons, e.g. inability to get a hold of
employees as needed, forced to come to work on their day off so
that they can get things done, such as reports for the City
Council; that if the City goes back to a five-day work week with
all employees back on a normal five-day schedule, half of the
membership would be willing to work a voluntary-reduced work week;
that when the ACEA Memorandum of Understanding was signed, the City
had $5 million in reserve; that the City currently has $6.1
million, and, therefore, seemed that the City should be able to
return to a full, five-day schedule and the need for the $250,000
the City said necessitated a forced four-day work week for all non-
enterprise ACEA employees no longer prevailed; that if previously-
stated was not the case, ACEA proposed that the Recreation and
Parks Department be brought back to a full, five-day work week;
that the Recreation Department's programs are suffering, and that
it is the front-line staff who gets complaints from parents; that
the Park Maintenance workers need to go back to a five-day schedule
so the parks can be safer, cleaner and better maintained; and that
the ACEA wanted to work with Council to find a plan that benefits
the citizens, the City and the employees.
Councilman Arnerich confirmed that the ACEA members desired to
retain the four-day work week in lieu of a modified work week, and
that the membership would not be reluctant to going back to a five-
day work week.
Ms. Miller stated that it was determined from the membership poll
that if the City returned to a full, five-day work week, 50% of the
membership would be willing to do a voluntary reduced work week;
that they would like to have a day off a week, which would also
help the City monetarily; and that they would volunteer to take the
day off rather than being forced by policy.
Shirley Cummins, Alameda, spoke in support of Vice Mayor Mannix's
recommendation to return to a five-day work week; inquired how many
City employees resided in the City and were available for
disasters; opposed Mr. Peacock's suggestion to create a public
safety department; stated that every City employee can be replaced
and with lower salaries; and that nurses in hospitals must be
ready, willing and able to work all shifts, including holidays,
Saturdays and Sundays.
John Scott Graham, Alameda, spoke in support of the four-day work
week; and opposed the Library being closed on Fridays and suggested
that the Library be closed on Mondays instead.
Vice Mayor Mannix stated that he respected and valued the services
rendered to the City by representative groups; that he was .
disappointed with the reports provided by management; that
management's reports sent back a cannot-do message; that he does
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
344
not agree with many reasons given by management; that the City is
a customer-oriented business; that his problems with opening City
Hall on a less than five-day basis are as follows: 1) a four-day
work week is not customer driven, 2) it is not the norm for
government agencies or most viable businesses to be closed one day
a week, 3) it presents a perception that City government is not
viable and is racked with pain over fiscal constraints that the
City cannot operate five days a week, 4) it is not the image that
the City should be projecting to people that the City hopes to
attract to invest, 5) that the City needed to project that, even in
hard times, the job of City government can and will be performed;
stated that since management took the time and presented a number
of reasons why a five-day work week could not work, he provided the
following reasons how it could succeed: 1) budgetary savings could
be maintained with creative scheduling, 2) cross training, 3) job
sharing, 4) commitment to communication with the public and with
staff while stressing customer service, 5) traffic trip mitigation
could be maintained with creative scheduling, 6) efficient use of
staff could still be maintained by adjusting, adapting and
overcoming, and could be offset by management confidence in
employees, 7) if necessary, management could be contacted by phone,
8) that the provision of longer hours as being an asset of the
four-day work week was mythical, and even with flex scheduling
would require 36 or 38 hours of attendance at work from employees
in a four- or five-day work week, 9) that the extended hours on
Thursdays does not appear to assist the public as anticipated, 10)
that management's challenge was to creatively manage their staff,
which required a commitment to good communication, 11) deadlines
should not be affected by creatively planning the work, 12) that Y-
rates positions [acting position when a lower classification worker
works out of classification in a higher classification] should not
be created, and additional duties assumed under the category of
"other duties" as assigned, 13) that technical training and
thoughtful customer service could alleviate possible
miscommunication with customers; and that the City needed to get
back to basics and provide appropriate customer-driven service to
the community.
