1965-09-07 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD TUESDAY EVENING SEPTEMBER 7, 1965
The meeting convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Godfrey presiding. The Pledge of Alle-
giance was led by Councilman Rose and was followed by an inspiring Invocation delivered by The
Reverend Mr. Martell Twitchell, Pastor, Santa Clara Avenue Methodist Church.
ROLL CALL:
The roll was called and Councilmen Bartley, La Croix, Jr., McCall, Rose and President Godfrey,
(5), were noted present. Absent: None.
1. The minutes of the regular meeting held August 17, and the special meeting held August 24, 1965,
were approved as transcribed.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
2. From Aeolian Yacht Club, signed by Mr. Leonard O. Long, Secretary, in complaint about the channel
as being dredged by Shore Line Properties, Inc., in connection with its Bay Farm Island Development -
and requesting information concerning said channel's completion.
The Clerk was to acknowledge said letter, informing the "Club" that the City had an agreement with
this Developer and the channel would indeed be dredged in complete accordance with its provisions.
Further, if there was some specific or technical information which said Club would like to have, it
was to be advised to contact the City Engineer or the City Manager.
Councilman McCall explained other aspects of this situation relating to the channel and it was developed
that, eventually, San Leandro Bay would probably be drddgod for a deep-water channel.
3. From Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth E. Van Cleve, 421 Sand Beach Road, in protest against the permanent
"No Left Turn" signs on Shore Line Drive.
Upon request, City Engineer Hanna reviewed the background of this matter and explained why it was
believed advisable to install said signs and prohibit left turns at all timeo. Be. pointed out the
neighborhood had been canvassed and all those living in the area at that time supported this proposed
action.
The President asked the City Clerk to acknowledge the letter, indicating that Mr. Hanna would fully
inform them of the situation.
4Y
From Mro, Jeannette L. David, 470 Buena Vista Avenue, with regard to Alameda Public Schools,
claiming she could not get "answers" to her questions from the School District Administration or the
Board of Education.
The President stated he had attempted to check into this mutter and then reviewed the situation as it
had apparently devaloped. Be felt the Clerk should acknowledge the letter, indicating that if there
were any specific items of information desired by Mrs. David, she should ask the Board directly. He
stated he did not believe the Council should involve itself in this matter at the present time.
Upon the suggestion of Councilman Bartley, the President also instructed the Clerk to send a copy of
Mrs. David's letter to the Board of Education and indicate that it should check into the Real Estate
salesman's "ad" placements.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
5^ At this point, President Godfrey noted and welcomed Mr. S. Chesley Anderson, former Mayor of the
City of Alameda. His presence was acknowledged with hearty applause from the audience,
6/ b. Sr, Frank A. Gottstein, 731 Haight Avenue, referred to recent comments that action should be
taken to procure more industry in the City. He expressed his belief that the City of Alameda had
never been able to support industry.
7/
Mr. Bruce Bernhard, 720 Paru Street, addressed the Council substantially as follows: "I am one
of the owners of Harbor Land Company and this oral communication refers to item No. 3 under 'Hearings'.
Our application for rezoning of a commercial area on Central Avenue appears to have created some cou-
troveroy in the neig6bor600d, ge have always strived to get along with our neighbors in the commuoity.
We feel that the development is an important part of the City and the City's future grontb. We have
always received the cooperation and support of City Officials and the citizens and want this to
continue. In the interest of the community and to obliterate any possible dissension - until all
problems can be solved - we withdraw our rezoning application at this time. Of course, our eogioeer-
ing, architectural, traffic and other studies will continue and we will return to you at a later time
when we hope to have your full support.“
President Godfrey stated it was true that the City and this Company had had a very friendly, workable
program and he expressed his appreciation to Mr. Bernhard for withdrawing his application at this
time. He said it was realized that there were some engineering and traffic problems to be resolved
and he expressed the sincere hope, on behalf of the City Council, that in the very near future the
Developers could submit a plan which would be acceptable to all concerned.
435
The Council concurred with these statements.
HEARINGS:
8. The matter was called up with regard to the Appeal from the decision of the Planning Board to
deny a variance to allow a certain side yard encroachment on the property of Reuben G. and Vera D.
Madsen, 1851 Nason Street.
