1999-06-02 ARRA PacketAlameda Reuse &
Redevelopment Authority
(ARRA)
June 2, 1999 Meeting
CANCELED
Next Meeting
June 15, 1999
at 6:55 p.m.
AGENDA
Special Meeting of the Governing Body of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
* * * * * * **
Alameda City Hall
Council Chamber, Room 390 Tuesday, June 15, 1999
2263 Santa Clara Avenue { *PLEASE NOTE *Meeting will begin at 7 :20 p.m.
Alameda, CA 94501 REVISED START TIME} City Hall will open at 6:45 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
2 -A. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of May 5, 1999.
2 -B. Recommendation to approve proposed housing lease revenue budget modification for FY
1998 -1999.
2 -C. Recommendation to approve continuing resolution to spend ARRA lease revenues until FY
1999 -2000 Alameda Point Budget is appropriated.
3. ACTION ITEMS
4. ORAL REPORTS
4 -A. Oral report from BRAG.
4 -B. Oral report from the Deputy City Manager (non- discussion items).
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
(Any person may address the governing body in regard to any matter over which the
governing body has jurisdiction, or of which it may take cognizance, that is not on the
agenda.)
6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
7. ADJOURNMENT
This meeting will be simultaneously broadcast on cable channel 22.
ARRA Agenda -June 15, 1999 Page 2
The next regular ARRA meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, July 7, 1999.
Notes:
• Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the ARRA Secretary at 864-
3400 at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter.
• Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) is available.
• Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print.
• Audio tapes of the meeting are available for review at the ARRA offices upon request.
APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, May 5, 1999
The meeting convened at 5:30 with Chair Appezzato presiding.
ROLL CALL
1.
Present: Chair Ralph Appezzato, Mayor, City of Alameda
Mark Friedman, alternate to Wilma Chan, Alameda County Board of
Supervisors, District 3
Tony Daysog, Councilmember, City of Alameda
Albert DeWitt, Councilmember, City of Alameda
Beverly Johnson, Councilmember, City of Alameda
Barbara Kerr, Councilmember, City of Alameda
Jay Leonhardy, alternate to Jerry Brown, Mayor, City of Oakland
Kathleen Ornelas, alternate to Shelia Young, Mayor, City of San Leandro
Absent: Sandre Swanson, Vice Chair, Ninth Congressional District for Barbara Lee
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
2 -A. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of April 7, 1999.
Mayor Appezzato moved approval of the Consent Calendar. The motion was
seconded by Alternate Friedman and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes: 8. Noes
0. Alternate Ornelas arrived subsequent to the vote; Alternate Swanson was
absent.
3. ACTION ITEMS
3 -A. Recommendation to execute an interim lease through the term of the Master Lease
with the Homeless Collaborative for a 4 -acre urban garden on Parcels 98 and 99.
The public hearing was opened.
Jack Shepherd, Homeless Collaborative, 1415 California Street, Berkeley, noted the legally
binding agreement, which has been negotiated and adopted, has a provision for relocation in it
and that the Collaborative would have no problem including the provision in the interim lease
agreement.
1
2 -A
The public hearing was closed for Authority discussion.
Elizabeth Johnson, ARRA Environmental Planner presented an analysis of four alternative sites
for the location of the organic garden. She said the site in question, Parcel 99, Site #2, is on the
list of sites they analyzed for this report. The sites highlighted represented previous work over
the last two years in attempting to site an entire four acres designated for the Homeless
Collaborative garden in the original agreement.
Ms. Johnson stated that Site #1 was approved at the April meeting as part of the garden. Site #2
was the second part of the garden representing about three acres. (If this site is rejected, another
three acres to meet the commitment has been made to the Homeless Collaborative). Site #3, the
recreation area at the main gate on base, was rejected because it is part of the public benefit
conveyance to the Alameda Recreation Parks Department. Site #4 was considered, however it
was seen as a potentially good development site for future residential development due to its
location. Currently, it is covered with debris from an old building and the water tower is on the
site. The Collaborative rejected this site because of poor soil quality and the cost to clear the site
of the debris. Ms. Johnson noted Site #5, a parking lot across the street from the "0" club which
has served as overflow parking for the club, is currently designated in the use permit conditions
of approval for the housing as an overflow parking space. ARRA Facilities staff decided the
parking area would be too valuable for interim leases and future development in the area to use
as a garden site.
