Loading...
1965-01-04 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD TUESDAY EVENING JANUARY 4, 1966 The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Godfrey presiding. The Pledge of Alle- giance was led by Councilman McCall and was followed by an inspiring Invocation delivered by The Reverend Father William O'Donnell, Assistant Pastor of St. Joseph's Church. ROLL CALL: The roll was called and Councilmen La Croix, Jr., McCall, Rose and President Godfrey (4), were noted present. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). 1. The minutes of the regular meeting held December 21, 1965, were approved as transcribed. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 2. Mrs. Helen L. Freeman, 821 Laurel Street, referred to her request of several months ago for cer- tain documents. She stated she had received all of these items with the exception of a certain map made a part of the Fill Agreement with Shore Line Properties, Inc,, and she would like to have this also. Mrs. Freeman was assured that if she would call at the office of the City Clerk she would be able to procure the desired map. 3x/ The mutter was called up concerning the Appeal from the decision of the City Planning Board to grant a Use Permit to Messrs. Ted J. Meiers and F. Ratheeoy to operate a motor bike rental and service agency at 2449 Santa Clara Avenue. The Appeal was filed by Messrs. F. S. Collischonn, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Alameda First National Bank; Louis S. Selk, Manager of the Alameda Business Office of East Bay Municipal Utility District; and Webb Goodman of Everett Street Service Station. Upon request, Mr. Donald F. Johnson, Planning Director, verbally reviewed the details of this case, as set forth in his memorandum to the City Manager, dated December 31, 1965, copies of which had been sent to the Councilmen for their information. Further, Mr, Cunningham, City Attorney, stated the legal issue before the Council was whether or not the action of the Planning Board under 3ec, 11-162(a) of the Alameda Municipal Code should be affirmed, modified or reversed. He also read the provisions of the Code in 3ec, 11-161(e) which described the action which must be taken by the Board in connection with Use Byzmits, The President then called for the proponents in this matter - those in favor of the issuance of the Use Permit. Mr. Meiers appeared and stated he would rather hear the opponents speak first and then have the opportunity for rebuttal. President Godfrey therefore inquired if there were any opponents to the question who desired to apeak. Two of the appellants, Messrs. Collischonn and Selk, addressed the Council. They emphasized the hazard to pedestrians at the intersection of Santa Clara Avenue and Everett Street and the noise nuisance which would be caused by the conduct of said business at this location` as the principal factors in their protest against this enterprise on this site. They urged the Council to reverse the decision of the Board and deny the granting of a Use Permit. Mr. Meiers, 3615 Brunel Drive, Oakland, then submitted his arguments to refute the contentions of the appellants. He claimed the 'bikes" were not as noisy as they had been alleged to be and he also pointed up the fact that most of the business would be conducted during the weekend period when the bank, in particular, would be closed. Mr. Meiers stated, too, that he and his partner had searched throughout the City for a location in the proper zone where they could operate such a business - but to no avail. The President then declared the Hearing closed and the Council entered into a discussion of the situa- tion. Following a question and answer period between the Council and Mr. Meiers for clarification of certain aspects of the case, it was developed that the majority of the Council believed this locale was not suitable for such an undertaking. It was felt there would be hazards created by the handling of these bikes in this area. Councilman McCall then moved the Council reverse the decision of the Planning Board and grant the Appeal to deny the issuance of a Use Permit for the purpose requested. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Coun- cilmen McCall, Rose and President Godfrey` (3). Noes: Councilman La Croix, (1). Absent: Council- man Bartley, (1). REPORTS OF OFFICERS B0ADDS, ETCETERA: 4. ' From the City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Installing a Storm Sewer in Eagle Avenue from Lafayette Street to Minturn Street and in Minturn Street from Eagle Avenue to Clement Avenue - recommending it be accepted and the Notice of Completion be ordered filed. Councilman Rose moved the recommendation be approved; that the work on the specified project be accepted and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by Councilman La Croix and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). 5." "/ From the City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Recon- structing Lincoln Avenue from Court Street to High Street - recommending it be accepted and the Notice of Completion be ordered filed. Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be adopted; that the work on the designated project be accepted and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES: 6. Councilman La Croix introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro- vision of law and the Charter: "Ordinance No. New Series An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Subdivisions (34), (35) and (36) to Section 17-442 Thereof, Relating to Electrically Operated Traffic Control Signals." (Lincoln and Willow, High and Encinal, High and Fernside) Councilman McCall inquired if any consideration had been given to the installation of such signals { at the intersection of High Street and Otis Drive, which was getting to be a very dangerous corner, City Engineer Hanna replied that this intersection was in line for signals. The Department was aware of the condition at this intersection and signals would be put in soon. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 7v/ Councilman Rose referred to the report from City Engineer Hanna dated December 23, 1965, and the supplemental report with attached drawing, .dated December 29, 1905 _ concerning the Southern Crossing Bridge problem. Be inquired if the feasibility study report would be submitted to the State Legislature or to the State Toll Bridge Aut6ority, Mr. Hanna answered that he understood said report had to be presented to the Legislature by February 1, 1966. Councilman Rose also asked if the recommendation of the Engineers of the Bay Toll Crossings to the Legislature would be subject to a Public Hearing at which time the City of Alameda would be given an opportunity to object, if it so desired. Mr. Hanna answered that he believed the City would be given ample opportunity to express itself. Councilman Rose commented that he knew the City Manager and the City Engineer were alert to this situation, but he wanted to be sure the City of Alameda would be apprised of all developments in this matter and thus be able to make its position known. Upon request of Councilman McCall, the drawing was displayed and Mr. Hanna explained the proposed routes of the contemplated "Northern Corridnr" of the Southern Crossing for the information of all in the audience. It was also developed that it was the City Engineer's understanding that the additional tube or tubes under the Estuary off the foot of Main Street would be constructed concurrently with the proposed bridge. Councilman McCall expressed his opinion that this plan was the best to have been shown so far. NEW BUSINESS: '/. O.