1976-09-07 Regular CC Minutes��A-Th
L��'�
REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY - - - - - - - - SEPTEMBER 7, 1976,
The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Corica presiding. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Councilman Sherratt and was followed by a moment of silent prayer.
ROLL [ALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Beckam, Diament, Hurwitz, Sherratt and President Corica, (5),
Were noted present. Absent: None.
MINUTES:
1. Councilman Sherratt asked that the minutes of the Special Meeting held August 24, 1976, be
corrected at Item No. 3, paragraph 4, by adding the words, "under the City Chdrt8ro,
Councilman Hurwitz stated he would abstain from taking any action on the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 17, 1975, as he had not attended that meeting.
The minutes of the regular meeting held August 17, and the special meeting held August 24, 1970, as
corrected, were then approved.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
2. From Mr. and Mrs. Darrell T. Hickman, 459 Cola Ballena, requesting cablevision service be
made available to the residents of Alameda.
President Corica remarked this subject had come up before, at which tine it had been noted there
had been little demand for cablevision service by the residents, and no interest had been expressed
by suppliers. He stated that inasmuch as the city owned its transmission lines, at such time as
there was sufficient interest the city might wish to enter into this field. The communication was
referred to the file and the City Manager was requested to respond to Mr. and Mrs. Hickman with an
explanation of past action.
J. ` From the East Shore Home Owners' Association opposing extension of Fernside Boulevard.
The communication was referred to the Planning Board for consideration in the hearings on the
Combined Land Use, Circulation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan.
4. ' From Mr. Joseph M. Sullivan, 3221 Liberty Avenue, concerning the Fernside Boulevard extension.
This cOm0uriCatfUn was also referred to the Planning B0Ord,
Mr. Sullivan referred to the alternatives set out in his communication. He asked that the Council
recall from the Planning Board its previous direction of January 7, 1975, to delete reference to
Fernside Boulevard from the General Plan, or take steps to submit the question of the extension of
Fernside Boulevard to the voters at the next Municipal Election to be held in April, 1977. Mr.
Sullivan stated that should the Council be uOwil]irg to take either of these actions, it was his
opinion that interested citizens would initiate a petition to have the matter placed on the ballot.
He noted the members of the present City Council, who were holding office at the time of the directive
to the Planning Board, had gone on record as opposing the extension of Fernside Boulevard.
Councilman Sherratt said he felt Mr. Sullivan had misapprehensions about the full hearing process
on the Land Use and Circulation Element before the Planning Board; that he, personally, did not
feel the question should be placed on the bdl]Ot. He remarked that he was not a member of the Council
when the prior action had been taken, and was of the opinion the Planning Board should not consider
it in the hearing process. He said he was very interested in seeing what the professional opinions
were on the eAtn3i0n, pro and con, and to ?n through the hearing process.
However, he stated, should this be the fear expressed by the people, he would move that the Planning
Board be instructed to disregard the prior Council action of January 7, 1975, directing that it
delete references to Fernside Boulevard from the General Plan, and further that the Planning Board
conduct a full hearing process with no regard to the prior directive.
Councilman DiameOt seconded the motion. She said it was her concern the Planning Board might feel
prejudiced in its decision because of the 1975 directive.
Councilman Hurwitz recalled he was one of the majority favoring the deletion, however said it had
not been his original intent that the Planning Board delete reference to Fernside Boulevard from
the General Plan because the Council had said so, but that they consider the directive in the overall
hearing process. He said he felt he was open minded encugh to look at the Circulation Element and
if it should prove the extension would be best for the city, that would be the way he would vote.
He said he did not feel the matter was a proper subject to be placed on the ballot, butvould vote
to do so should this be the wish of the people.
On question, Planning Director Patterson said that, although he could not speak for the Planning
Board, he felt they would be most objective when considering the Circulation Element. He noted
there was wide community interest in the subject. Mr. Patterson explained the hearing and review
process on the Element and its Environmental Impact R2pOrt, He said his understanding of the 1975
Council motion was that they wished to be on record as opposina the extension of Fernside Boulevard
and referred that issue to the Planning Board for the public hearing process, which, in turn, would
be a general Plan Amendment.
����
'���^�
Mr. Charles Tillman concurred with Mr. Sullivan's request. He noted two of the present Council
members did not participate in the vote on the 1975 directive.