Site #7, a strip of land adjacent to Main Street was suggested by a councilmember. This site has
been obtained by the Public Works Department to convert the former railroad right -of -way into a
green -way park, which incorporates a number of flood improvements to address the flooding in
the area. The Greenway park incorporates a bike path, pedestrian path and a series of detention
basins for flood waters with landscaping and appropriate amenities. This site was rejected
because of the Public Works park project.
The last site Ms. Johnson noted was a small parking area closer to the majority of the homeless
accommodations. The site will provide parking for leases, including areas which have been
committed to the Homeless Collaborative and the BOQ, which has not had an assigned use but
will require a lot of parking, and therefore was rejected.
In summary, Ms. Johnson noted that after reviewing all of the potential sites that met the main
criteria of being a large enough open area, Parcel 99, Site #2 was recommended as an appropriate
location for the Homeless Collaborative Garden.
Chair Appezzato noted since there were no speakers, he opened it for commission, discussion or
motion.
Alternate Friedman moved to accept the recommendation. The motion was seconded by
Member Daysog. Discussion was opened by Member Johnson.
2
Member Johnson stated she had spoken to the City Attorney about including in the agreement a
provision that the Collaborative would agree to future negotiations in the event the site becomes
desirable for development. She then asked the question would it be possible to address this with
the Collaborative to include this in as a provision.
Counsel Highsmith responded when the City negotiates the terms of the interim agreement for
the garden area, inquires can be made and negotiated, and staff can be directed to do that.
Member Johnson asked if this direction could be made tonight and included as a detail to the
agreement.
Counsel Highsmith responded yes.
Member Daysog asked Counsel Highsmith how long is the length of the interim lease.
Counsel Highsmith responded the interim lease can last up to 12 1/2 years which is the remainder
of the lease period between the Navy and the ARRA.
Member Johnson said that converts to 59 years.
Counsel Highsmith noted that once the property is conveyed to the ARRA or the City, either
would enter into individual long term leases with various members of the Collaborative for their
various uses and whatever period time they put their use into, the interim lease would be part of
the total of the 59 years.
Member Daysog voiced the 12 to 59 years Member Johnson suggested is accurate. He said this
would give ARRA or City the flexibility it needs.
Chair Appezzato said the flexibility depends on whether the Homeless Collaborative would do it
or not.
Member Johnson said it would be just a negotiation.
Chair Appezzato asked if all was satisfactory.
Member Johnson responded yes as long as the City Attorney's office confirms it.
Counsel Highsmith responded she would review it because the current form of the interim lease
does not include any provision or opportunity for relocation of use. She noted she would review
the form of the legally binding agreement which has not been finalized and determine if the
provision that Mr. Jack Shepherd is referring to can be moved up and placed in the interim
agreement.
3
Chair Appezzato stated that if it is not in the interim agreement, it will be included in legally
binding agreement. He expressed the Collaborative has been cooperative in agreeing to relocate
to benefit the community.
Member Daysog added to Chair Appezzato's comments that the members of the Collaborative
have been excellent partners in the base conversion. Member Daysog expressed that this issue
should move forward.
Member Kerr expressed several concerns about the recommended site and the Homeless
Collaborative. They were never promised a site; the staff had not surveyed the entire base, and
they were looking for a site that a sealing underneath that would prevent groundwater
contamination, there are acres and acres of concrete out there that would satisfy this. Member
Kerr voiced that Mr. Shepherd spoke of an agreement that only the Homeless Collaborative had
full information about and the officers of ARRA had not seen.