The Clerk stated Mr. and Mrs. Madsen had been notified that the Hearing on their Appeal would be held
at this meeting. Also, copies of the minutes of the Planning Board meeting at which this case was
considered had been sent to the Councilmen for their iofozmatioo.
Upon request, Mr. Donald Johnson, Planning Director, distributed to the Councilmen a sketch of the
property in question and reviewed the matter in detail.
City Attorney Cunningham then stated the legal issue before the Council was whether or not the action
of the Planning Board, under Sec. 11-181 (b) and (e) of the Alameda Municipal Code should be affirmed,
modified or reversed.
The President called for the proponents and Mr. and Mrs. Madsen presented their reasons for desiring
the nariance. It was explained that they wanted to build a garage and storage building to be attached
to the side of their dwelling to bring the garage facilities closer to the front of their lot. The
existing large building at the rear of the property was subsequently to be razed.
It was developed that an alternate plan had been proposed which could resolve the problem without requir-
ing an encroachment into the side yard area. Also, the Planning Board had found no hardship involved
which would necessitate the variance.
Upon the call'for opponents to the question, there was no response. The President then declared the
Hearing closed.
Following discussion of the situation, Councilman La Croix moved the decision of the Planning Board
be upheld and the Appeal be denied. The motion was seconded by Councilman Bartley and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None.
9. The matter next called up for Hearing was the proposed adoption of Volume I and Volume III, 1964
Editions, Uniform Building Code, as Primary and Secondary Codes, respectively - with the changes,
additions and deletions therein indicated.
The Clerk stated there was on file the Affidavit of fuJblicatioo of the Notice of Hearing in this case
which had been published twice in accordance with the requirements of the law in this mattor.
Upon request, Mr. James R. Drummer, Chief of the Inspections Division, reviewed the history of the
development of Uniform Building Codes and the practice of the City in adopting said Codes. He pointed
out that said Code provided for the establishment of a Board of Appeals - but explained that there had
been "no buaineay" for such a Board in the City of Alameda during the past many years.
Mr. Cunningham stated the legal issue was whether the City should enact a proposed ordinance which
would adopt by reference, and under State law, Volumes I and III, 1964 Edition of the Uniform Building
Code, as amended by the proposed ordinance, and to designate it as the Alameda Building Code. The pro-
posed ordinance would replace the 1961 Edition of the Uniform Building Code with this 1964 Edition.
There being no further questions, the matter was referred to "Ordinances for Passage".
(Originally scheduled for a Public Hearing at this time was the request from Harbor Land Development
Company for the reclassification of a portion of its property in the vicinity of Fourth Street and
Central Avenue.
In conjunction therewith, a letter had been received from Burnhill, Rode, Moffitt & Moore, Attorneys,
representing Messrs. Bruce Bernhard and Martin Bramante, dba Harbor Land Development Company, requesting
that this Hearing be continued to either October 5 or 19, 1965, whichever the Council preferred.
As already indicated, the matter had been withdrawn by Mr. Bruce Bernhard.)
REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS ETCETERA:
lO^~ From City Manager, concerning the Street Department Brush-Chipper, and recommending the Council
find that certain equipment for this machine could be purchased in the open market at a lower price`
and that it authorize said purchase at a cost of $1,865., without fdiu`al contract - under provision of
Section 3-15 of the City Charter.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be adopted; that authorization be granted for the purchase
of the necessary part accordingly at the price quoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and
carried on the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
ll: From City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Installing a Sani-
tary Sewer Main Along the North Shore of the Lagoon, from Grand Street to Bay Street - recommending it
be accepted and the Notice of Completion be ordered filed.
12,y From City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Resurfacing Vari-
ous Secondary Streets - recommending it be accepted and the Notice of Completion be ordered filed.
Councilman La Croix moved the two foregoing recommendations be approved; that the work on the desig-
nated projects be accepted and the Notices of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by Coun-
cilman Rose and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None.
13. `/ From City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Manuel C. Jardim, lowest and best bidder,
for the project of Installing a Storm Sewer in Eagle Avenue and in Minturn Street at the total cost
of $30,012.75,
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be adopted; that contract be awarded to the designated
bidder for the specified project at the price guoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and
on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
1411. From City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to Gallagher & Burk, Inc., lowest and best
bidder, for the project of Reconstructing Lincoln Avenue from Court Street to High Street at the
total cost of $9,815.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be followed; that contract be awarded to the firm indi-
cated for the specified project at the price gunted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and
carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None.