Mrs. Jean Stone, 1623 High Street, stated it washer opinion Alameda residents were under the
impression references to Fernside Boulevard had already been deleted from the General Plan, and
this was the cause of their concern. She was advised by Councilman Hurwitz that the original
directive had also asked for hearings and a study by the Planning Board on the matter.
Mr. Joseph Cervelli, 3300 Encinal Avenue, asked why it was necessary for the Council to change
its original directive to the Planning Board. He said he though Mr. Sullivan was jeopardizing the
due process of the hearings and prejudging the Planning Board and Council.
President Corica restated Councilman Sherratt's motion and noted it contained a request that the
'Manning Board look at the whole picture; that it was not the intent of the Council to circumvent
the Board.
Following discussion and on a [dl] for the question, the motion carried on the following roll
call vote: Ayes: Five. Noes: NODe, Absent: None.
5. From 8 residents, requesting an inVestfgationof adult bookstores and enterprises of like nature
in the community.
The Clerk stated petitions containing 97 additional signature had been received on the subject
this date.
President Corica reported the City Attorney had already been requested to prepare an ordinance
which would regulate these business establishments as to location, within the limits of the
recent Supreme Court decision.
City Attorney Stroud noted an interim ordinance was in effect, and he would prepare the requested
ordinance within the next month.
Councilman Hurwitz stated that inasmuch as there did not appear to be much the City could do about
abating or regulating the existing businesses as they were now operated, he would ask that the
City Attorney contact the Deputy District Attorney for possible action. Mr. Stroud said he would
comply with the request.
Mr. Don Tim Cooper, 401 Marion Court, submitted additional signed petitions and urged that some
type of action be taken as soon as possible.
6. From 8 residents concerning the licensing of Cats.
The communications were referred to the file pending receipt of the staff report which would be
on the agenda Of the regular meeting to be held September 21, 1976.
7, From Mrs. Elector Littlejoh, 1025 Buena Vista Avenue, submitting resignation as Tenant Member
Of the Alameda Housing Authority. (Two letters)
President Corica reported MrS. Little'0hn'S resignation would be accepted.
R. . From Mr. and Mrs. Hugh Darling, 1437-B Morton Street, complaining of noise pollution emanating
from the Naval Air Station.
Mr. Darling stated that at times the noise created by jet motors on the test rack in the night
hours had prevented them from Sleeping, and had caused the windows in their home to rattle. He
said, however, that since had had written to the Council this noise had diminished considerably.
President Corica noted Naval Air Station personnel had been contacted regarding the complaint and
had agreed to cooperate as much as possible.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
9. ` From the Mayor's Ad Hoc Advisory Estuary Study Committee submitting Final Report.
President Corica introduced Committee Chairman John Fenstermacher, ViceChairman Lawrence Stickney,
and Committee members Al Gillard and Maerose Evans. He commended the Committee [nits excellent
report and stated it was his wish the Committee should remain intact, not for the specific purpose
of meeting regularly but in order that they might function again at some future date. He noted the
Del Monte property was in the process of planning for improvements, and the developer had indicated
his willingness to cooperate with the city in its development.
Chairman Fenstermacher, 1734 Cambridge Drive, stated the Committee would like the record to reflect
its thanks to City Manager John Goss, City Attorney Carter Stroud, Planning Director Donald Patterson
and Deputy City Clerk Celia Conger for their invaluable a53istnee. He reviewed the program of the
Committee and stated there was a consensus on the Committee that they could provide some help to the
City and could possibly act as liaison between forces of development.
Councilman Diament commented on the Committee recommendation concerning the north shore parkway, and
asked if the Committee had discussed how this would be accomplished. Mr. Fenstermacher replied the
Committee had gotten into specifics but in wirting their Final Report, they felt there might be
some problem with coming in with a specific recommendation on a specific street or area, and had
therefore referred to geOeraltf25. He noted that Jack Shepard, General Manager and Chief Engineer of
the Bureau of Electricity, was a member of the Committee and his plans for generating energy had been
embodied in the report.
Mr. Fenstermacher answered questions put by members of the Council.
Councilman Sherratt moved acceptance of the report and requested it be made available to land owners
Of concern. The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried unanimously on voice vote.
10. From the Social Service Board, signed by the President, supporting the identification bracelet
program initiated by the Alameda Chapter of the American Red Cross.
Councilman Sherratt moved the report be accepted and the Council endorse the pr0grdm. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Beckam and on voice vote carried unanimously.
ll.` From the Social Service Board, signed by the President, regarding the proposed Senior Citizen
Center.