Member Kerr further stated Site #2 they recommend would interfere with the sale of the "Big
Whites" and the Ranchettes once title was received. She also expressed the commercial use
proposed for Site #2 is right in the middle of what should be a residential zoning. It would also
be giving them (Homeless Collaborative) non Tidelands Trust land and there is some legal room
in the City Attorney's memo that we might not have to that.
Member Daysog responded that the success of the base conversion will not be based on 3 or 4
acres for several reasons. He voiced that alternative garden areas could be put anywhere and the
same questions would persist. He expressed the idea of putting the garden on top of cement
convinces him the process should move forward, based on the professionals they are working
with who have some sense of how to do gardens and an understanding of chemical or biological
issues. They are not people who are going to put families or children at risk, they are going to
know if it is safe or not. He expressed this place is no more at risk than any other sites and the
professionals they are working with will inform them weather or not they should proceed.
Member Daysog stated that whether or not the Homeless Collaborative has any effect on the sale
of the big whites, it is important to have a combination of what we have right now. He said that
they will be developing homes on east housing and other parts of FISC which will benefit the
rest of the base.
Member Kerr responded that it is not a community garden like the smaller plot is, it is supposed
to be a commercial nursery and a job training facility and should not be in a residential zone.
She further clarified that Site #2 was no more contaminated than any other site, it was their
design that they put their raised bed gardens over a seal and to prevent groundwater
contamination by putting that seal. She expressed the base conversion is financially so fragile,
that to write off a reduction of price that the big whites and the Ranchettes can sell, is not fiscally
responsible because every dollar is needed to move this redevelopment area to succeed and there
are many individuals who are hindering the process. The latest is the Port of Oakland got a bill
introduced that makes no provision for recompense to the City of Alameda or the redevelopment
4
district for the taking of land for the dredging project. This may seriously harm our ability to
redevelop. She voiced that the HUD money is not needed when money from significant tax
increments is set aside.
Member Daysog questioned Member Kerr's argument that the community garden or horticultural
center is going to hold up the base conversion. The base is 2000 acres, 1500 of it developable,
and its big enough to accommodate four acres for the homeless. It is big enough to
accommodate 60 acres of the upscale housing and it can be done on a prudent level where
everyone benefits.
Member Kerr responded saying it is the initial fiscal health of this redevelopment district that is
important, because without the money to pay for the infrastructure, there will be no
redevelopment district. She said the sale of those houses will be an asset that can sell early to
produce more money just like the redevelopment of FISC and it is important it be done properly.
Chair Appezzato voiced to Member Kerr that she did not include the beltline property which is
20 acres of private property, that a group is trying to turn into public land. He said it is
questionable how a private group can take 20 -30 acres of private land that could help in the
redevelopment zone.
Chair Appezzato noted that this council and past council has gone forth with redevelopment at
Harbor Bay, Send, Raiders, Wind River Project, Marina Village, Drive In Site, Walgreens
property, Webster Street Hotel, and for anyone to indicate that this Council does not care or
concern itself is erroneous. Chair Appezzato agreed with Member Daysog noting that people are
clamoring to get into this prime real estate property.
Member Kerr voiced the point of order she was making was that the City Attorney had instructed
council to not discuss the belt line initiative in public, however the City council could vote to
take a stand on it but it is not a proper subject for discussion in either council meetings or ARRA
meetings.
Chair Appezzato disagreed noting Member Kerr raised the issue of financial crisis in this city. It
is public knowledge that it is going forward.
Member Kerr voiced that everything should be done to launch the redevelopment area. Member
Kerr noted that past council and BRAG had not agreed to this site because the siting of this
commercial project had never been agreed to and this is not something promised to the Homeless
Collaborative. They were promised acreage, it was in the reuse plan, but the siting was "to be
determined."
Alternate Leonhardy move to accept the recommendation. The motion was seconded by
Member Daysog, and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes: 7. Noes -1. Abstentions 0.
