Loading...
1995-11-21 Regular CC Minutes3" 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 21, 1995 The meeting convened at 7:31 p.m., with Mayor Appezzato presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember DeWitt. Reverend Don Taylor, Central Baptist Church, gave the invocation. ROLL CALL - PRESENT: Councilmembers Arnerich, DeWitt, Vice Mayor Mannix and President Appezzato - 4. ABSENT: Councilmember Lucas - 1. PROCLAMATIONS AND SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY None. CONSENT CALENDAR President Appezzato stated that the following items were pulled for public discussion : 4-D (95-707) [Report from Fire Chief Recommending Award of Contract in the Amount of $66,225.83 to Signal Division, Federal Signal Corporation for Five (5) Electromechanical Outdoor Warning Sirens]; and 4-H (95-708) [Resolution "Establishing Free Three-Hour Parking for Park Street Business District Meters on December 2, 1995, Hometown Holidays"]. Vice Mayor Mannix moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk. (*95-699) Minutes of the Special and Regular Council Meetings of November 7, 1995. Approved. (*95-700) Report from City Attorney Requesting Approval of City's Response to 1994-1995 Alameda County Grand Jury Report. Accepted. (*95-701) Report from Finance Director Transmitting Investment. Portfolio for Period Ending October 31, 1995. Accepted. See Paragraph (95-707). Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 371 ( *95 -702) Report from Public Works Director Recommending Award of Contract to Buestad Construction, Inc. for Accessibility Upgrade for the West End Library, No. P.W. 09- 95 -17. Accepted. ( *95 -703) Report from Public Works Director Recommending Acceptance of Work by Daylen, Inc. for Tee Renovations at the Chuck Corica Golf Complex, No. P.W. 01- 95 -02. Accepted. ( *95 -704) Resolution No. 12711 "Authorizing Execution of State -Local Transportation Partnership Program (SB 300) Agreement, No. SLTPP -5014 and Program Supplement No. 005 (Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 17)." Adopted. See Paragraph (95 -708). ( *95 -705) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 2- 9.4(a) (Commission Powers, Duties) of Section 2 -9 (City Golf Commission), Chapter II (Administration), Thereof, Reflecting New Management Organization at Golf Complex. Introduced. ( *95 -706) Bills, certified by the City Manager to be true and correct, were ratified in the sum of $1,285,474.20. Ratified. (95 -707) Report from Fire Chief Recommending Award of Contract in the Amount of $66,225.83 to Signal Division, Federal Signal Corporation for Five (5) Electromechanical Outdoor Warning Sirens, Plus Authorize a 10% Contingency. Accepted. Robert Nicol, Alameda, stated that the electromechanical outdoor warning sirens did not provide adequate warning capabilities for the hearing impaired. The City Manager stated that the matter would be investigated. Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of staff's recommendation. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. (95 -708) Written Communication from Gail Olaysen, Project Manager, Park Street Business Association, Requesting that the Parking Meters on Park Street, from Lincoln Avenue to San Jose, be Free from 11:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. during the Hometown Holiday Celebration to be held on December 2, 1995; and related Resolution No. 12712 "Establishing Free Three -Hour Parking for Park Street Business District Meters on December 2, 1995, Hometown Holidays." Adopted. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 372 President Appezzato noted that the West Alameda Business Association (WABA) was not included in the Resolution, and suggested Council direct the City Manager to provide WABA the same privilege, if WABA so desired. Vice Mayor Mannix so moved. Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -4. Following discussion, the Public Works Director stated that the Resolution included the whole Park Street Business District area, which expanded PSBA's request for specific streets. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (95-709) Resolution No. 12713 "Appointing Anne E. Cook as a Member of the City Economic Development Commission." (Marine/Waterfront Seat) Adopted. Councilmember DeWitt moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Ms. Cook. (95-710) Resolution No. 12714 "Appointing Bonnie J. McKean as a Member of the City Economic Development Commission." (Community- at-Large Seat) Adopted. Councilmember DeWitt moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Ms. McKean. (95-711) Michael Richards, President, Alamedans for a Better City (ABC), submitting Petitions Requesting a One-Year Moratorium on "Infill" Until the November 1996 Election, so That People Can Voice Their Position. Accepted. Martha Louise Caron, Alamedans for a Better City (ABC) and representing Mr. Richards, stated that the quality of residential neighborhoods has been an issue even before the passage of Measure A in 1973; she addressed repercussions due to density; stated that the infill policy is directly