Loading...
1976-08-03 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY - - - - - - - - - - - - - AUGUST 3, 1976 The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Diament and was followed by an Invocation delivered by the Reverend Alonzo Price, Master of Divinity, Christ Episcopal Church. ROLL CALL: The roll was called and Councilmen 8eokam, Diament, Hurwitz, Sherratt and President Corica, (5), were noted present. Absent: None. MINUTES: I. The minutes of the regular meeting held July 20, were approved as submitted. Councilman Beckum requested the minutes of the special meeting with the Social Service Board held July 12, be amended to reflect the suggestion that Santa Barbara's goals be provided to the Board to aid them in their study; the City Attorney requested that, on page two, paragraph three, the word 'appointed" be removed and the word "guiding" be substituted. The minutes were then approved as amended. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: 2. From Mr. and Mrs. Stephen S. Slauson, 2426 Otis Drive, requesting revocable encroachment permit to occupy portion of city right of way under fence located on Park Avenue side of property. Councilman Sherratt moved the request be denied and the matter referred to the City Engineer to follow through with his recommendation the fence be moved back. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried unanimously on voice vote. 3. From Mr. and Mrs. Willis Ayars, 936-938 Pacific Avenue, requesting revocable permit to encroach three feet into city right Of way in order to complete a landscaping/brick enclosure. The request was referred to staff for report and recommendation. 4. From Mr. Otto W. Sammet, 2624 Janis Circle, concerning swimming pool and tennis instruction operations conducted on property at 2619 Santa Clara Avenue owned by Mr. and Mrs. Edward Murphy Of 2618 Janis Circle. President Corica reported the Planning Department had investigated the situation and had found no violations of city ordinances. Mr, Sammet elaborated on his written communication and reviewed the hisotry of the tennis instruction operations and charged the tennis courts had been expanded without appropriate permits. Planning Director Patterson reported Assistant Planning Director Bob Venable, now retired, had investigated and found no violations. The Planning Department had investigated and responded again on February 26, 1976, reporting no violations. After furthdr discussion, the Council directed staff to triple check the situation and report, in wr1tirg, to both the Council and Mr. Sammet. 5. ' From Mr. Charles A. Tillman, 2415 Roosevelt Drive, suggesting changes to Ordinance NV, I696, New Series, establishing Golf Commission and prescribing membership and duties. Mr. Tillman commented on his request for changes in Ordinance No. 1696, New Series, which created the Golf Commission. He expressed support of the two-term limit for Board and Commission members He suggested the composition of the Commission be amended to delete the ex-officio members and enlarge the membership to seven, and a woman and older person be added. President Corica commented that much of the success of the Golf Courses and Commission was due to Jack Clark, sports editor of the Alameda Times-Star and expressed the Council's openness about appointing people to Boards and Commissions. On question from Councilman Sherratt, Councilman Hurwitz responded that the ex-officio members of the Commission had no vote and he felt it would be a good idea for a Councilmember to be an ex-officio member of every Board and Commission. He expressed his opposition to designating specific membership on any Boards and Commissions. On question by Councilman Beckam, the City Attorney stated that, according to the Charter, the Mayor is considered a member of the Council for the purpose of exercising his vote, and therefore, there is no problem with the language of the ordinance. After further discussion, Councilman Sherratt moved that, because the Commission had undertaken several significant projects, the question of changing the Commission membership be tabled at this time. The motion was seconded by Councilnan Diament and carried unanimously on voice vote. O. From Mrs. Dorothy Allen, I020 Pacific Avenue, concerning Housing Element and Uniform Housing Code. President Croica reported a report was being prepared for the Community Relations Commission, and Mrs. Allen, as a member, would be receiving a copy as soon as they were available. 7. From the Alameda Chamber of Commerce, signed by Mr. Andrew J. Pagano, President, offering Chamber assistance in matters pertaining to business community during the coming year. Mr. Pagano expressed the Chamber's willingness to work with the City and requested ai/ance information on any item which would affect the business community. President Corica reported that he and other members of the Council were looking forward to working with him during the coming year. The communication was received. 8. From American National Red Cross, Alameda Chapter, signed by Executive Director, requesting donation of unclaimed recovered articles in police storage for auction. President Corica reported the Municipal Code prohibited donation of unclimaed articles. The communication was accepted. 