Member Daysog approved to move forward. The motion was seconded by Chair
5
Appezzato and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes 7. Noes 1. Abstentions 1
(Swanson).
4. ORAL REPORTS
4 -A. Oral report from the BRAG updating the ARRA on current activities.
BRAG member Andrine Smith was present in place of Chair Lee Perez. No report was given.
4 -B. Oral report from the Deputy City Manager.
No report was given.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON - AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
Mr. Douglas deHann, 1305 Dayton Avenue, discussed the importance of the roles of the
Congressman's office and the county, and their impact from the April meeting. He expressed no
one can second guess or know the kind of dilemma everyone would be in, if these roles were not
in place. He also voiced that the Homeless Collaborative was right in putting a barrier between
the soil and land. He noted they know the ground water is a problem in the area and in the area
of where the marsh crust is located.
6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
Alternate Omelas apologized for missing the last meeting which included the discussion of the
length of the term of this body, due to an official visit from their sister city. She expressed San
Leandro has appreciated having the opportunity to have a voice in this process, especially since
the closing of the base has had a regional impact on the County. They look forward to receiving
further reports from this body and San Leandro will continue to offer its support of the successful
development of Alameda Point.
Chair Appezzato thanked her, noting this is an island, but it operates on a regional level and
without operating regionally, it would not succeed.
Alternate Friedman expressed the success of economic development and every other aspect of
base conversions in the City of Oakland is because Alameda reached such a rapid conclusion of
negotiations with the Homeless Collaborative in such a harmonious way and the other public
benefit conveyances that have been put forth in Alameda Point. In the City of Oakland, the
Department of Defense has rejected their plan for Oak Knoll and they are not much farther along
on the Oakland Army base. He expressed that having reached a positive agreement with the
Homeless Collaborative has been a factor in Alameda's success.
Mayor Appezzato noted that there is not a community of this size that has received as much
6
federal funds as the City of Alameda. He voiced that it is a demonstration of regional
cooperation.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lu retia Akil
Secretary
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Interoffice Memorandum
June 8, 1999
TO: Honorable Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager
SUBJ: Report from the Acting Executive Director recommending that the ARRA approve
the proposed housing lease revenue budget modification for FY 1998 -1999
Background:
In February 1999, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) appropriated the lease
revenue generated by the market rate housing leases. The approved budget did not reflect the
increased revenue for leasing the townhouse units, nor did it adequately anticipate the expenditures
for bringing the townhouse units up to health and safety code and making them desirable for leasing.
The February budget projected revenue sources of $210,732 for 1/1/99- 6/30/99. This projection
was added to the fund balance of $146,387 for a total resources available of $357,119. Since the
townhouse units went on the market in April, and eight units were leased by 4/30/99, revenue is
expected to increase by $35,000 by the end of this fiscal year. In addition to the increase in revenue,
the expenditures for getting the housing units ready are expected to exceed the budgeted $160,000
for the fiscal year by $119,351. The increased expenditures represent costs for getting the remaining
units painted on the outside (trim and touch -up), repairing fencing, increased landscaping expenses,
disperse water assessment funds collected since March 1998 ($34,351), and other essential repairs
to fixtures and property.
Discussion:
The budget approved in February 1999 was as follows:
Property Management and Maintenance $160,000
Consultant Services $40,000
City Cost Allocation $60,000
Reserve $97,119
Total Budget $357,119
Given the increased revenue of $35,000 and the increased expenditures, the proposed revised budget
is as follows:
Property Management and Maintenance $279,351
The increased expenditures represent costs for painting inside and otttside the
townhouse units, increased landscaping fees due to increased acreage leased,
repairing fences, removal of fallen trees, $34,351 transfer of water fees collected
since March 1998 and other essential repairs to fixtures and property.
Honorable Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
June 8, 1999
Page 2
Consultant Services $40,000
City Cost Allocation $60,000
Reserve $12,768
Total Budget $392,H9
Fiscal Impact:
The revenue generated by the housing leases will be sufficient to cover proposed expenditures.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the ARRA approve the proposed housing lease revenue budget modification
for FY 1998 -1999.