15Y From City Manager, with regard to the replacement of the floor covering in the restaurant, locker
room entrance and the pro shop at the Golf Course Clubhouse - requesting the Council's authorization,
under provision of Section 3-15 of the City Charter, to purchase said item in the open market.
It was pointed out the cost of this item would be approximately $4,650.
Councilman La Croix moved the request be granted and the City Manager be authorized to purchase the
necessary floor covering in the open market, under provision of Section 3-15 of the City Charter.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five.
Noes: None. Absent: None.
16. From City Manager, reporting all work satisfactorily completed on the project of Constructing a
Left Turn Slot at Tilden Way and Broadway - recommending it be accepted and the Notice of Completion
be ordered filed.
Councilman La Croix moved the recommendation be approved; that the work on said project be accepted
and the Notice of Completion be filed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
V
17. From City Planning Board, signed by the Secretary, recommending the Tentative Map of Tract 0o,
2797, Vista Del Mar, filed by Jones-Thenn & Associates for Doric Condominium Associated, be approved,
subject to the terms and conditions contained in the City Engineer's Report of August 27, 1965.
Councilman Rose moved the recommendation be adopted; that said Tentative Map of Tract No. 2797 be
approved as specifically set forth. The motion was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call
carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None.
�
l8� From City Planning Board, signed by the Secretary, recommending Property Division Map No. 153,
filed by Jones-Thenn & Associates for S. J. Dowling & Son, Inc., be approved subject to the terms and
conditions contained in the City Engineer's Report dated August 26, 1965.
The matter was referred to "Resolutions".
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
19, Councilman Bartley introduced the fulloWiug ordinance, after which it was laid over under provi-
sion of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Section 17-333 of the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Thereto Subdivisions (48) and (49), Relating to All Time No Parking." (Both
sides of Park Street, north of Blanding Avenue)
20. Councilman La Croix introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under provi-
sion of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Establishing Restricted Parking Area in Vicinity of Park Street
Bridge for Use by County and City Maintenance Vehicles." (Northerly of
Blanding Avenue)
At this point, the regular order of business was revised and the meeting proceeded under "Ordinances
for Passage".
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
21.
"Ordinance No.
New Series
An Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain Property Within the City of
Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, New Series." (As recommended
by the City Planning Board)
.__
There was some further discussion of the subject and, upon request, the City Attorney set forth the
proper procedure to effect the Council's intention to exclude the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue
and Sherman Street (1600,8herman Street) from said rezoning action, as originally designated on the
map entitled, "North-Central Alameda Rezoning Study - Exhibit `A' - Proposed Zoning Changes - June,
1965'', and initiated by the Board's Own Motion.
To bring the matter to a vote, Councilman McCall then moved the passage of the foregoing ordinauce.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and lost on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Councilman
Rose, (1). Noes: Councilmen Bartley, La Croix, Jr., McCall and President Godfrey, (4). Absent: None.
The order of business was then referred back to "Introduction of Ordinances" and the meeting proceeded
therefrom.
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES:
22. Councilman McCall introduced the following ordinunca, after which it was laid over under provi-
sion of law and the Charter:
"Ordinance No.
■■••••■••■•■••••■■••■••
New Series
An Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain Property Within the City of
Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, New Series./` (Excepting 1600
Sherman Street - Northeast Corner Lincoln Avenue and Sherman Street)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
v'
23. The matter was presented with regard to the City Ebployean, Health Insurance and Hospitalization
Plun, Mr, Richard D. Watson, Assistant City Manager, had prepared and submitted to the Councilmen a
memorandum, dated September 3, 1905, setting forth details of the two plans offered by Blue Cross and
Aetna Insurance Company, respectively.
Mr. Watson stated Mr. Forrest V. Routt, Jr,, Personnel Director, was preeaot. Also, the following
representatives: Mr. Zimmerman of Kaiser Foundation, Mr. Howard Mills of Aetna Insurance Company,
and Mr. Robert Traynor of Blue Cross - all of whom were available to answer any questions.
A very lengthy question and answer period was had in order to clarify many points and show comparisons
of the benefits and costs of said proposed health plans.