accountable for the loss of historical and neighborly characteristics of Alameda; that ABC is not against development nor affordable housing; that ABC is against a policy which takes a single unit lot and allows three or more units in violation of Measure A; that ABC is against a policy which. condones construction of units that look like Motel 6 rather than units which adopt the architectural flavor of historical neighborhoods; that ABC is against a policy which condones code Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 3 7 S violations and encourages variances simply because it has allowed violation of these laws in the past; that ABC is against permitting all such policies without citizen input; requested a mission statement for Alameda that commits to neighborhoods; requested a moratorium for one year; suggested that the City take the following steps this year to reverse the downward slide: 1) direct staff to study and report on actual land use density in Alameda; 2) meet with ABAG to review changes in demographics since 1988 to update "fair share" requirements; 3) direct City Attorney to explore renegotiation of the Guyton settlement which requires 930 more units as Alameda's "fair share" of affordable housing; 4) start immediate revision of the Housing Element with public input; 5) amend the General Plan and the Housing Element immediately so that the Naval Air Station (NAS) is integrated and meets the same requirements as the rest of the City, before the Base Plan is final; 6) require a Housing Element reflecting the residential configuration of the main island and Harbor Bay Isle [Bay Farm Island] for NAS, so not one part of the City experiences disproportionate residential density; 7) establish a City policy that shifts the emphasis from subsidizing low-income rentals to low-income home ownership; 8) conduct an open space review emphasizing public parks and green spaces for inclusion in the new Housing Element; 9) eliminate fee waivers and variances as a method of attracting new development; 10) retain the current Development Code, particularly residential zoning, to preclude any increase in residential density; 11) direct the Historical Advisory Board to conduct a comprehensive up-to-date survey of historical residences which should be preserved as part of the City's heritage and policy; 12) require an independent and unbiased outside audit to identity existing violations of Measure A; 13) adopt a policy that variances shall only be considered in exigent circumstances affecting public health and welfare, and shall not be considered for personal economic hardship; 14) adopt a policy that zoning and building code violations occurring without permit approval shall result in restoration of the structure to its prior condition; 15) establish an architectural policy which requires that all proposed development and rehabilitation reflect the design characteristics of the existing structure and be consistent with the neighborhood; and 16) eliminate the infill policy of the Housing Element; stated that additions to the housing stock should be accomplished with said policies in mind; submitted petitions; and presented the Mayor and City Council with T-shirts. In response to Councilmember DeWitt's inquiry, the City Manager stated that the City is required to have a General Plan that is updated on a regular basis; that the Housing Element of the General Plan is required by State law to be updated every five years; that the State provides a fair share housing allocation to each Council of Government; that the City's Council of Government is the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), which has a contract with the State to provide the fair share housing allocations to Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 374 each of the 99 jurisdictions in the Bay Area; that after the fair share housing allocation is provided to a jurisdiction, it is required to provide a strategy for meeting certain housing goals in very low-, low-, moderate- and above moderate-[income] categories; that Alameda's Housing Element provides several strategies for providing that housing; one of the strategies is infill, which was a decision made by Council in the early 1980's; that the thinking then was rather than concentrating low-income housing in one place, to spread it throughout the City; that the City is required to update the Housing Element by June 30, 1997; at that time, the City must assess the needs of each housing category and come up with strategies to meet those needs; that Council can determine strategies at that time to meet allocations; that one strategy could be infill, or Council could decide against an infill category; that during the last five years, the City has assisted property owners with approximately 20 units; that there were probably other infill units by private property owners which did not receive City assistance; and that Council could determine that infill not be used as a housing strategy. In response to Councilmember DeWitt's inquiry, the Planning Director stated that the Housing Element identifies a little