President Corica asked if there was interest on the part of the Council in knowing how many Senior
Citizen programs were in existence within the city at the present time. It was the consensus of the
Council that the City Manager be requested to provide such a report.
Mr. Charles Tillman noted this information was available through the Recreation Department.
Councilman Sherratt moved acceptance of the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz
and carried unanimously on voice vote.
I2.' From the Recreation Commission, Signed by the Secretary, concerning recommended bcations for
the new Senior Center.
President Corica reported the Commission had recommended locations in the following priority:
Rosewood Way and Otis Drive; the triangular property at PortolaAvenue and Westline Drive; and the
.78 acre site at Otis Drive and Willow Street. He thanked the Commission for its explanatory report.
Mr. L. A. Patton, I020 San Antonio Avenue, suggested consideration be given to locating the Senior
Center at either the old Masonic Temple or, predicated on negotiations now in progress with the
Alameda Unified School District, the main building of the Alameda High School.
Councilman Diament asked if, under the HCDA funding for the Senior Center, the city would be allowed
to locate it that far from the target area. Assistant City Manager Creagh explained it would be
most preferred to have the Center located in an area where there was a concentration of senior
citizens, and it might be a challenge to prove the eligibility for funding to HUD if it should be
taken out of the target area. City Manager Goss stated this issue could be addressed by showing
convenient transportation facilities.
Councilman Sherratt moved acceptance of the report, and that the matter of the site of the Senior
Center be placed on the agenda of the regular meeting Of September 21, 1376, for decision. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Diament and on voice vote carried unanimously.
13. From the Design Review Board, signed by the Chairman, concerning Design Review Board appointments.
President Corica reported the communication dealt with the qualifications for membership on the Board.
On request, the City Attorney said the report apparently recommended Mr. Robert Duncan Nicol be appointed
to succeed Mr, Robert Hanson as the registered architect member of the 8Odrd. He referred to his
memorandum of July 12, 19760DCerDing the change in membership qualifications for the Board, in which
he had also indicated the Council could make the above recommended appointment should they so desire.
President Corica stated he would like to see less restrictions as to qualifications for membership
to this Board, and would prefer that lay persons also be qualified for appointment, preferably average
home owners who would be more sympathetic to the general public.
Councilman Hurwitz stated it was his opinion the problems faced by the Board required professional
decisions.
Councilman Sherratt said he would hope the Board was sympathetic and impartfJl. He stated he thought
that because of the expertise of the Board members, they were most helpful to the home owner in
protecting his interests and in offering professional advice.
Councilman Beckam said he thought President Corica's point was valid concerning individual home
owners, but he believed the bulk of the business done by the Board was now with commercial enterprises.
He noted the Board would be moving into the area of developments very shortly and the professional
outlook of its members would be most needed.
Councilman Sherratt moved acceptance of the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz
and carried unanimously on voice vote.
14. From the City Manager transmitting report on the I976-1077 Budget and Tax Rate.
President Corica reported the City Manager had recommended the city property tax rate remain unchanged
for the coming fiscal year.
Councilman Hurwitz asked why no mention had been made of the impact of the increased Busliness License
Fees. Mr. Goss replied the direction of the Council was to place the bulk of the increase into the
Capital Improvement Program, and the first two years of revenue had been allocated to finance the
Police Building with a sMdller amount to the General Fund.
Councilman Hurwitz complimented the City Manager on the excellent job done in preparing the
budget. He said he had hoped to be able to reduce the property tax rate, but this was not possible.
Mr. Charles Tillman asked if the 1976-1977 budget would be printed for distribution. Mr. Goss
said this would be probably done about October or November. Councilman Hurwitz suggested the
document be multilithed rather than printed to save on the cost.
Councilman Hurwitz moved acceptance of the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Sherratt
and on voice vote carried unanimously.
There being no objection, the meeting proceeded to "Resolutbns".
RESOLUTIONS:
15. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Beckam, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 8582
Approving and Adopting a Budget for the Fiscal Year 1976-1977;
Appropriating Certain Moneys for the Expenditures Provided in Said
Budget for Said Fiscal Year and Ratifying Certain Expenditures Hereto-
fore Made."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried on the following
roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
16. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz, whc moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 8583
Fixing the Rate and Lefying a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in
the City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1976-1977 and Apportioning the
Same Among the Several Funds of the City."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following
roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
The meeting returned to the regular order of business.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
17. From the City Manager transmitting Final Environmental Impact Report on the Buena Vista Park
Neighborhood Building for certification.