Respectfully submitted,
David A. Berger
Deputy City Manager
Community and Economic Development
Attachment: Revised January -June 1999 Housing Lease Revenue Fund Balance Projection
C:\JUNK\REVHSG.REV
Attachment 1
Fund Balance Projection for Housing Lease Revenue
Beginning Balance 12/30/98 (estimate)
Revenue Projection
(1/1/99-6/30/99)
Total Resources
Proposed Expenditures
(1/1/99-6/30/99)
Ending Balance /Reserve 6/30/99 (estimate)
Page 1
$146,387
$245,732
$392,119
$379,351
$12,768
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Interoffice Memorandum
June 9, 1999
TO: Honorable Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: David A. Berger, Deputy City Manager
SUBJ: CONTINUING RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INTERIM EXPENDITURKS
OF ALAMEDA POINT OBLIGATIONS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1999-
°0 FY
Background:
The City of Alameda received a grant of $17.9 million for 2.5 federal fiscal years (4/1/97 - 9/30/99)
from the U.S. Navy to finance municipal services at Alameda Point under a Base Caretaker
Cooperative Agreement.
After the Base Caretaker Cooperative Agreement ends on September 30, 1999, the City will need
to maintain and protect the Alameda Point properties. This will include insuring that landscaping
and infrastructure are maintained at an appropriate level of upkeep to continue to attract tenants to
the site.
Initially, land -based revenue sources made up of lease revenues will be the principal source of
financing both operating and capital costs. In the early years (1999 -00 and 2000 -01), land -based
revenue sources will not be sufficient to cover all asset management costs, i.e. building repairs and
maintenance, public safety services, and maintenance of infrastructures such as water, electrical, and
sewer systems.
Discussion /Analysis
Faced with the challenge of financing the gap between land -based revenues and the maintenance,
operating and immediate capital needs, the City sought the help of Evensen Dodge, Inc. (Municipal
Debt Financial Advisors) and Gardner, Underwood and Bacon (Municipal Management Consultants)
to prepare a financing plan for Alameda Point. Their charge was to analyze and make
recommendations for alternative methods to eliminate this gap, including potential financing, service
and capital cost reductions, or some combination thereof. On May 12, 1999, City Council accepted
a financing plan prepared by these two firms, and directed that the recommended key steps necessary
to structure a lease- backed revenue bond, and prepare documents for Council consideration next
month or August. Council further directed staff to aggressively pursue our previous written request
of the U.S. Navy to extend base caretaker funds through property conveyance.
Honorable Members of the
Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
June 10, 1999
Page 2
The following is a table which illustrates the projected financing gap in the next two years and the
projected balance for the third year (in thousands):
*Reflects deferral of certain capital costs
The financing plan contemplated for Alameda Point includes reduction in operating costs, deferral
of certain capital projects and issuance of debt fully secured by land -based revenues -- leases and
may eventually include proceeds from land sales expected in the 2001 -02 fiscal year.
Budget/Fiscal Impact
Caretaker funds remaining through September 30, -1999, combined with lease revenues, are adequate
to fund Alameda Point public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and administrative costs at present
service levels during the first quarter of the fiscal year starting July 1. In addition, unexpended
federal grants (OEA, EDA) and local matching funds will be available for reappropriation in this
interim budget. The departments that provide services to Alameda Point are in the process of
preparing a full year budget for 1999 -00. The full year budget will include all projected revenue
sources, i.e. remaining caretaker funds, lease revenues, proceeds from debt issuance, etc.
The interim proposed budget for Alameda Point has no impact on the City's general fund.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the continuing appropriation resolution be adopted allowing interim
expenditures from July 1 through September 30, 1999, in order to pay Alameda Point obligations.