more than 900 units that the City must provide in order to meet the City's very low- and low-income categories; that the City has already provided a portion of said housing; that the 300 units of housing built at the Navy Base in the early 1990's are units the City counts towards meeting that fair share and in compliance with the City's Housing Element; that in order to have the provisions of the Guyton Settlement satisfied and the Court oversight eliminated, the City has to meet the fair share allocations for very low- and low-income [individuals]. The City Attorney elaborated that there is a Guyton Settlement Agreement and a Guyton Court Order; that the Guyton Court Order required that the City assist in 34 new housing units; that said units have been identified and funds have been encumbered, so there is no further obligation of the City to provide any new housing units under the Guyton Court Order; that under the Guyton Settlement Agreement, there is no obligation for the City to do anything in terms of infill, construction, assistance or any obligation; that there are a few remaining obligations regarding the Guyton Settlement Agreement that do remain [in effect] until the City has satisfied its 1995 ABAG numbers, such as keeping in place the affordable housing fee, the substantial rehab program, and the City programs which facilitate low- and very low-income housing; that there is no obligation for the City to do anything further under either the [Guyton] Settlement Agreement or Court Order; and that the City has satisfied its affirmative obligations. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 375 In response to Councilmember DeWitt's inquiry, the City Attorney stated that the City has no additional infill requirements at this time; that the Housing Element requires a number of different categories; that housing could be provided by city or private property owners; and that the [Housing Element] does not specify how or by whom the housing needs are to be facilitated, just that it be done sometime by someone. President Appezzato stated that there is obviously a great deal of information regarding this issue that needs to be gathered and provided to Council; that this is definitely a land use issue; that the City has a Planning Board; that this may be an issue the Council should consider sending to the Planning Board; that if Council desires, the following are issues he would like the Planning Board to consider: 1) Origin of infill housing and its impact on the City over the past few years; 2) How it relates to both Measures [A]; 3) How it relates to the Clayton Guyton Settlement; 4) How it would affect people's property rights; and 5) What are the legal ramifications of a moratorium. Councilmember DeWitt stated that the request seemed to have covered quite a few items that appear to be more than what the Planning Board would be involved with; and agreed that the matter should be referred for additional study to the Planning Department and Planning Board. Vice Mayor Mannix moved that the Petitions be accepted; that the matter be referred to the Planning Board for review and recommendation, including the consideration of: 1) Origin of infill housing and its impact on the City over the past few years; 2) How it relates to both Measures [A]; 3) How it relates to the Clayton Guyton Settlement; 4) How it would affect people's property rights; and 5) What are the legal ramifications of a moratorium; and directed staff to review ABC's recommendations [1) direct staff to study and report on actual land use density in Alameda; 2) meet with ABAG to review changes in demographics since 1988 to update "fair share" requirements; 3) direct City Attorney to explore renegotiation of the Guyton settlement which requires 930 more units as Alameda's "fair share" of affordable housing; 4) start immediate revision of the Housing Element with public input; 5) amend the General Plan and the Housing Element immediately so that the Naval Air Station (NAS) is integrated and meets the same requirements as the rest of the City, before the Base Plan is final; 6) require a Housing Element reflecting the residential configuration in the main island and in Harbor Bay Isle [Bay Farm Island] for NAS, so not one part of the City experiences disproportionate residential density; 7) establish a City policy that shifts the emphasis from subsidizing low-income rentals to low-income home ownership; 8) conduct an open space review' emphasizing public parks and green spaces for inclusion in the new Housing Element; 9) eliminate fee waivers and variances as a method Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 3'76 of attracting new development; 10) retain the current Development Code, particularly residential zoning, to preclude any increase in residential density; 11) direct the Historical Advisory Board to conduct a comprehensive up-to-date survey of historical residences which should be preserved as part of the City's heritage and policy; 12) require an independent and unbiased outside audit to identity existing violations of Measure A; 13) adopt a policy