Councilman Hurwitz asked if the presence of the Victorian cottages on Pacific Avenue would in any
way change the plans for the park. The Planning Director stated it was his understanding that in
the process of reviewing the EIR there was response from the State Historical Preservation Office
in which three issues were addressed; one was that the City agreed not to demolish the units,
however there were alternatives such as relocation; secondly, that the state be notified; and
thirdly, that the neighborhood recreation center would not have an adverse impact on the existing
Victorian cottages.
Councilman Sherratt moved the Council certify the EIR was prepared according to the California
Environmental Quality Act and had been considered. The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament
and carried unanimously on voice vote.
There being no objection, the meeting proceeded tc "Resolutions".
RESOLUTIONS:
18. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 8584
Certifying Environmental Impact Report Respecting Proposed Buena
Vista Park Neighborhood Building."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following
roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
The meeting returned to the regular order cf business.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
19. From the City Manager submitting recommendations of the Planning Board on Seismic Safety/
Safety and Noise Elements to the General Plan and Environmental Impact Reports.
The hearing date was set for September 21, 1976.
20. From the City Manager regarding the Public Works Employment Act of 1976.
198
It was the consensus of the City Council that the matter be referred to the City Manager and
City Attorney for report.
23. Consideration of appointments to the Design Review Board, continued from the meeting of
July 20, 1976.
President Corica suggested nominations be deferred pending the outcome of a Charter amendment
related to the subject, which would be voted on by the electorate on November 2, 1976.
Councilman Hurwitz said that since there seemed to be some question as to how the method of
nominations by the Council would work, he thought this would be a good opportunity to try it
out to see if it would create problems and it would give the voters an opportunity to make
their decision.
Councilman Sherratt said his concern was that Mr. Hanson had asked to be replaced on the Board
several months ago, and that it would be an imposition to ask that he continue to serve longer.
Councilman Hurwitz suggested each Council member write down his or her nominations and give
the list to the City Clerk, who could read the nominations according to the majority vote of
the Council.
President Corica dissented and stated it was his opinion all nominations should be made publicly.
Councilman Beckam moved nominations be opened for the position on the Design Review Board of
Architect or Landscape Architect. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried
unanimously on voice vote.
Councilman Beckam placed in nomination the name of Robert Duncan Nicol. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Diament and on voice vote carried unanimously.
Councilman Beckam moved nominations be opened for the position on the Design Review Board of a
State Licensed General Building Contractor. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and
carried unanimously on voice vote.
Councilman Beckam placed in nomination the name of Gerhard W. Degemann. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Hurwitz and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: Council-
man Diament, (1). Absent: None.
24. Councilman Sherratt inquired concerning the availability of the final drawings of the Police
Administration Building.
The City Manager reported the working drawings were essentially complete and should be available
within the next several weeks.
25. Councilman Beckam requested a report from the City Manager, for the meeting of September 21,
1976, concerning whether or not the terms of the lease with the Alameda Swimming Pool Association
were being adhered to.
26. President Corica inquired as to the status of the possible sale of the Post Office Building.
The City Manager stated staff had not yet prepared the prospectus for distribution, bt this should
be forthcoming in the near future.
NEW BUSINESS:
27. Councilman Diament commented on a remark made by theprofessional investigating the cause of
the South Shore Beach odor that one of the three types of algae found was a very valuable crop
and could be harvested. She inquired concerning the feasibility of such a project.
It was noted the subject would be placed on the agenda of the next meeting for discussion.
RESOLUTIONS:
28. , The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Hurwitz, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 8585
Approving the Application for Land and Water Conservation Funds for
Phase III of Washington Park Development Project."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following
roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: Councilman Diament, (1). Absent: None.
29. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Sherratt, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 8586
Authorizing Execution of Landscape Architectural Services Agreement with
Theodore Osmundson & Associates in Connection with Phase II Development
in Washington Park."