Councilman Arnerich spoke in support of Vice Mayor Mannix and a
can-do attitude; stated that when he worked out of his
classification, he was never paid a Y-rate and assumed duties as
other related duties; that citizens are entitled to have services
provided five days a week; and moved that effective January 1,
1996, the Planning, Recreation, and Building Departments resume a
five-day work week, 7.5 hour days, providing it meets with the MOUs
and union contracts, and that the City Manager determine ways to
resume full operation of City Hall effective July 1, 1996, without
trimming the budgets of staff.
Councilmember Lucas spoke in support of the staff recommendation
not to modify the existing four-day work week; stated that she did
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
315
not support Councilman Arnerich's motion nor Vice Mayor Mannix's
comments; that a five-day work week was not an efficient system;
that she had not received any complaints regarding the four-day
work week; that she did not foresee revenue increasing and does not
support giving pay raises; that she desires to retain the City's
excellent staff and believes it to be a benefit to the employees;
that she was impressed with the way the work was being accomplished
during the four-day work week; that the City Manager is working on
reopening the Library six days a week; and that the City Manager's
proposal is excellent.
Councilmember DeWitt stated that one of the duties and functions of
government is to provide service to the citizens and the people
they govern; that the City has budget constraints; that the City
Manager is doing a good job in getting the work done; that he is
not in favor of Vice Mayor Mannix's comments; that he does
understand that the City's primary mission is to provide service
and that the normal period for providing service is a five-day work
week; that because of the budget constraints, he agreed with
Councilman Arnerich with regards to a phase-in type of program; and
that the City can get back to a solid footing without a large,
financial outlay if the five-day work week is phased in.
President Appezzato stated that he was the only Councilmember to
vote against a four-day work week approximately a year ago; that he
will support a return to a five-day work week in some form; that
the votes now exist to accomplish that; and that he looks forward
to how the City Manager plans to implement Council's decision.
The City Manager stated that perhaps the memo was misleading; that
the memo was not intended to show how things cannot work but rather
to show what the impacts are of implementing a change in the
program and how the program can work; that the following four
options were examined: 1) continuing with existing four-day work
week, Fridays off, which was the basis for the City's budget to be
balanced for the current fiscal year, 2) return to the five-day
work week with a 37.5 hour week, which is five days at 7.5 hours
per day for all employees, and is the most expensive option and
costs approximately $250,000 a year, 3) to look at a modification
or phase-in of that which would mean the City would open the
library approximately November 17th, if the work is completed and
believes it will be, which would return the Library from five days
to six days a week, 4) opening the first floor of City Hall,
Recreation, Planning, Building Inspection and Central Permits,
which have the most public contact, on a five-day a week basis with
the employees continuing to work their four days, 36 hours a week,
but staggering their time, which is the least cost of $35,000 to
$40,000 per year, including the utilities, e.g. heating, lighting,
water, fuel for vehicles; 5) going to a flexible work week for all
employees, which is approximately $200,000 on an annual basis,
which retains the four-day work week for the employees but staggers
Regular MerAing, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
6
the day off; that the City does have the adjust, adapt and
overcome, attitude that Vice Mayor Mannix is looking for; that
there are impacts associated with a change in scheduling; that the
department heads provided an honest assessment of what those
impacts would be; elaborated on impacts attributed to City, County
and State economic factors; suggested that Council not proceed with
the most expensive impact; suggested that if Council wishes to
proceed, to phase the process; stated that the City was concerned
about the impact on the public; that the only complaints received
were regarding the Library; and reviewed ACEA and MCEA's previous
and current Agreements.
Following further discussion, the City Manager stated that an
increase in hours requires a Meet and Confer Session.
The City Attorney stated that she understood the proposal is for a
five-day work week, with staff continuing to maintain the working
schedule conditions; that if Council changes the working conditions
including an increase of 4% working hours, the City would be
required to Meet and Confer with each of the bargaining units and
the City could not implement the change immediately; and that the
City could go back to being open five-days a week with staff
working four-days.
In response to Councilman Arnerich's inquiry, the City Manager
stated that the approximate time frame needed to Meet and Confer
would be a month or two.