A full year budget will be presented to you no later than your September, 1999 meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
David A. Berger
Deputy City Manager
Community and Economic Development
1999 -00
2000 -01
2001 -02
Revenues:
Lease Revenues
$4.582
$5.443
$5.938
Land Sales
0
0
7.337
Available Revenues
$4.582
$5.443
$13.275
Costs:
O & M
$7.805
$7.474
$5.700
Capital
*3.281
*4.736
*5.144
$11.086
$12.210
$10.844
Balance
($6.504)
($6.767)
$2.431
*Reflects deferral of certain capital costs
The financing plan contemplated for Alameda Point includes reduction in operating costs, deferral
of certain capital projects and issuance of debt fully secured by land -based revenues -- leases and
may eventually include proceeds from land sales expected in the 2001 -02 fiscal year.
Budget/Fiscal Impact
Caretaker funds remaining through September 30, -1999, combined with lease revenues, are adequate
to fund Alameda Point public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and administrative costs at present
service levels during the first quarter of the fiscal year starting July 1. In addition, unexpended
federal grants (OEA, EDA) and local matching funds will be available for reappropriation in this
interim budget. The departments that provide services to Alameda Point are in the process of
preparing a full year budget for 1999 -00. The full year budget will include all projected revenue
sources, i.e. remaining caretaker funds, lease revenues, proceeds from debt issuance, etc.
The interim proposed budget for Alameda Point has no impact on the City's general fund.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the continuing appropriation resolution be adopted allowing interim
expenditures from July 1 through September 30, 1999, in order to pay Alameda Point obligations.
A full year budget will be presented to you no later than your September, 1999 meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
David A. Berger
Deputy City Manager
Community and Economic Development
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING INTERIM EXPENDITURES OF ALAMEDA POINT
OBLIGATIONS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1999 -00 FY
WHEREAS, the City of Alameda received a grant of $17.9 million for 2.5 federal
fiscal years (4/1/97 - 9/30/99) from the U.S. Navy to finance municipal services at Alameda Point
under a Base Caretaker Cooperative Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after the Base Caretaker Cooperative Agreement ends on September 30,
1999, ARRA will be developing a financing plan to address the gap in funding resulting from the
loss of Cooperative Agreement funds; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that at the September 1999 Alameda Reuse and
Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) meeting the proposed Alameda Point budget for Fiscal Year
1999 -00 will be submitted which will include the financing plan; and
WHEREAS, there is also approximately $3.76 million in unexpended grant and local
matching funds for OEA and EDA grant monies awarded in FY 1998 -99 which are available to be
carried over to FY 1999 -00; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to authorize payment of Alameda Point obligations
from the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1999 -2000 prior to approval of the FY 1999 -00 Budget;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that ARRA hereby approves interim
expenditures prior to the approval of the ARRA Budget for FY 1999 -00 at the levels set by the
ARRA Budget for FY 1998 -99 in order to pay Alameda Point obligations between July 1 through
September 30, 1999 (in the amount of $565,000) to finance municipal services at Alameda Point.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the ARRA hereby appropriates and approves
expenditure of the remaining unexpended grant and local matching funds for OEA and EDA grant
awards from FY 1998 -99.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a full year budget for FY 1999 -00 will be
presented to the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority no later than the September, 1999
ARRA meeting.
Correspondence / Miscellaneous
'Bldg. Sq. Ft.
8
8
"•••
IN
-
vt
•
n
-
.•-•
§
r-
for
•-■
1 34,5401
§
e
•-•
2:
*
t=
—
,...,
§
—;
§
$
or
F,
*
vi
VI
4
01
oo
cfl
§
4
ov
2
0„
oo
CV
N
00
cv
ON
82,2501
§
qi
ov
8
..t
C4
8
wl
ct,
ov
8
....
vi
§
ei
g
t--..,
in
8
ri,
CV
§
o6
....
*
CC
C
i5
02
2
`•"‘
459
el
o-.
•■4
tol
••-•
el
NO
on
ov
1 398
M
.
el
"
G
...
04
00
0
ov
ov
v.
0
14
6
..-
0.
at
9 ...,
•
sti
..