9. From Mrs. R.E. Stone, 1623 High Street, regarding Lincoln School access road and traffic problems. Mrs. Stone stated she did approve of the access road, and stated no improvement in the traffic situation had been made since the Council's action in January, 1975, which referred the extension to the Planning Board for an amendment to the General Plan. She stated she had contacted homeowners' and neighborhood associations for their response to the issue. She stated that, when the matter comes before the Council again, if the extension of Fernside is not approved, it will be necessary to go to the ballot in order to resolve the situation. She stated she had support from homeowners in Garden Isle, Deauville Condominium, the Willows, Bayview Estates, Ravens Cove and Casitas. She reiterated the traffic problems and recommendations from various professionals and asked that the Council deal quickly and fairly with the problem. President Corica stated the Combined Land Use, Circulation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan are expected in October and hearings will be scheduled at that time to address this and other issues. Councilman Sherratt noted the Fernside Extension was not being considered tonight; the item on the agenda was the access road. President Corica stated that, since Mrs. Stone had indicated there were some others wishing to speak on the subject, the Council was obligated to hear them. Mrs. Anita Weier, 34 Garden Road, stated she believed the extension would be a logical completion of the city's traffic system. Mr. Joseph Cervelli, 3300 Encinal Avenue, reported the Planning Board's action approving the extension was based on the Trend Plan, and stated the Trend Plan does not show a Fernside Extension. Mr. Lou Wilson, 3280 Thompson, spoke against the extension of Fernside Boulevard. President Corica repeated the matter of the Fernside extension would be considered when the Land Use Circulation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan are received. Mr. Joseph Sullivan, 3221 Liberty Avenue, commented the access road to the school had been compli- cated by another issue and urgd the Council to allow a referendum on the extension of Fernside Boulevard. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 10. From Board of Education, signed by Mr. Ian Weber, President, requesting all items pertaining to Lincoln School access roadway, storm drain system and sewer system, be considered at this meeting. Councilman Beckam stated that, though he did not have a conflict of interest, he wished to declare himself in conflict because he lived on Fernside Boulevard and would abstain from comment on this item, and suggested someone determine the purpose of the proposed additional two lanes for the Bay Farm Island Bridge. Councilman Hurwitz stated it was most unfortunate the two issues were mixed together rather than considering just the access road question tonight. Councilman Sherratt moved the report be approved and the resolution authorizing the agreement be considered out of order. The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament. Planning Director Patterson reported the Planning Board, at its meeting of August 2, stated the Lincoln School access road is in compliance with the adopted General Plan, as speified by Govern- ment Code Section 65402, and confirmed the Council had previously approved plans for construction which showed the street connecting only to Washington Street. The motion passed on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstaining: Councilman Beckan, (1). There being no objection, the meeting proceeded to "Resolutions'. RESOLUTIONS: 11. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8568 Authorizing Execution of Agreement with Alameda Unified School District Relating to Construction and Maintenance of Lincoln School Access Roadway, Storm Drain and Sewer System and Certifying Review of Environmental Impact Report for Said Project." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstaining: Councilman Beckam, (1). The meeting returned to the regular order of business. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 12' From the City Manager recommending contract be award to Gallagher & Burk, Inc. low bidder, for project of construction of access road to Lincoln School from Encinal Avenue to Washington Street, Councilman Sherratt moved acceptance of the report and award of the bid as r8CUm0end2d. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: None. Abstaining: Councilman Beckam, (1). A five-minute recess was called. Upon reconvening, the meeting continued with the regular order Of business. 