The City Manager stated that the City would not have to Meet and
Confer; that City Hall could open five-days a week without work
hours changed; however, that if Councilman Arnerich is asking to
increase work hours from 36 to 37.5 hours a week, Meet and Confer
would be required.
In response to Councilman Arnerich, the City Manager stated it was
recommended by the department heads that if Council changes the
work schedule, that Council provide additional clerical support for
when employees are off; and that said impact would be approximately
$40,000, which is the least expensive proposal at this time.
Following discussion, Councilman Arnerich amended his motion to
state: that effective January 1, 1996, the Planning, Recreation,
and Building Departments adhere to a 9-hour day, five-day work
week, with staggered days off, providing it meets with the MOUs and
union contracts, and that the City Manager determine ways to resume
full operation of City Hall effective July 1, 1996, without
trimming the budgets of staff. Councilman DeWitt seconded the
motion.
Councilmember Lucas spoke in opposition to the motion.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
317
Vice Mayor Mannix referred to management's reports and stated that
clerical support could be provided at a lesser cost by utilizing
temporary staff support; and requested that the City Manager keep
costs to a minimum.
Following discussion, the City Clerk stated, for the record, that
the figure referred to by Vice Mayor Mannix pertaining to the
Clerk's budget, had not been provided by that Department.
President Appezzato stated that he does not support the four-day
work week; that the City has many fiscal concerns; that he has not
voted for any major spending initiative, except the remodeling of
City Hall, the East Wing of Historic Alameda High School, the three
fire stations, the computer system for police, and Mastick Senior
Center, and the 2% utility tax to pay for that; that the City needs
the revenue to off-set costs; and that he did not support any other
major spending initiatives.
The motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Arnerich, DeWitt, Vice Mayor Mannix and President
Appezzato - 4. Noes: Councilmember Lucas - 1. Absent: None.
Council recessed at 9:26 p.m. and reconvened at 9:37 p.m.
(95-638) Report from City Manager recommending Acceptance of
a Donation for Installation of a Fountain Within the Right-of-Way
and Establish a Policy for Same. Accepted.
Councilmember Lucas stated she was previously opposed to the
donation; and that she would support said recommendation since Mr.
Jaber has agreed to increase his donation by paying one half of the
maintenance costs up to a maximum of $700 for the first two years.
Councilmember Lucas moved acceptance of the recommendation [accept
donation and authorize expenditure of funds to cover City costs).
Councilmember Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(95-639) Report from Community Development Director
recommending Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development
Administration for Acceptance of a $75,000 Grant Award. Accepted.
Councilmember DeWitt stated that the grant was a benefit to the
City; that the City has several underutilized and vacant buildings
on Webster Street; and the grant should assist the City in
recruiting and hiring someone to assist in rectifying the problems.
Councilmember DeWitt moved acceptance of the recommendation.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
RegulArmn-ring,AWnedaCityCcomicill
October 17, 1995
34.8
(95-640) Report from Public Works Director recommending
Approval of a One-Year Lease with Pacific Shops, Inc. for
Approximately 3.5 Acres of Tideland Trust Property at 2033 Clement
Avenue. Accepted as amended.
Don Roberts, Alameda, spoke in opposition to staff's
recommendation; stated that the City will ultimately only net
$5,000 per year from said lease; and that Pacific Shops should pay
$105,000 for a one-year lease for the City's 3-1/2 acres of
developed water-front land.
Shirley Cummins, Alameda, spoke in opposition to staff's
recommendation; stated that water-front property is considered
prime; and questioned staff's rational for determining costs of
said lease.
President Appezzato recommended that sub-paragraph 4 under Other
Lease Terms and Conditions of the staff report be deleted.
The Public Works Director stated that he spoke with the General
Manager, Bureau of Electricity; that Mr. Lewis was concerned that
the lease would be short-term and the Bureau of .Electricity would
have to spend money to improve the property and not get
[appropriate] value from same; that Mr. Lewis spoke with the Navy
and that they are willing to give Mr. Lewis license agreement
extensions on a yearly basis; and that there was no need to have
sub-paragraph 4 in the lease.
