Loading...
1997-03-05 Special ARRA Minutes APPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, March 5, 1997 Carol Korade, City Attorney, clarified that this meeting complied with the Brown Act, being properly noticed and placed on the agenda. However, to insure the ARRA’s internal rules and regulations were followed, she wanted to clarify that the Chair concurred with the meeting being called. The meeting convened at 8:30 p.m. with Chair Appezzato presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Ralph Appezzato, Mayor, City of Alameda Roberta Brooks, alternate to Vice-Chair Sandré Swanson, District Director, 9th Congressional District Mark Friedman, alternate to Wilma Chan, Alameda County Board of Supv., District 3 Jay Leonhardy, alternate to Henry Chang, Jr./Elihu Harris, Mayor, City of Oakland Kathleen Ornelas, alternate to Ellen Corbett, Mayor, City of San Leandro Albert DeWitt, Councilmember, City of Alameda Greg Alves, alternate to Karin Lucas, Councilmember, City of Alameda John Abrate, alternate to Barbara Kerr, Councilmember, City of Alameda Tony Daysog, Councilmember, City of Alameda Lee Perez, Ex-officio, Base Reuse Advisory Group Absent: Berresford Bingham, Ex-officio, Alameda Unified School District 2. CONSENT CALENDAR - None. 3. ACTION ITEMS 3-A. Authorizing the Chairman of the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) to write a letter indicating the ARRA’s interest in participating in the Coastal Conservancy’s Dredge Materials Reuse Project. Chair Appezzato asked that a letter not be written at this point but that he, as Mayor of the City of Alameda, will attend the Seaport Advisory Committee meeting on March 18 to listen, discuss, and report back to the ARRA on all discussion. Alternate Leonhardy so moved. The motion was seconded by Alternate Abrate. Alternate Brooks stated that this item had been agendized because it is the utmost priority to get the 220-acre designation for a container port lifted. There is a concern that the Seaport Advisory Committee may not want to lift that designation in order to insure that dredge spoils can be dumped here. Her intention in advocating participation in the dredge materials reuse study is to separate the issue of dredge spoils from the port priority designation. Her hope is that this would provide Mayor Appezzato with ammunition to show BCDC that removing the designation does not preclude Alameda from accepting dredge materials. Alternate Friedman said that the ARRA should empower the Mayor to go as their representative to discuss this issue and, if it serves the purpose of getting the seaport designation removed, to proceed with the study. Chair Appezzato clarified that Alternate Friedman was saying that if they agree to lift the seaport designation, it is the ARRA’s choice to allow the study and it will be the sole choice of the City to make a final decision on whether or not to accept dredge spoils. BRAG Vice-Chair Helen Sause stated that the BRAG heard Mr. Fishman’s 2-A _Printed on recycled paper 1 presentation on the dredge spoils study at its last meeting. Their position is that participating in the study would provide the information needed to assess whether it would benefit the City. Chair Appezzato then stated that if BCDC lifts the seaport designation, the decision on whether to proceed with accepting dredge spoils rests with the City based solely on the benefit to the City. Member Daysog concurred that the issue of lifting the seaport designation needed to be separated from the dredge materials issue. Nonetheless, he stated that he is convinced it is the Port of Oakland who would like to place their dredge spoils on the site as it is in their economic interest to do so. At the same time, it is in the ARRA’s best interest to negotiate very strenuously with the Port of Oakland in regard to the airport expansion and the flight overpass. Chair Appezzato clarified the motion: “If I get a guarantee that they will lift the seaport designation, you are empowering me to say, ‘study it and let us see how the study comes out’.” The clarification was accepted by Alternate Leonhardy and Alternate Abrate. The motion passed unanimously - 9. 4. ORAL REPORTS - None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) - None. 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM GOVERNING BODY - None. 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chair Appezzato at 8:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Margaret E. Ensley ARRA Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. _Printed on recycled paper 2