The .opinion was expressed that the Council's instructions had not been fully carried out with regard
to polling all of the City Employees to ascertain their desires in the matter or if they would be will-
ing to pay a slightly higher premium to include the retired employees.
City Manager Weller spoke in explanation of several aspects of the health plan - particularly with
regard to the retired employees. He pointed up the question of the Federal Medicare Program and its
eventual application. Mr. Weller strongly recommended that said retirees not be included in the City
Health Insurance Plan for its active employees. It was developed that these retirees already had
available a "continuation" health plan which would take care of them in this respect pending the
implementation of "Medicare".
It was agreed the employees were being penalized by the lag in this program due to the problems which
had been encountered and it was suggested that, to avoid further delay, action be taken at this meeting
to establish the dual health plan on an interim basis in order to carry out the Council's promise to
pay $8. per month toward each employee's insurance premium. This would be with the understanding that
said health insurance program be thoroughly reviewed within a year, with new specifications to be drawn
up at that time and a poll to be taken of the City Employees to definitely ascertain their desires.
Councilman Rose then moved that, through the City Manager, the Personnel Director be instructed to pro-
ceed with acquiring and submitting to the City Employees the two health plans for their choice - Blue
Cross or Kaiser Foundation - setting forth the full benefits to be derived from each plan - to be
effective at the very earliest date which could be arrived at - and the City to pay a monthly cost of
not in excess of $8. per employee. The motion was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call car-
ried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
Following some further comments, Councilman Rose also moved that one year hence, the entire matter of
health insurance be completely reviewed and, assuming the provisions of Medicare would then be known,
the status of the insurance for retired City Employees be further considered. The motion was seconded
by Councilman McCall and carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent:
None.
24. - The matter was then called up concerning the proposed conversion of the intersection at Central
Avenue, Encinal Avenue and Sherman Street to the equivalent of a standard intersection.
City Engineer Hanna had prepared and transmitted to the Councilmen a complete report, dated August 30,
1965, accompanied by maps, reviewing the "through-traffic" phase of the over-all traffic problem in the
City, as had been Studied by the traffic engineering consulting firm of Wilbur Smith and Associates
and presented in its report, "Alameda Traffic Plan 1961". Mr. Hanna also verbally explained the cir-
cumstances in question, and pointed up that a substantial amount of the recommendations in the 1961
Report had been accomplished. Be explained the purpose of establishing certain main routes and felt
the City should consider this particular intersection as merely a part of a larger policy and determine
if it should continue toward the development of Encinal Avenue as the basic route - or whether traffic
should be allowed to take the South Shore route.
A very lengthy discussion ensued - with some disapproval being expressed of the proposed change at
this locale. Subsequently, Councilman La Croix moved the City Engineer prepare a cost evaluation to
establish a temporary system as proposed for an adequate trial at the gore of Central, Sherman and
Encinal, and said report be submitted to the Council at its next meetiug. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None.
Absent: None.
25.17 Councilman McCall reported on the Capital Outlay Program. He referred to the memorandum from
the City Manager and the Assistant City Manager of January 19, 1985, and pointed up that the items
considered at this time were under the category of "Immediate" and "Near Futuze,' needs. He felt all
of these projects were urgent and action should be taken to implement them.
In response to inquiry, 8r. Hanna replied that the estimates shown in the memorandum covering these
several projects were not firm. Be reviewed the various projects.
After some further discussion, Councilman Rose moved that the City Engineer be directed to proceed
with preparation of plans and specifications and firm estimates of cost for the following projects:
(1) Fifth Street-Central Avenue Sewer; (2) East Encinal Avenue Storm Drainage Pump; (3) Sanitary
Sewer Replacements and (4) Separation of Storm Sewers from Sanitary Sewers. The motion was
seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes:
None. Absent: None.
NEW BUSINESS:
26, Councilman McCall spoke of the recent newspaper editorial urging the City to endeavor to, procure
more industry. He suggested this matter should be referred to the Alameda Chamber of Commerce for
submission to its Industrial Affairs Committee. He felt some action should be taken by the Chamber
in this respect.
27. Councilman McCall also emphasized that the "loose-dog" situation in the City was completely out
of hand and causing great trouble. Be strongly felt the leash law should be enforced.
There was a great deal of discussion of this issue. Mr. Weller stated he would check into the circum-
stances and ascertain what could be done to remedy the nuisance.