that variances shall only be considered in exigent circumstances affecting public health and welfare, and shall not be considered for personal economic hardship; 14) adopt a policy that zoning and building code violations occurring without permit approval shall result in restoration of the structure to its prior condition; 15) establish an architectural policy which requires that all proposed development and rehabilitation reflect the design characteristics of the existing structure and be consistent with the neighborhood; and 16) eliminate the infill policy of the Housing Element] for a report back to Council. Councilman Arnerich spoke in support of referring the matter to the Planning Board for consideration and possible incorporation into the Development Code; stated that no action should be taken at this time; that a one-year moratorium should not be exercised; and seconded the motion. Councilmember DeWitt stated that staff did not have the time to study issue [before it going to Council]; that infill is currently being provided by individual residents; and expressed concern for the matter during the interim study period. President Appezzato stated that he was not prepared to vote for a moratorium. Councilman Arnerich stated that he did not believe many homes were being developed under those conditions; that during the last year, approximately 20 homes have been affected in this manner; and that the City should monitor individuals who apply for changes. Councilmember DeWitt stated that, in the interim, the City should make sure that current Codes, variance requests and architectural requirements are reviewed strictly by the Planning Department. President Appezzato suggested that Ms. Caron, Mr. Richards and concerned citizens attend the Planning Board hearings so that all information can be presented. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. (95-712) Report from Assistant City Manager transmitting Status Report on Entry Way to Golf Complex. Accepted. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 377 Councilman Arnerich stated that the only detrimental view is the entrance way to the Golf Complex which is clouded by a fire tower and old sheds that have been there since 1940; that a rough estimate was received for $30,000 to demolish the fire tower; and inquired whether a controlled burn of the fire tower could be conducted. In response to Councilman Arnerich's inquiry, the Fire Chief stated that it could be done [controlled burn of the fire tower]; and that the City could apply to the Regional Air Quality Control Board. Councilman Arnerich moved acceptance of the report; and suggested that the City Manager work with the Fire Chief regarding application to the Regional Air Quality Control Board. President Appezzato noted that the report had been referred to the Golf Commission for review and input. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion. President Appezzato requested the following be considered by the Golf Commission: 1) cost; 2) funding for driving range and cart paths; and 3) priorities. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. (95-713) Report from Public Works Director regarding Alameda County's Park Street Bridge Closure For Rehabilitation Project. Accepted. Don Wagg, Alameda, inquired if the City was considering the closure of the Park Street Bridge for a long duration of time. President Appezzato responded that the County was considering closing the Park Street Bridge for maintenance for a period between 70 to 105 days; that he and Vice Mayor Mannix participated in a meeting with Wilma Chan, County Supervisor; the County Director of Public Works, and various groups regarding the matter; that the result of the meeting was that the County would go back to consider options on how to complete the maintenance work; and that the County currently has the matter under engineering study to make a recommendation. Mr. Wagg spoke in support of maintaining the Bridge; in opposition to closing the Bridge completely; expressed the importance of the corridor; and suggested that Council urge the County to keep a minimum of two lanes open. President Appezzato stated that County Supervisor Chan is taking the lead; that Council's preference is for one lane to remain open Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 8 in each direction; and that the second option is to conduct the maintenance work during the months of January, February and March, after the Christmas season. Monroe Wingate, owner of Park Street Landing, representing 14 merchants, stated that all merchants are extremely concerned; that the merchants agree that the Bridge is in need of repair; and spoke in support of the Bridge remaining open. President Appezzato stated that it was the City's number one priority to keep the Bridge open; and that maintenance work performed in 1997 would give the City ample time to publicize the one-lane closure and conduct a media blitz to alert the entire region about the matter. Stan Tang, restaurant tenant located near the Bridge, expressed concerns regarding impacts of Bridge closure and maintenance