~ Councilman Rose remarked that it might be premature to mention it at this time, but he felt the Council was going to have to face the fact sooner or later that the City would need additional revenues for its budget. He said he wanted to suggest two items for future consideration in this respect: (1) a cigarette tax - which was under consideration in the City of Oakland and other cities - and (2) the hotel room tax. He stated he would not favor the cigarette tax in Alameda unless all adjacent cities also established this type of tax. President Godfrey pointed out that, as Chairman of the Mayors' Conference of Alameda County, he had appointed a Committee to check into the cigarette tax because it had been emphasized how detrimental it could be to one city to have said tax if a sister-city did not. 9. At this point, President Godfrey announced that Mrs. Frances Dauth, Times-Star Reporter, was leaving to affiliate with a newspaper in Concord, Contra Costa County. He said he, personally, thought she had done an excellent job and had been a very responsible citizen and he extended con- gratulations and best wishes for her success in the new post. Hearty applause indicated agreement with the President's remarks. RESOLUTIONS: 10. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6893 Ordering Vacation of Unused Portion of Public Purpose Easement (Sanitary Sewer - 1027 Post Street)." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). 479 11. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6894 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Building Repairs at the Alameda Swim Center, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). 12. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6895 Amending Salary and Position Resolution No. 6821 by Creating One (1) Position of Senior Stenographer-Clerk in the City Manager Department." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). 13. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption: v "Resolution No. 6896 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda In Memoriam to George J. Krueckel, Retired City Employee "WITH PROFOUND SORROW, the Council of the City of Alameda records the death of one of its loyal, former employees, GEORGE J. KRUECKEL. "WHEREAS, Mr. Krueckel had been employed as a Custodian for the City of Alameda on November 26, 1937, and had performed his duties conscientiously and most efficiently until his retirement on September 30, 1948; and "WHEREAS, Mr. Krueckel, in earlier life, had gained considerable renown for his ability to drive an automobile prior to the turn of the century and also for his capabilities as an automobile mechanic; and "WHEREAS, Mr. Krueckel had always been a most friendly and obliging person and had been well liked by all of his fellow employees and the many other people of the community with whbm he came in contact. "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Alameda does hereby express its appreciation for the fourteen years of reliable and excellent service given by Mr. Krueckel and for his cheerful nature which engendered pleasant relations and good will among all those he served. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread in full upon the minutes of this meeting and that a copy thereof be sent to the family of Mr. Krueckel to convey to its members a sincere expression of condolence in their bereavement. "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when this meeting of the Council of the City of Alameda adjourns, it shall do so in respect to the memory of this warmhearted man, GEORGE J. KRUECKEL." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). ~, 14. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6897 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda In Memoriam to Marie Maytorena, Retired City Employee "WITH HEARTFELT GRIEF, the Council of the City of Alameda records the death of one of its faithful, former employees, Miss MARIE (RENEE) MAYTORENA, who had begun her City employ- ment on February 1, 1917, and who had retired on May 9, 1953. "WHEREAS, Miss Maytorena had served as a Playground Director during her thirty-six years in the Recreation and Park Department and had been particularly outstanding in this capacity because of her musical and dramatic talents and her initiative in creating special programs - in addition to the regular recreation and sports activities; and "WHEREAS Miss Maytorena had been greatly admired for her cultural ability and loved for her patience with and understanding of the youngsters under her supervision. "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Alameda does hereby express its sincere gratitude for the invaluable services rendered by this fine woman on behalf of the youth of the community, which had earned the respect of all parents. "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread in full upon the minutes of this meeting and that a copy thereof be forwarded to the family of Miss Maytorena in order to extend to its members a sincere expression of sympathy in their bereavement. "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when this meeting of the Council of the City of Alameda adjourns, it shall do so in respect to the memory of this very devoted woman, MARIE MAYTORENA." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). The President declared all of the foregoing resolutions adopted. FILING: 15. Financial Statement - Bureau of Electricity, as of November 30, 1065 - Verified by Racklamao, Larzelere & McKenna. 10, Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 1-66-2 - Repairs to Alameda Swim Center Building. BILLS: 17. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof, in the total amount of $35,855.69, was presented to the Council at this meeting. The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct. Councilman McCall moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on January 4, 1966, and presented to the Council at this meeting, be allowed and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: None. Absent: Councilman Bartley, (1). ADJOURNMENT: 18. The President called up the audience to stand for a moment of silence in observance of the passing of the two former City Employees. There being no further business to come before the meet- ing, the Council adjourned in respect to the memory of MARIE MAYTORENA and GEORGE J. KRUECKEL - to assemble in regular session on Tuesday evening, January 18, 1966, at 7:30 o'clock. Respectfully submitted, 1