..,:,
7).
V4
1
-0
To'
41
t
c17
5301
1st
C
0
v■•■
C4
4/r)
CV
Term
R
.
60
C
0
E
.
00
0
0
long term
long term
6 months
long term
long term
6
be
C
0
long term
long term
long term
long term
long term
long tens
00
0
0
ON
1 year
long term
long term
long term
Iong term
long term
E
00
0
0
long term
long term
long term
long term I
Signed Leases & Licenses
Forty Plus (Career Counseling)
Home Auto Repair
Housing Units (31)
11WA Engineers (Steel Fabrication)
Love Center Ministries
Manex Entertainment
Manex Entertainment
......
5
7,
t
..,
Ili
s
!Maritime Administration
Maritime Administration
(Marine Sanitation
.-......-
ipo
4.4
A
Nelson's Marine (Boat Storage)
Nelson's Marine (Boat Svcs.)
Operation Dignity (Homeless)
Piedmont Baseball Fdn.
Piedmont Soccer Fdn. •
Puglia Engr. (Ship Repair)
San Leandro Womens Shelter (Homeless)
Simmba Systems (Records Storage)
Tower Aviation
Trident 3M Services (Port Mgmt.)
United Indian Nations (Homeless Coll.)
West Coast Seaworks (Ship Repair)
Woodmasters (Cabinetry)
Pacific Fine Food, Inc. (Crepe Mfg.)
Richard Miller Photography
Waters, Caldwell Assoc.(Consuitant) I
V
2
..=
w
>
w
t
e„
2
.
0
to)
....
el
ef
el
el
c6
st
el
fel
col
NO
M
t.
00
0
0
N
V
%0
N 00
ON
*
0
VI
v.
WI
cst
In
el
VI
fO.
VI
kr)
V
O-
VI VI
00
V)
Bldg. Sq. Ft.
v
12,430
18,000
4,880
110,000''.
§
S
,
§
0 S1.. °Cc!Ios, .
R
oo
4g *
cn r=
§
c06
§
§
6
Co
§ ffF c§ i
el
cree ›,
oVw )
te'V o t
V)
0 Oei N
eV Ol s
00
C
=
a: 1
r-
Pier 3
near Bldg. 530
00
VI
el
fel
eV
tarmac & 405
292
()
GO
t z,
CV
CO
al
at FISC
0
•
169
24,25
.
76 & 134
ON
el
809, etc.I
(..)
,...,
"
el ol•
oo •-•
,.0 -
00
Of
Term
I long term
E
00
C
0
E
00
C
0
long term
I long term
I long term
E
00
0
0
I long term
!long term
I long term
16 months
I long term
E 1
00 00
0C0C
0000
E
00 CO
Ilong term
E E
00 00
0 0
00
I long term I
I long term
Ishort tern _1
long term
long term
00
0
long tern 1
E E
00 00
0 C
0 0
E
00
0
0
NO. OF PROPERTIES CURRENTLY OCCUPIED [
OCCUPIED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
;Signed Leases & Licenses
A(:ET (Environmental Tech. Incubator)
AC Hornet Foundation
....._.._._
Aizmeda Point Storage (Mini Storage)
1—Alameda Unified School District
Altamont Tech. (Tech. Testing)
Antiques by the Bay (Collectibles Faire)
IBay Ship & Yacht (Ship Repair)
t robac (Warehouse)
}Bu:-eau of Electricity (Storage Yard)
CALSTART (Electric Vehicle Incubator)
CALSTART (Test Track)
Ce llular One (Cell Site)
Geteral Svcs. Admin.(Govt.)
City Garage Carstar (Vehicle Painting)
City of Alameda (Dog Run Park)
City of Alameda (Ferry Terminal Parking)
City of Alameda (Gym & Pool)
City of Alameda (O'Club)
City of Alameda (Public Works)
City of Alameda (Soccer Field)
City of Alameda (Tennis Courts)
CyberTran International (Test Track)
v..
c
Y.
of
.....g.
