Loading...
1963-06-18 Regular CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALAMED4 HELD TUESDAY EVENING, JUNE 18, 1962 The meeting was convened at 7:30 o'clock p.m. with President Godfrey presiding. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman La Croix and an inspiring Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Hr. Wilfred 8. Hodgkin, Rector, Christ Episcopal Church. ROLL CALL: The roll was called and Councilmen Freeman, La Croix, Jr., McCall, Rose and President Godfrey, (5), were noted present. Absent: None. MINUTES: 1. The minutes of the regular meetin 1903, were approved as transcribed. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: � June 4, and the adjourned regular meeting held June 11, 2. * From Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Board of Directors, signed by Mc, Robert M. Copeland, President, thanking the City Council for its support of the District's opposition to Assembly Bill 889, prohibiting charter bus service. The communization was noted and ordered filed. / From Mrs. Grace E. Birch, 2045 Central Avenue, suggesting efforts be made to have bus service from Alameda to Metropolitan Oakland International Airport and also, that benches be installed .on the east side of Webster Street at Lincoln Avenue for bus passengers. The President asked the Clerk to acknowledge the letter and also to transmit a copy thereof to the Transit District for its consideration of these requests. 4. From Alameda Realty, signed by Mr. Lowell H. Duggan, Agent for Owner, requesting an extension of time to December 20, 1963, for the purpose of filing the Final Map for the subdivision known as Tract No. 2153 (Hester - south of Otis Drive near Bay Farm Island Bridge). Councilman McCall moved the extension of time be granted as requested. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose. Speaking on the question, Councilman Freeman suggested that only a three-months extension of time be allowed in order to expedite the filing of the Final Nap and completion of this Tract so the property could be added to the tax rolls as soon as possible. However, the question was put and the motion carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. Noes; None, Present: Councilman Freeman, (1). Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 5. Mr. Frank Gottstein, 731 Haight: Avenue, protested against the salary increases for City employees, He also felt there should be six additional police o[ficers'blred, instead of only four as proposed. Mr. Gottsteiu once more objected to the traffic pattern on Webster Street in conjunction with the apprpachey to the new Posey Tube, and claimed this was increasing the congestion. 6� Mr. Kenneth Boisingcoo, 1335 Burbank Street, remarked that the Council should not be berated for lack of action in cases over which it had no control. REPORTS OF 0FFICE8SL BOARDS, ETCETERA: � v 7. From the Mayor, City Manager and City Auditor, submitting their report on the Count of Money held May 15, 1963, at which time there was the sum of $5,218,231.39 in the City Treasury. The report was noted and ordered filed. ^/ U.' From Public Utilities Board, signed by Mr. G. A. Baxter, Secretary, submitting copy of its Reso- lution No. 2153, "Adopting Budget for Bureau of Electricity, Department of Public Utilities, City of Alameda, for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1964" - and calling attention to the dividend of $725,000. pledged to the City. The communication was noted with interest and ordered filed, � 9. From City Planning Board, signed by the Secretary, recommending amendments to Sections 11-I4A6(d) and 11-14A6(e) of the Alameda Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) relating to the size of building sites and the number of dwelling units allowed on lots less than five thousand square. feet. The Hearing on this matter was set for the next regular meeting of the Council, to be held on July 2, 1963.. lO.v From City Planning Board, signed by the Secretary, recommending amendments to Article 4-D of the Alameda Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) relating to Sign Regulations. The ring on this matter was also set for the next regular meeting of the Council, on July 2, 1963. ll.' From Mc, Stuart C. Dobson, 1425 Court Street, tendering his resignation from the Library Board, effective June 30, 1963, due to his business responsibilities. Councilman Freeman moved the resignation be accepted with regret and a resolution in appreciation of Mr. Dobson's service be prepared for the Council's uction at the next meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman La Croix and unanimously carried. 12: From the Mayor, nominating certain appointees to the several City Boards, as follows: Mr, Gustave Levy, as a member of the Civil Service Board for the term expiring June 30, 1968; Mrs. Rudolph Steinmetz and Mr. We7les Whitmore, Jr., as members of the Social Service Board' for terms expiring June 30, 1966; Mr. Frank Weeden, as a member of the Board of Education for the term expiring June 30, 1967; Mr. John Nazro, Jr., Mr. Herman J. Kihn and Mr. Melvin D. Sanderson as members of the City Planning Board for terms expiring June 30, 1966; Miss Grace S. Powers as a member of the Library Board for the term expiring June 30, 1968; Mr. Donald Bruzzone as a member of the Library Board, to serve the unexpired term of Mr. Stuart C. Dobson, resigned, which term would expire June 30, 1986; Mr. Frank McClintock as a member of the Public Utilities Board for the term expiring June 20, 1967. These nominations were referred to "Resolutions'. I]v/ From City Manager, recommending contract be awarded to W. W. Lang, lop bidder, for the project of Resurfacing Washington Park Tennis Courts, at the total cost of $1,559. Councilman Bose moved the recommendation he adopted and the contract be awarded to Mr. Lang for the specified project at the price quoted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Fine, Noes: None. Absent: None. 14J. From City Manager, advising of the request by Utah Construction & Mining Co. for the exercising of the option by the City of the acquisition of a one-acre parcel of land for public use, situated at Willow Street and Otis Drive in Unit I. Mr. Charles T. Travers of Utah Construction & Mining Co. addressed the Council on this matter and reviewed the negotiations carried on in 1055, which led to "Utah" setting aside a certain amount of land for the City to be used for schools, parks or other public purposes. He stated that the parti- cular parcel now in question had been talked about as a site for a [ire station. Mr, Travers referred to his letters of March 1 and March 15, 1955, in which it was stated that the City would be given the option to purchaue this property at the sum of $2,500. per acre. He remarked that-on several different occasions he had called the City Manager's attention to this option and requested that the City find a public use for the property or return it to "Utah". He said that to the best of his knowledge there was still no determination by the City on a suitable public 'purpose for this land. 8r. Travers pointed out this site had been held for the City under its option letter for over eight years. There was no reversionary clause in the agreement with the City for the dedication of this land. "Utah" had expended the ,sum of $3,134.58 in payment of taxes on this parcel, which was more than the purchase price involved in the option of $1,982.50, 8r, Travers asked that the City determine whether or not it had a suitable public purpose for the land and if not, that it be immediately returned to "Utah". He felt the time had come when some definite action ought to be taken and he stressed the point that "Utah" had given the Juod'tn the people of Alameda for public enjoyment. Councilman Freeman inquired if there was a deadline set in the agreement for taking up this option and Mr. Way replied that the letters referred to stipulated no certain date but under the Fill Agree- ment there was the implication that the City would have to act within a reasonable time. It was also developed that the total amount of land set aside for the City was slightly over twenty-eight acres. Councilman La Croix then moved that, under the terms and conditions of the Fill Agreement dated June 23, 1955, wherein certain lands were set aside for City use - and, in line with the letter of March 15, 1955, in which the City was granted an option to buy certain parcels at the price of S2,500. Per acre, the City exercise its option to purchase this lund at the corner of Willow Street and Otis Drive in Unit Z, for the price of $1,982.50. The motion was seconded by Councilman Freeman. Speaking on the question, Councilman NcCall stated that the City already had quite a bit of property which was not on the tax rolls and unless he could be shown there was a public use for the parcel under consideration, he could not approve its purchase. Be agreed the price quoted for this parcel, which contained eight-tenths of an acre, was a bargain.- 8r. Weller explained that the site had originally been thought of for a fire station and it was his thinking that it was not suitable for such use. He remarked, however, that it might well be that the final decision. would be to construct a fire station at this location. The question was then put and the motion carried on the following roll call vote. Ayes: Four. 'Noes: Councilman McCall, (1) Absent: None. 8z. Way called attention to the fact that this action would necessitate an ordinance to effect the purchase and he would prepare said document for the Council's action at its next meeting. Mr. Travers stated he assumed the City, in taking this action, did not at this time have any definite public use in mind for this piece of land. He inquired what the Council's position would be if', sub- sequently, it could find no public use for this land and wanted to know if the City would then return it to Utah Construction & Mining Co. Mr. Way replied that the Council's action indicated that, although there was no specific public use in mind at the moment, said action was taken in the contem- plation that there would be a public use in the future to which this property could be put. Mr. Travers reviewed certain discussions had over a period of time with the City Manager on this mat- ter and as a result he had written the letter transmitted for the Council's consideration at this meeting. He reiterated that he felt very definitely and specifically that 1 i laod aenc to the Cicy of Alameda for a public purpose - for the benefit of all of the people of the City of Alameda and for no other purpose. He stated that, in his opinion, the City was not merrily free to take this parcel from "Utah' and then sell it or dispose of it to somebody else - a subdivider or a builder, for a profit. He said he thought this would be morally wrong and unfair even though the City could say that by the manner in which the option letter was drawn, it was legally right. Mr. Travers felt the Council should immediately discuss this situation and decide what public use it could make of the land and if it could make no public use of the property, it should promptly make arrangements to return it to Utah Construction & Mining Co. Be said he would like to have "Utah" advised within a reasonable time what public purpose the Council had decided to use this land for. Mr. Weller pointed out that during the many discussions he had had with Mr. Travers he had advised him not to insist upon the City exercising its option for the very reason that, he felt, the Council had no choice but to buy the property on the basis that there was no positive way Lo conclude that there was no public use for this luud. He agreed it would be nice if the Council were in a position to state positively and precisely the public use Lo which the land would be put but, conversely, the Council was not in a position to say absolutely and exactly that there was no possible public use. 0r. Weiler said he felt, therefore, the Council was almost compelled by the force of circumstances co exercise the option. 