The City Manager stated that sub-paragraph 4 was placed in the
lease because it was responding to a request from the Public
Utility Board President; it was to provide an option, not a
mandate, so that the Bureau would not be forced out of its existing
storage location without a place to go.
President Appezzato stated that he understood the City Manager's
concern, but believed they were separate issues and should not be
combined.
In response to Vice Mayor Mannix's inquiry, the City Manager stated
that the effective date of the lease would be upon execution of the
agreement, which would happen within a few days if. Council approved
it today.
In response to Vice Mayor Mannix, the City Manager stated that it
was the intent of staff to continue negotiating the long-term
lease.
Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of the recommendation [find
that the proposed lease is statutorily exempt under Section 15261
of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines,
"Ongoing project being carried out by a public agency •which was
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
3i9
approved prior to November 23, 1970,"; approve the lease, as
amended, in the form substantially similar to the draft Tidelands
Lease or with any changes deemed appropriate by the Council; and
authorize the City Manager to execute same]. Vice Mayor Mannix
seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(95-641) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing Execution of
Third Amendment to Tideland Lease with Alameda Gateway, Ltd.
Introduced.
President Appezzato stated that the lease returns the Ferry
Terminal property to the City which was the most important factor
in the Third Amendment to the Lease.
Vice Mayor Mannix moved introduction of the Ordinance.
Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote -5.
(95-642) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing City Manager to
Execute a Non-Exclusive Easement Agreement with Metricom, Inc. for
Space on City Light Standards. Introduced.
Councilman Arnerich stated that a camera box was installed on the
light pole on the corner of Walnut and Central.
Councilmember Lucas moved introduction of the Ordinance.
Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
(95-643) Final Passage of Ordinance Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 8-7.9 (Heavy Commercial
Vehicles) of Section 8-7 (Parking Prohibitions) of Chapter VIII
(Traffic and Motor Vehicles), Thereof, Restricting Heavy Commercial
Vehicles from Parking in Driveways. Finally Adopted.
Councilmember Lucas moved final passage of the Ordinance. Vice
Mayor Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment)
(95-644) Neil Patrick Sweeney, Alameda, stated that the City
Council should continue to pursue a second UCSF campus in 1996.
(95-645) Don Bergen, Alameda, stated that the City Council
should denounce Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.
(95-646) John Scott Graham, Alameda, stated that he was
concerned about Social Security cuts.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
350
(95-647) Shirley Cummins, Alameda, stated that she did not
believe the world was going to let the Navy Base go away, e.g.
recent acts by Russia and Korea; that Vice Mayor Mannix did not
talk long enough on the modified work week; and commented on her
work experience, e.g. long hours, at a hospital in Oakland.
7. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council)
(95-648) Consideration of Adjourning Regular Council Meeting
of Tuesday, November 7, 1995, to Wednesday, November 8, 1995, due
to November Election. Adjourned to November 7, 1995.
Following discussion, Vice Mayor Mannix moved that the Regular
Council Meeting remain as scheduled for Tuesday, November 7, 1995,
at 7:30 p.m. Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(95-649) Consideration of Mayor's nomination(s) for
appointment to the Mayor's Transportation Systems Management
Committee. Nominated.
President Appezzato nominated and appointed Lynda Olson as Citizen-
at-Large Members, Carl Anderson (representing the Food and Drug
Administration [FDA] in Harbor Bay Business Park - a large
employer), and Don Kechly (representing College of Alameda - a
"center").
(95-650) Vice Mayor Mannix requested a status report on the
BFI Bike Bridge.
(95-651) Vice Mayor Mannix requested that the meeting be
adjourned in memory of John Weber, retired Police Officer.
(95-652) Councilmember DeWitt requested a status report on the
Community Policing Program.
(95-653) Councilman Arnerich requested that the meeting be
adjourned in memory of James Turner, former Alameda principal.
Regular Mooting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995
351
8. ADJOURNMENT
(95-654) President Appezzato adjourned the meeting at 10:13
p.m. in memory of John Weber and James Turner.
Respectfully submitted,
The agenda for this meeting was posted in advance in accordance
with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council
October 17, 1995