PS' T
197
On request, Mr. Goss summarized his written report. He noted the city had submitted six projects
to be included in the County's Overall Economic Development Plan prior to enactment of this legis-
lation, namely, (1) construction of the Police Administration Building; (2) construction of City
Line Road; (3) construction of subsequent phases of the Washington Park project; (4) construction
of facilities for expansion of the Main Library; (5) installation of a drainage system on Island
Drive; (6) construction of the Bay Farm Island Branch Library. He said it would appear from the
regulations that projects 3 through 6 would be ineligible because the city would not be in a
position to go to bid and award a contract within 90 days after approval of the application, however
this would be examined in more detail. The Police Administration Building project, he said, while
able to be bid within the specified time period, apparently was ineligible because funds are budgeted
and currently available for this project. He stated the only current project possibly available for
successful application would appear to be the City Line Road project, however there was no guarantee
federal funding would be obtained under this program. Mr. Goss requested authorization to submit
the programs previously discussed and, should other projects come to mind, he would like to have the
flexibility and option to submit projects which appeared to have some funding capability, with the
understanding these would be brought back to theCouncil for review and decision as to whether or
not they should be pursued.
Councilman Hurwitz suggested the following projects be reviewed for funding eligibility; beach
erosion, the north side pumping station or any of the north side flooding problems, the community
center, and the 2 acre park site at Fir and Melrose.
Councilman Sherratt suggested the completion of Washington and Lincoln Parks be considered also.
Councilman Hurwitz moved acceptance of the report and authorization be given to the City Manager
to prepare and submit project applications as he saw fit. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Sherratt and on voice vote carried unanimously.
21. From the City Manager regarding improvements to Washington Park, Area B.
Councilman Sherratt noted there had been some question as to the legality of the use of money for
this project from the Tidelands Trust Funds. He said he personally felt the city should continue
to pursue this particular project and complete it.
Councilman Hurwitz moved acceptance of the report and authorization be given for the transfer of
funds from the Tidelands Trust Fund to the General Fund for valid tideland grant expenditures
already made by the city. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckam.
Councilman Sherratt requested the City Attorney to prepare an opinion on the Tidelands Trust Fund
and its uses.
Mr. Charles Tillman expressed his agreement with Councilman Diament's position on this use of the
Tidelands Trust Fund. He suggested funding for the Washington Park project be sought from some
other source.
Mr. Laszlo Horvath, 1108 Marianas Lane, commented on the poor oondition of the South Shore Beach
and urged that something be done to restore it. President Corica reported steps were being taken
to rectify the situation.
On a call for the question, the motion carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four.
Noes: Councilman Diament, (1). Absent: None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
22. Consideration of following items brought up under "New Business" at regular meeting held
August 17, 1976.
(a) Comment by President Corica regarding Capital Improvement Program priority rating of Corpor-
ation Yard improvements.
On question, the City Manager stated the Corporation Yard project was the top priority in the
unfunded category. He was requested by President Corica to investigate all possible sources of
funding for this much needed project.
Mr. Charles Tillman recalled that when the new Business License Tax had been approved, the increase
in fees were designated to the Police Building project for the first two years and a high priority
had been given to the Golf Course improvements. He noted 3,976 business licenses had been issued
thus far during the current fiscal year bringing in $197,000, as compared to the same period the
preceding fiscal year of 4,016 licenses at $75,000. He estimated a total $213,000 would be
received this year from this source, compared to a total of $93,000 last year.
(b) Suggestion of Councilman Diament that the City Attorney provide legal assistance to the Housing
Authority.
Councilman Diament said she would agree with a suggestion made by the City Manager that the matter
be referred to him and the City Attorney to determine the interest of the Housing Authority, and,
if appropriate, to negotiate the details of a proposal to be submitted both to the Council and the
Housing Authority Board.
Attorney Daniel E. Cummins, 1134 Ballena Boulevard, acting legal counsel for the Housing Authority,
reported the Authority was finding itself in a position where it would require much more extensive
legal work and they were financially unable to hire private counsel. He noted there was pending
litigation which required attention and the cost was expensive. He said he would be perfectly happy
to continued working for the Housing Authority, however, it was his opinion the funds spent for
private legal counsel could be put to better use in providing houseing for the people who needed it.
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and carried on the following
roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Abstaining: Councilman Dfoment, (1). Absent: None.
The President declared the foregoing resolutions adopted.
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
30. Councilman Hurwitz introduced the following ordinance, after which it would he laid over under
provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
Amending Section 2-545 of the Alameda Municipal Code Relating to
Deferred Vacation Leave."