RESOLUTIONS:
28. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6840
Approving Agreement with the State of California for Maintenance of State
Highway Route 61 and Authorizing Execution Thereof."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
29. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6841
Requesting County of Alameda to Provide City with Communication Facilities
for Use of Automated Statewide Auto Theft Inquiry System."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayts: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
30. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6842
Amending Salary and Position Resolution No. 6821 by Creating One Additional
Position of Sergeant, and Deleting the Classification of Inspector, in the
Police Department."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
31. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6843
Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Reconstruction of
a Portion of Fernside Boulevard Between Harvard Drive and Cornell Drive,
Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
32. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
�����/ � x���
"Resolution No. 6844
Authorizing Execution of Agreement for Construction and Completion of
Improvements in Connection with Property Division Map No. 153 and Approving
Deposit of Certified Check as to Sufficiency in Lieu of Surety Performance
Bond (SE Corner Otis Drive and Willow Street -- S. J. Dowling & Son, Inc,)"
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
33. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6845
Approving Property Division Map No. 153 and Permitting Recording Thereof..
(SE Corner Otis Drive and Willow Street -- S. J. Dowling & Son, Inc.)"
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
34. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6846
Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Carpentry Work in
Godfrey Park, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
35. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resolution No. 6847
Approving and Adopting a Budget for the Fiscal Year 1965-1966; Appropriating
Certain Moneys for the Expenditures Provided in Said Budget for Said Fiscal
Year and Ratifying Certain Expenditures Heretofore Made."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None.
36. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption:
"Resiblution No. 6848
Fixing the Rate and Levying a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the
City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1965-1966 and Apportioning the Same
Among the Several Funds of tbe'City."
The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the
following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: Nooe,
The President then declared all of the foregoing resolutions adopted.
ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE:
37. "Ordinance No. 1510,
New Series
An Ordinance Adopting by Reference the Uniform Building Code, Volume Z,
1904 Edition, Copyright 1984 by International Conference of Building
Officials, with Amendments, Additions and Deletions Thereof, as the
Primary Code, and Volume III of Said Uniform Building Code, Referred to
in Said Primary Code as the Secondary Code; Regulating the Erection,
Construction, Enlargement, Alteration, Repair, Moving, Removal, Conversion,
Demolition, Occupancy, Equipment, Use, Height, Area, and Maintenance of
Buildings or Structures in the City of Alameda; Providing for the Issuance
of Permits and Collection of Fees Therefor; Declaring and Establishing a
Fire District, Providing Penalties for Violation Thereof, and Repealing
Ordinance 0ns, 1408, 1437, 1495, New Series, and All Other Ordinances and
Portions of Ordinances, in Conflict Herewith."'
Councilman La Croix moved the ordinance be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Council-
man McCall and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None, Absent: None.
Councilman McCall complimented the men in the Inspections Division of the Public Works Department for
the tremendous job they were doing. President Godfrey also expressed commendation for the several
City Inspectors.
38. "Ordinance No. 1511,
New Series
An Ordinance Amending Section 17-241 of the Alameda Municipal Code Relating
to Left Turns by Motor Vehicles at Certain Street Intersections."
Councilman La Croix moved the ordinance be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Council-
man Bartley and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent:
None.
39. "Ordinance No. 1512,
New Series
Councilman Bartley moved the ordinance be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Council-
.
man Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. Absent: None.
FILING:
40. Agreement for Maintenance of State Highway in Alameda - Between State De partment of Public
Works, Division of Highways and City.
41, Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 9-65-25 - Reconstruction of a Portion of
Fernside Boulevard between Harvard Drive and Cornell Drive.
42, Specifications, Spacial Provisions and Plans No. PW 9-65-26 - Carpentry Work at Godfrey Park,
BILLS:
43. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Doportmenta thereof, in the total
amount of $67,670.23, was presented to the Council at this meeting.
The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct.
Councilman McCall moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on
September 7, 1965, and presented to the Council at this meeting, be allowed and paid. The motion was
seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes:
An Ordinance Amending Sections 17-432 and 17-461 of the Alameda Municipal
Code Relating to Stop and Yield Intersections.'
44, There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned - to assemble
in regular session on Tuesday evening, September 21, 1965, at 7:30 o'clock.
Respectfully submitted,