15J/ From the Recreation Commission, signed by Hr. Alvin Blanchard, Chairman, reviewing its actions toward effecting public use of the Alameda Memorial State Beach, investigation of which was requested by the Council at its last meeting. It was stated that the State Division of Beaches and Parks had ruled that the area could not be open for public use until its full development had been completed. Councilman McColl questioned the maintenance of a State Ranger on the premises if the area could not be used in any wny until its full development. He felt it was a wasted area there which could very well be used for certain recreational activities even in its present condition. President Godfrey asked Councilman McCall to consult with the City Manager on this matter in a further effort to obtain more favorable consideration. Councilman McCall then asked for permission to go to Sacramento co personally interview the proper parties concerned in this case. Councilman Freeman said she understood this matter had been handled by telephone and she suggested the Recreation Commission write to Mr. Jess T. Chaffee, District Superintendent of the State Divi- sion of Beaches and Parks in Monterey to request this information in writing, after which, if neces- sary, a personal follow-up contact could be authorized- It was so agreed and the Clerk was instructed to ask the Recreation Commission to request information in writing on the status of this park as soon as possible. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES: 16. Councilman Erecman introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under prn- vinino of law and the Charter: 'Ordinance No. Nev Series An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 2-5421 , Thereof, Relating to the Collection of Cost of Preparing Delinquent Roll and List," 17. Councilman La Croix introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro- vision of law and the Charter: "Ordinance No. New Series An Ordinance Amending Title IX, Chapter 1, Article 4, of the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Thereto Sections 9-1413 and 9-1414, Relating co Dogs on the South Shore Beach." 18. Councilman McCall introduced the following ordinance, after which it was laid over under pro- vision of law and the Charter: 'Ordinance No. New Series An Ordinance Amending Title IV, Chapter 2, Article 1, of the Alameda Municipal [—' Code by Adding Thereto Section. 4-214, Relating to Motor Vehicles in and Upon Public Parks and Beaches." UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 19.v Councilman Rose commended City Engineer Hanna for his very complete and comprehensive report to the City Manager in response to the letter from the Alameda Garden Club concerning its sugges- tions for the beautification of the City. All agreed it was a very prompt and excellent report on the ubject. A copy thereof had been sent to the Alameda Garden Club. 23. Councilman Freeman referred to the traffic problem on Webster Street which brought up a lengthy discussion of several phases of traffic studies and reports. Hz. Hanna explained the routes pro- posed by both the State Division of Highways and the County Highway Committee, as well as the traffic patterns recommended in the report nf,Wilbur Smith & Associates, Traffic Consultants. He pointed out a definite five-year program of accomplishment was being carried out within the City's local jurisdiction, and his Department worked closely with the State insofar as the highway routes were concerned. The discussion also embraced possible routes through the area between Webster Street and Main Street to serve .Todd Shipyards and the Estuary Housing Project. It was developed that these properties were owned by the United States Navy, the United States Army and the Regents of the University of California - and the City Engineer expressed the hope that some solution might be worked out between all parties involved for use of some route which would take the traffic loadoff of Atlantic Avenue. RESOLUTIONS: • 21, The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6481 Providing for the Amount Per Diem for Officers an Employees of the City of Alameda for Traveling Expenses." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 22. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6482 ^ Authorizing the Execution of a Contract for Services of a Certified Public Accountant for the Fiscal Year l963-1964.^ The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None, Absent: None. 23. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6483 Supporting the Program Recommended by the Alameda County Highway Advisory Committee for Improvement and Development of the State Highway System in Alameda County for the Fiscal Year 1964-1965," The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Crnix'and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 24. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6484 Designating the Number of and Providing for the Compensation of Certain Officers and Other Employees of the City of Alameda." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Four. Noes: 0one, Present: Councilman Freeman, (l). Absent: None. 25. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6485 Appointing Member of the Civil Service Board." (Gustave Levy) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 26. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose; who moved its udoption: "Resolution No. 6486 Appointing Member of the Social Service Board." (Mrs. Rudolph Steinmetz) The motion to adopt said reaolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None, Absent: None. 27. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adnpcion: "Resolution No. 6487 Appointing Membez of the Social Service Board." (Wellrs Whitmore, Jr.) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 28. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6488 Appointing Member of the Board of Education." (Frank Weeden) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 29. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6489 Appointing Member of the City Planning Board." man J. Ki6o> The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following voce. Ayes: Five. Noes: 0one, Absent: None. 30. he following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6490 Appointing Member of the City Planning Board." (John Nazro, Jr.) The motion to adopt said resolution vus.scconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Rzuc, Noes: Councilman McCall, (l), Absent: None. 31. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6491 Appointing Member of he City Planning Board." (Melvin R. Sanderson) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 32. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6492 Appointing Member of the Library Board." (Miss Grace S. Powers) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman McCall and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 33. The following reynlucipn was introduced by Councilman La Croix, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No~ 6493 Appointing Member of the Library Board." (Donald Bruzzone) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Freeman and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 34. The following,: resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6494 Appointing Member of the Public Utilities Bnard." (Frank McClintock) The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll cull carried by the following vote, Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 35. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Freeman, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6495 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Resurfacing of Major Streets in the City of Alameda, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five, Noes: None. &beenc: None. 36. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman Rose, who moved its adoption: "Resolution 0o. 6496 Adopting Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans for Installing Exposed Aggregate Concrete at Lum Park, Calling for Bids and Directing City Clerk to Advertise Same." The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman La Croix and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. 37. The following resolution was introduced by Councilman McCall, who moved its adoption: "Resolution No. 6497 Resolution of the Council of the City of Alameda in Commendation and Appreciation of Donald A. Way, Assistant City Attorney, for His Service to the City." 1 1 N The motion to adopt said resolution was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Fivc, Noes: None. Absent: None. The President then declared all of the foregoing resolutions adopted. ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE: 38. "Ordinance No. 1428, New Series An Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Article 4C, Section ll-14C2 Thereof, and by Adding a Subsection (d) Thereto, Relating to Accessory Parking Spaces Required in All Districts.' Councilman McCall moved the ordinance be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Council- man Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: None. Absent: None. ' ' FILING; 29, Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans No. PW 6-63-13 - Resurfacing of Major Streets in the City of Alameda. 40. Specifications, Special Provisions and Plans Nn, PW 6-63-16 - Installing Exposed Aggregate Concrete in Lum Park, 41. Budget for 1963-64 - Bureau of Electricity. DILLS: 42. An itemized List of Claims against the City of Alameda and the Departments thereof, in the total amount of $41,840.32, was presented to the Council at this meeting. The List was accompanied by certification from the City Manager that the Claims shown were correct. Councilman McCall moved the bills as itemized in the List of Claims filed with the City Clerk on June 13, 1963, and presented to the Council at this meeting, be allowed and paid. The motion was seconded by Councilman Rose and on roll call carried by the following vote. Ayes: Five. Noes: 0one, Absent: None. 43. At this point, Councilman Rose commented that, for the purpose of the record, he wanted to correct a statement made in the Alameda Times-Star of this date, wherein it was stated that Mr. Weller had recommended a ten per cent increase for himself. Councilman Rose emphasized that not only did Mr. Weller not recommend this increase, or any increase for himself, but he refused to have any part in the discussion. This was strictly Council action. President Godfrey concurred that this was correct and said that, actually, Mr, Weller knew nothing about it until the night when it was brought up before the Council as a Body. ADJOURNMENT: 44. There being no further business to come before the meeting, the Council adjourned - to assemble in regular session on Tuesday evening, July 2, 1963, at 7:30 o'clock. Respectfully submit