The motion was seconded by Councilman Sherratt and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes:
Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
31. Councilman Hurwitz introduced the following ordinance, after which it would be laid over under
provision of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section I0-2318
Thereof, Relating to Fees for Permits and Inspections (Electrical)."
The motion was seconded by Councilman Diament and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes:
FYYe, Noes: None. Absent: None.
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
32.' "Ordinance No. 1826,
New Series
Adopting by Reference the Uniform Plumbing Code, Copyright 1973 by
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials with
Amendments, Adoptions and Deletions Thereto as Primary Code Providing
for the Protection of the Public Health, Safety and Welfare by
Requiring a Permit for Inspection for the Installation, Maintenance,
Alterations and Repair of Plumbing and Drainage Systems, and Providing
for the Collection of fees Therefor; Providing for the Administration of
Said OrdinrCE; Defining Certain Terms; Providing for the Qualification
of Persons Engaged in the Business of Said Installations, Alterations,
Maintenance and Repair Thereto; and Prescribing Penalties for Violations
Thereof."
Councilman Beckam moved the ordinance be passed as 5Ubmitt2d. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Sherratt and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
33. "Ordinance No. 1827,
New Series
Amending Certain Portions of the Alameda Municipal Code Relating to
Traffic Regulations."
BILLS:
34. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof, in the
total amount of 3203,077.73, was presented to the Council at this meeting.
The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the claims shown were correct.
Councilman Beckam moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on
September 7, 1970` and presented to the City Council at this meeting be allowed and paid. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Hurwitz and on roll call vote carried unanimously.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL:
35. Mr, Joseph Sullivan discussed the lack of the printed budget for the prior year, complained of
the tax rate, commented on the use of the Tidelands Trust Fund, recommended an increase in the
Property Transfer Tax, and objected to the method used at this meeting to nominate members to the
Design Review Board rather than by nomination of the Mayor.
36. Mr. W. Lance Russum, 1234 Hawthorne, a member of the Recreation Commission, commented on the
lease with the Alameda Swimming Pool Association which had been effective since July 1, 1976. He
noted the City Manager was the person named by the Council to administer the lease on behalf of
the city; the summer program had expired and the Recreation Commission had received no information
OD the brochures which were to be distributed. He said it was his opinion the Council had not
carried through on their motion that the pools be opened to the public.
Concerning the tax rate, Mr. Russum said he would like to see the Council request from all of
the City Departments suggestions on how costs could be cut. He stated it was his belief the
city had never had an efficiency type of program whereby it might be able to cut some costs.
Pre5fdgt Corica asked the City Manager to send Mr. Russum a copy of the recent Comparative
Cost Analysis, and Mr. Goss explained the techniques used in preparation of the Annual Budget.
37. ' Mr. Edward Baker, I813 Lafayette Street, owner of a Victorian cottage at 1307 Pacific
Avenue, asked if the city would be interested in purchasing the property in the near future.
President Corica said it was his recollection it was the direction of the Council that the city
would be interested in buying the property when it was offered for sale, and had not set a time
schedule for acquiring this or other properties in the vicinity.
On request, Assistant City Manager Creagh reported the city now owned property at I317 Pacific
Avenue and had negotiated with the previous owner of the I307 Pacific Avenue home for its
purchase, however negotiations had broken off. He said he hadbeen contacted by a realtor
representing Mr. Baker about a year ago, and the realtor had indicated his client was interested
in discussing a sale, but nothing further had developed. Councilman Sherratt suggested Mr.
Creagh discuss the matter with Mr, Baker.
38. Mr. Charles Tillman asked when the previously proposed sewer charge would be put into
effect.
The City Manager advised a report would be submitted within the next several months on this
and related Sub'ectS.
FILING:
39. Final Budget - Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1977.
40. Financial and Operating Report of Bureau of Electricity for period ending June 30, 1976 -
Verified by George A. Hackleman.
41. Agreement between Theodore Osmundson & Associates and City - re Phase II Development in
Washington Park.
42. Councilman Sherratt moved the Council retire to executive session for a discussion of
litigation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Beckam and carried unanimously on voice vote.
After a five-minute recess, the Council reconvened in the Conference Room for its deliberations,
At the conclusion of discussion, it was determined no action would be taken at this time.
ADJOURNMENT:
43. There being no further business to come before this meeting, the Council adjourned at
10:30 o'clock p.0', to assemble in regular session on Tuesday, September 21, 1976, at 7'30
o'clock p.0.
Respectfully submitted,
City Clerk