work; and spoke in opposition to closing the Park Street Bridge. Jim Thompson, Alameda Collision Repairs, stated that it was imperative that a minimum of two lanes remain open during the rehabilitation project. David Brown, representing Wilma Chan, County Supervisor, stated that Supervisor Chan and the County Public Works Director understood the impacts on businesses; that the County would do everything possible to keep the Bridge open; that engineering capabilities could accomplish the task; that the County expects a report on December 14th and was considering outside, independent engineering firms to review and study the report and provide recommendations; that the County will make every attempt to keep two lanes of traffic open, but that it was not going to be easy given the financial constraints; that the other constraint was the County must advertise project by January to ensure Federal funding is not lost; that the County was not aware until one month ago of the High Street Bridge renovation problems; that until such time, the County had anticipated two lanes of traffic being open on the Park Street Bridge; and that the County would do its best with the information obtained and capabilities. President Appezzato stated that he had received a letter from Michael Dosen, Vice President, Harsch Investment Corp., addressed to Supervisor Chan, and Alameda County Director of Public Works, regarding the Park Street Bridge Closure Meeting held November 16, 1995, and requested that it be noted in the record. Councilman Arnerich stated that the City could not afford to have the Bridge closed for any duration of time. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 379 Vice Mayor Mannix stated that engineers tend to be project driven; that engineers on the project must not lose sight of the business and human impacts of said project; that the impacts need to be emphasized in the City's negotiations; and moved acceptance of the report and recommendation [direct the City Manager to negotiate appropriate mitigations with the County prior to the County advertising for bids, and that in the event that a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the County, the City Manager directed to return to City Council for further direction]. Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion. President Appezzato stated that a member of the public wished to address the Council after the public comment portion of the meeting was closed. Councilmember DeWitt moved that public comments be taken. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion. Councilman Arnerich stated that he was not receptive to reopening public discussion after the fact unless pertinent information was provided that could change the vote. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. Barry Pries, owner of Pries Motors, spoke in opposition to the Park Street Bridge being closed. Vice Mayor Mannix's motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. (95-714) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 4-10.5 (Prohibited Acts), Subsection 4-10.7 (Special Provisions-Exceptions) and Subsection 4- 10.10 (Appeals) of Section 4-10 (Noise Control), Article II (Noise Regulations), Chapter IV (Offenses and Public Safety), Thereof, Regulating Construction Hours and Prohibiting Construction on Sundays. Amended and introduced. Councilmember DeWitt stated that he received a telephone call from a citizen concerned that individual homeowners might be precluded from doing maintenance-type construction on their houses after 5:00 p.m. and on weekends; that he [DeWitt] is in support of having a restriction on the large construction companies; and suggested that an exemption be added to the Ordinance to allow homeowners to work on their principle residence. President Appezzato stated that he does not believe the Ordinance applies to construction work by homeowners not requiring [City] permits. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 380 In response to President Appezzato, Councilmember DeWitt stated that there are situations where a permit is required and a homeowner is doing the work; and that even homeowners [working on their principle residence] with a permit should be exempted. The City Manager reviewed the proposed Municipal Code amendments and exemptions. Vice Mayor Mannix stated that he shared Councilmember DeWitt's concern; and also suggested that the construction hours notated for Saturday also be applied to Sunday. President Appezzato stated that a member of the public wished to address the Council after the public comment portion of the meeting was closed. Vice Mayor Mannix moved that public comments be taken. Councilmember DeWitt seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember DeWitt, Vice Mayor Mannix and President Appezzato - 3. Noes: Councilman Arnerich - 1. Absent: Councilmember Lucas - 1. Don Olney, Alameda, stated that he has been working on his residence for more than a year; and spoke in support of restricted hours being applied to Sunday to allow construction. Councilmember DeWitt moved introduction of the Ordinance; and