13. From the City Manager concerning proposed Charter Amendments. The City Manager briefly reviewed his report which consisted of proposed Charter amendments first discussed prior to the June election, as well as other s proposed by citizens and members of the Council, and included his memo dated February 10, 1976. He noted that measures 1, 3 and 5 through 8 were OOibe June ballot. He suggested direction be given to the City Attorney to prepare the required resolutions for consideration at the meeting of August 17, in order to meet the County's deadline of August 20. Measure No. 2 suggested a new section be added to allow the City to contract with Alameda County for property assessment and tax collection services. As there are no apparent legal obstacles in the Charter to proceeding with this arrangement, it was the consensus of the Council that this measure need not be included on the ballot. Measure No. 4 proposed to delete the section outlining the duties of the Social Service Board and prescribe their duties by OrdiUuDcp. The measure was deleted from the June ballot at the request of the Board as they were in the process Of reviewing their duties and objectives. After discussion and comments from Mrs. Margaret Howard, President of the Board, and Mrs. Darlene Banda, Chairman of the Re-evaluation Subcommittee, the Council declined to place this measure on the ballot at this time and will reconsider when the goals have been developed. Measure No. 9: would limit elective offices, with the exception of the Auditor and Treasurer to two complete consecutive terms, After discussion of expanding this measure to include appointments to Boards and C00misSiOns, it was the consensus of the Council that only the issue of the two-term limit for Mayor and Coundmen be placed on the ballot. Measure No. 10 covered a method of filling a vacancy in an elective Office. It was the consensus Of the Council that the current Charter provision is adequate. Measures Nos. 11-I3 cover the specific instance when an incumbent Councilman is elected Mayor thereby leaving a vacant Council seat. Measure No. 11 would prescribe that the person receiving the next highest number of votes be appOint2ck No. 12 would provide for a conditional Council seat to be placed on the ballot; and NV. 13 would provide for casting ballots for one more Council seat than otherwise would be vacant. The City Attorney stated the suggestion that a CoUnCihaO running for Mayor be required to resign from the Council seat is probably unconstitutional. After further discussion of these complicated alternatives, it was the consensus of the Council that adoption of any of the provisions would present a complicated and possibly confusing ballot to the elector, and therefore none of these measures are to be on the November ballot. Measure No. 14 would remove residency requirements of certain appointed City officials in order to confirm the Charter to the State Constitution. Though the current provision creates no hardship on any of the officials involved, the measure is to be included on the ballot. Additional measures proposed by citiznes and/Dr members of the Council: Election of Councilmen by Districts had been discussed at various times in the past. It was the consensus of the Council that since the districting question had not generated a great deal of support, the matter would not be pursued at this time. Adjusting salaries for Councilmen, which had been discussed in the past, was mentioned in connection with incorporating provisions of general state law. The Council decided this matter should not be included on the ballot. Reducing majority requirement to remove certain City officials was discussed. Reducing the number Of votes required to remove an appointed officals from four to three votes was de termined by the Council to be unnecessary. iLCJ Electing two Councilmen at each Municipal Election could be accomplished by making one of the Council seats vacant in March, 1977, a two-year rather than a four-year term. The Councilmen elected with the fewest number of votes would be the one elected to the two-year term. It was the consensus of the Council this measure be included on the ballot. Council appointment of members of Boards and Commissions was thoroughly discussed; and, it was the consensus of the Council this question be resolved by placing the matter on the ballot. The City Attorney was directed to prepare the appropriate resolutions calling the election and requesting consolidation with the November General Election for consideration at the next meeting to be held August 17, 1976. 14. From the Recreation Commission making recommendation on city-owned property at Otis Drive and Rosewood Way. Councilman Sherratt moved the report be accepted and the Commission be requested to prepare a priority list on sites for the Senior Center only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckam and carried unanimously on voice vote. 15. From City Auditor submitting reports of Count of Money held February 18 and May 12, 1976. Councilman Beckam moved the reports be accepted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried unanimously on voice vote. 16. From the City Manager concerning Joint Powers Agreement with ACAP. Councilman Sherratt moved the report be accepted and the resolution authorizing the agreement be considered out of order. The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried unanimously on voice vote. There being no objection, the meeting proceeded to "Resolutions". RESOLUTIONS: 17. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Sherratt who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8569 Authorizing Execution of Joint Powers Agreement Establishing a Community Action Agency in Alameda County." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None. The meeting returned to the regular order of business. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 18. From Assistant City Manager concerning Vision Care Service Agreement. Councilman Diament moved the report be accepted and the resolution authorizing the agreement be considered out of order. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckam, and carried unanimously on voice vote. There being no objection, the meeting proceeded to "Resolutions". RESOLUTIONS: 19. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8570 Authorizing Execution of Vision Care Service Agreement Between the City and California Vision Care Service." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five . Noes: None. Absent: None. The meeting returned to the regular order of business. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 20. Consideration of following items brought up under "New Business" at regular meeting held July 20, 1976: (a) Comments of President Corica regarding disposition or use of Post Office Building. City Manager Goss elaborated on his written report which reviewed the possible necessity of selling the Post Office to fund building the new Police Headwarters. He stated the City had an opportunity for funding under the new Public Works bill which would provide 100% financing if the project is approved, and the City should be hearing within a short time if its application had been approved. He recommended the City proceed with its application; and at the same time, proceed with a two-month advertising period and receive bids for the sale of the buildng. Councilman Sherratt moved the staff be directed to 1) continue with the application for funding under the Public Works Act for construction of the Police headquarters; and 2) begin the process of advertising, taking bids, and specify the Post Office building be retained and restored rather than demolished. Councilman Beckam seconded the notion; and questioned if two bids should be taken, one to preserve and one to sell outright. The City Manager responded that this was possible. After further discussion of a minimum bid of SI95,000^ inclusion of the right to rEect any and all bids and the process of a negotiated bid which would allow more flexibility in determining an conditions the Council might wish to include in the final agreement, the motion passe, unanimously on voice vote. (b) Submission by President Corica of request from American National Red Cross, Alameda Chapter, for donation of unclaimed properties held by Police Department to assist in raising money for the Disaster Fund. President Corica reported this item had been taken care of earlier under Written Communications. RESOLUTIONS: 21. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Beckam, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8571 Appointing Member of the Social Service Board." (Linda I. Pritchard) The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. The Oath of Office was administered by the Deputy City Clerk. 22. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Sherratt, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8572 Appointing Member of the City Planning Board." (Michael G. Gorman) The notion was seconded by Councilman Beckam and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. The Oath of Office was administered by the Deputy City Clerk. 23. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8573 Authorizing Execution of Contract with Ransome Company or Improvement Of Island Drive and Certifying Environmental Impact Report or Said Project." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following roll call YOtP, Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 24. Councilman Hurwitz introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8574 Declaring Copies of the Uniform PlU0bjnr Code, 1973 Edition, Placed On File with the City Clerk to be Public Records; Setting the Time and Place of Public Hearing on the Adoption of Said Code by Reference, and Directing Publication of Notice of Said Hearing." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 25. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Diament who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8575 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda Providing Rules and Regulations Relating to Employment of Ceratain Officers and Employees of the City of Alameda Covered by Salary and Position Resolution No, 8552.^ The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Cnuncilnon Hurwitz and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 26. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Sherratt, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 8576 Supporting HB 12608 and S8 3311 Relating to Reform of Federal Power Act." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. The President declared the foregjng Resolution adopted. ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE: 27. "Ordinance No. 1823, New Series Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Sections 2-312, 2-321 and 11-221 Thereof Relating to Appointment of Members of the Recreation Commission, Golf Commission and Design Review Board." Councilman Hurwitz moved the ordinance be passed as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckam. President Corica expressed his opinion the present system was adequate and any change unnecessary. Councilman Diament agreed. Joseph Sullivan, 3221 Liberty Avenue, stated he believed the Charter should not be amended and urged the Council to withdraw the Charter amendment measure acted upon earlier to allow appoint- ments to Board and Commissions to be made by the Council rather than the Mayor, and also not to adopt this ordinance. Linda Pritchard, 3263 San Jose Avenue, speaking as a recent appointee, expressed her feelings about the method appointments are now being made, and its adverse effect on the person being considered. After further discussion, the ordinance was passed on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Three. Noes: Councilman Diament and President Corica, (2). Absent: None. 28. "Ordinance No. 1824, New Series An Interim Ordinance Prohibiting and Suspending Issuance of Any Permit for Uses Inconsistent with Proposed Noise Element." Councilman Hurwitz moved the ordinance be introduced and passed as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament. Mr. Greg Silva, Attorney, representing Emily Silva, owner of property on Bay Farm Island adjacent to the Harbor Bay Isle project asked the ordinance not be adopted. He stated development of the property was in conflict with the proposed Noise Element and involved in the proposed Settlement Agreement among the City, the Port and Harbor Bay Isle. He informed the Council that, on August 6, he had served the City Attorney with a Notice of Motion for Order to intervene as a necessary and indispensible party to the Agreement. He stated Judge Young had agreed to hear his motion on August 17 and alleged adoption of this ordinance was aimed at defeating his motion and would expose the City to an action of inverse condemnation. He requested no action be taken pending the hearing before Judge Young. The City Attorney responded to the comments of Mr. Silva and discussed the effect of the proposed Noise Element on any proposed development. He stated the proposed ordinance, in his opinion, would have no effect on Mr. Silva's motion, and advised the Council this ordinance would be in effect only until the Noise Element is adopted. On a call for the question, the motion passed on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. BILLS: 29. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof, in the total amount of $80,772.79, was presented to the Council at this meeting. The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the claims shown were correct. Councilman Beckam moved the bills as itemized in the List of Calims filed with the City Clerk on August 6, 1976, and presented to the City Council at this meeting be allowed and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and on roll call vote carried by unanimous vote. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL: 30. Arthur Roke, 810 Paru Street, criticized actions of the Planning Board, and particularly in regard to the use permit granted to Xanthos House. He stated he represented 69 citizens in the neighborhood of Stephens Center who wanted the Council to be aware of their feelings on the subject. He also expressed opposition to the appeal filing fee of $50, and charged it was discriminatory. On question, Planning Director Patterson explained the purpose of the filing fee. The City Attorney explained that the Council could appeal the decision of the Board. He requested that Mr. Roke write a letter requesting the Council appeal the decision of the Board. When Mr. Roke objected, Mr. Stroud explained the procedure would protect the interests of Mr. Roke and any other parties involved. Mr. Roke stated he would submit a letter for the agenda of the meeting to be held August 17. FILING: 31. Agreement between City and Alameda Unified School District - re Lincoln School access roadway. 32. Agreement between City and Ransome Company - re improvement of Island Drive. 33. Uniform Plumbing Code, 1973 Edition, by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials - Alameda Plumbing Code. 34. Service Agreement Between City and California Vision Service. 35. Councilman Sherratt moved the Council retire to executive session for discussion of pending litigation. The motion was seconded by Councilmar Beckam and carried unanimously on voice vote. After a five-minute recess, the Council reconvened in the Conference Room for its deliberations. At the conclusion of discussion, it was determined no action would be taken at this time. ADJOURNMENT: 36. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned in respect to the memory of JAMES COWAN, retired General Manager of the Bureau of Electricity, to assemble in regular session on Tuesday, August 17, 1976, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. Respectfully submitted, Deputy City Clerk