Oki
;of
'r.
'0"
7.1
(:)
Dignity Housing (Homeless Coll.)
Door Christian Fellowship Church
Dunavant of California (Storage)
Emerg. Svcs. Network (Homeless)
Forem Metal Manufacturing
Fribel Intemat'i. (Concrete Statues) 1
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
PROJECTED FUTURE EMPLOYMENT
—
for
VI
NO
to
00
OS
0
"v
ce ot
vl 0
Co
00 ON
0
CV
•-••
c4
el
CV
el
CV
*
el
fol
CV
0
CV
Co 00
CV CV
ON
CI
00
-4
0,
14 14
WI 4).
t4
4.04
14
14
14
.-.
14
0
......
0
00
-4
CA 1,1
.0.
,...
lo.)
.....
14 ....
1-..
0 ..0
wo
.4 0.,
to
4a. t...)
,..)
....
1TOTAL SOUARE FOOTAGE:
TOTAL PENDING SUBLEASES/SUBtICENSES
><
ILIG1.
e
■
1
an can
T T C (s..Mnw.e Cervira
Positive Strokes Rowing
S L dro Womens' Shelter
Port Distr Warehouse
Orbit Development (Property Mont.)
Miller & Sons (Contractor)
Operation Dignity (Homeless C011.)
g
>4
a 5
ac
Jim Bustos Plumbing
Doctors' Group for Elderly Housing
Container Storage (Personal)
Delphi Productions (Exhibit Displays)
Dignity Housing West
c>
-,
e••■ ......
5*
c)
-.
.R•
e,
c)
-, 1
a' ;
0
( u o g.
AREA 51 (Special Event Productions)
t'..1:C Cs... TTn:., lIIecaornh Ctotinnl
Altamont Technologies (Equip. Mfg.)
Alternative Storage
AREA 51 A t Mf Event)
Alameda County Homeless Coll.
Alameda Naval Air Museum
Alameda Gateway (Shipyard)
ACET (Environmental Tech Incubator)
ACET (Office Area Only)
'AA ..A . i ..
Pending Subleases & Subticenses
29
23
517
531.532.533
..1,...,.pw>.
....,
p.,
5... ',:.,-; a _.
,_.
17
00
.,.
4941
24
—
b9
VS
101
77
Pier 6, FISC
25
170N
taxiway
.
c.
.
.
In
1.11
nboo
14
.—
y,y).,,,y,
to, n.
82388
;) 14
1 22,000
1 270,000
23,700
250,000
12,150
4,000
,...,
10
LA
0
.0-0.
—
.
t..,
)./1
oo
—N,N,
§
4..
xxx
xx
,...,,,,,,J,424,4,4,..),,...,
00-4
m ,..0.,....t
.a — ..000-40,,...0.2..2
24
-0,000-40,
21 4..,,,....,—
ITOTAL COMPLETED SUBLICEINSES:
Rysher Entertainment (Film Co.)
Rosebud Touring Co. (Rehearsal Studio)
Off Duty Productions (Film Co.)
'Microsoft
Nadel Productions (Film Co.)
444
ggg
onn
xx
www
aea
0.0.
00.
GO
VI
0.
5'
CA
Industrial Light & Magic (Film Co.)
Mass Illusions (Film Co.)
Great Benefit Productions (Film Co.)
'Disney Studios
Clubhouse Pictures (Film Co.)
,
)
)
CChamber of Commerce/Bur. of Elect. (t raae Expo)
AREA 51 Productions (Auto Mfg. Survey)
Academy of Model Aeronautics ^^ i
4).
1,>
8
,G
a
*8
,e >
0
4).
0
)0'
0
,G
Bt gs.
Ann A
Emus. Al
d 24/25
to
tAta
wt.' t....)"
tat.)
474*
8.—.
(Nt.)•
Ccl
,..,
.--
-....
)1.8 t.>
,G
n.uuway a.+
11