an amendment to add exemption (d) "or a homeowner working on their principle residence". Vice Mayor Mannix suggested an amendment to the motion to include a "personal permitted project" [exemption] for property owners working on their rental properties on weekends. Councilmember DeWitt agreed to the amendment and stated that the City should be encouraging beautification and repairs. Vice Mayor Mannix seconded the motion. Councilman Arnerich spoke in support of proposed restricted construction hours on Saturday and Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and stated that without a time frame there could be no enforcement. Councilmember DeWitt stated that the intended motion was to exempt individual homeowners working on their principle residence [or rental property]. Councilman Arnerich inquired how the person who wants to get rest is then protected; and spoke in support of a time frame. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 381 Councilmember DeWitt stated that the Noise Ordinance would continue to be adhered to. Councilman Arnerich stated that there should be some type of time restriction for individual homeowners and/or contractors. Following discussion, the City Manager clarified that the proposed amended motion was to leave the existing exemptions in place, to add an additional exemption [property owner working on their principle residence or rental property]; and that said owners could work anytime as long as the Noise Ordinance was not violated. Following discussion, the City Attorney clarified the existing Noise Ordinance; and stated that added exemption would state that any homeowner, on his/her principle residence or rental property, can work around the clock, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, provided that it does not create a noise disturbance; and that there is still a prohibition on the decibel level. The City Manager stated that the current Noise Ordinance covers any form of noise regardless of its source. Vice Mayor Mannix clarified that the motion is intended to not change what currently exists for private property owners, and to not over legislate the matter; and that the proposed Ordinance would address developers and large construction companies without impacting the small person. President Appezzato stated that he did not believe the City has received complaints on individual homeowners but rather on major construction projects. The motion [to amend and introduce the Ordinance (Amendment: Exempt homeowners and owners of rental property)] carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. (95-715) Resolution No. 12715 "Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Rental Agreement with Respect to City-Owned Land on Atlantic Avenue Between Webster Street and Constitution Way for the Sale of Holiday Trees." Adopted. Vice Mayor Mannix moved adoption of the Resolution; and requested that the City Manager, or his designee, meet with the operator to ensure that any safety hazards are mitigated. Councilman Arnerich seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) (95-716) Neil Patrick Sweeney, Alameda, suggested that UCSF's . research hospital be relocated to the Alameda Naval Base. Regular Meeting, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995 )U (95-717) Andrew McCormack, Alameda, commented on issues regarding the restoration of his historic home, The Webster House Bed and Breakfast, on Versailles Avenue; and expressed frustration in dealing with the Planning Department. President Appezzato requested that the City Manager work with Mr. and Mrs. McCormack to address said issues; and that Council be provided status of all issues. (95-718) Susan M. McCormack, Alameda, spoke in opposition to a bill in the amount of $980.51 from the Planning Department for the review of plans by the Historical Advisory Board (HAB); stated that no previous costs were incurred for HAB's review; questioned the necessity for, and costs of the plan re-check; reviewed the Planning Department's remodeling suggestions; expressed frustration with the Planning Department, restoration process, and interpreting Municipal and Zoning Codes; complained that a bill for a Certificate of Approval was not computed correctly; and requested the City Council's assistance in resolving said matters. President Appezzato requested that the City Council review the matter and report back to the City Council. (95-719) Kate Pryor, Alameda, submitted petition of 408 signatures in opposition to closing the Park Street Bridge during the repair process. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (Communications from Council) (95-720) Councilmember DeWitt commended Councilmember Lucas and the West Alameda Business Association for their participation in creating a successful Farmers' Market on Central Avenue; and stated that today was the last day of operation until next year. ADJOURNMENT p.m. (95-721) President Appezzato adjourned the meeting at 9:24 Respectfully submitted, Dr B. 'ELSCH, CMC City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular MectiOg, Alameda City Council November 21, 1995