Loading...
2015-07-21 Regular CC MinutesRegular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -JULY 21, 2015- -7:00 P.M. Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor Spencer – 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES (15-465) Councilmember Oddie requested that the Del Monte hearing [paragraph no. 15-480] be moved before the City Manager recruitment [paragraph no. 15-481] PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (15-466) Proclamation Declaring Support of the Medicare Turns 50 National Campaign. Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to Josie Camacho, Alameda Labor Council. Ms. Camacho made brief comments and invited everyone to attend a rally. (15-467) Proclamation Declaring August 4, 2015 as Coast Guard Day. Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to Vice Admiral Charles Ray, US Coast Guard. Vice Admiral Ray made brief comments and showed a video. (15-468) The Interim Assistant City Manager stated the flags were lowered to half-staff in honor of the four Marines and one Navy personnel recently shot in Chattanooga, Tennessee. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (15-469) Robb Ratto, Downtown Alameda Business Association, invited everyone to attend the Art and Wine Faire and presented glasses to the City Council. (15-470) Mike Browny, Alameda, expressed concern over the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s map [paragraph no. 15- 478]; expressed his support for the Mayor. The City Attorney reminded speakers Oral Communications is for items not on the agenda. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 2 (15-471) Diane Cristales, Alameda; Liza Gabato Morse, Alameda; Julie Morse; and Allen Sangco, Alameda (read a letter on behalf of Gray Harris); discussed the Sister City events with Dumaguete, Philippines and expressed support for Mayor Spencer. CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*15-472) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on June 16, 2015. Approved. (*15-473) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,703,310.26. (*15-474) Recommendation to Approve a Letter of Support for Assembly Bill 1182 (Santiago, Bonta, Cooley and Pan) Second Hand Dealer Bill. Accepted. (*15-475) Recommendation to Award a Fifth Amendment in the Amount of $50,247 to Schaaf & Wheeler for the Preparation of Engineering Documents for the Upgrade of the City of Alameda Sewer Pump Stations, Phase 2: Immediate Improvements, No. P.W. 12-10-34. Accepted. (*15-476) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for Group 2 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety Improvements Project, No. P.W.03-14-10. Accepted. (*15-477) Resolution No. 15066, “Authorizing the Public Works Director to Submit Used Oil Payment Program Applications to the California Department of Resources and Recovery for All Available Payment Programs Under the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act for the Period of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020.” Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (15-478) Informational Report on the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Proposed Revisions to Floodplain Maps Which Could Impact Alameda Property Owners. The Public Works Coordinator made brief comments and Eric Simmons FEMA, gave a Power Point presentation. In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese’s inquiry, Mr. Simmons stated the proposed flood zones are based on today’s conditions, not on future sea-level rise; FEMA developed a Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 3 bay-wide model which shows more accurate and precise information on flood zone areas. Councilmember Daysog inquired the number of properties in the current floodplain, to which Mr. Simmons responded 1,760 properties. In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry, Mr. Simmons stated he does not have information on how many properties have flood insurance but could provide the information later. In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry, Mr. Simmons stated FEMA has adopted a policy that allows property owners to purchase the least expensive flood insurance, no matter what flood zone they live in, through the National Flood Insurance Program. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether areas not mapped are not in the floodplain, to which Mr. Simmons responded FEMA studied all flood hazards in the City, but the new study did not include every area of the island. In response to Councilmember Oddie’s inquiry, Mr. Simmons stated FEMA has had on- going coordination to include new development projects in the floodplain; stated the map highlights the areas. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the Public Works Coordinator stated the maps identify special hazard zones now; Council is required to adopt new maps once FEMA finishes their public process and issues a letter of final determination; the City has six months to adopt the new rate insurance maps into the Municipal Code. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry regarding the timeframe, the Public Works Coordinator stated the City is poised to act and is just waiting for FEMA to post the study on the federal register; at the end of 90-day appeal period, FEMA could be ready to issue a letter of final determination. Mr. Simmons stated the timeline depends on what kind of comments are received; FEMA would resolve issues in coordination with the impacted cities; the map change does not impact just the City of Alameda; typically, new flood insurance rates go into effect 18 months after the preliminary issuance. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what is the estimated date of register, to which Mr. Simmons responded in next three to four weeks. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested City staff to do their best efforts to get the word out to the public on the website to be proactive. The Interim Assistant City Manager stated staff will send a letter to every affected homeowner. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 4 Expressed opposition to her home being included in the flood zone: Kari Thompson, Alameda. Mayor Spencer concurred with Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft; stated the City should post in newspapers and notice residents in addition to the letters; requested the whole map be available in the Planning Department for the public to view. In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, the Public Works Coordinator stated staff has already confirmed FEMA’s conclusions based on existing conditions. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the public does not understand the ramifications if the City does not comply. The Public Works Coordinator stated the 90-day appeal period has not started and the project is not a done deal; dialogue can still occur between the public and FEMA; once maps are issued, property owners have the option of doing an elevation certificate which is a document that substantiates the changes and newer information. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what the criteria is for an appeal, to which Mr. Simmons responded FEMA is open to any technical or scientific data in an appeal; stated one common situation is a homeowner has an elevation certificate which shows their property is at or above elevation level, FEMA can clarify and make modifications to the map. Councilmember Oddie inquired the cost for a homeowner to hire an engineer to do the elevation certificate; to which Mr. Simmons responded homeowners could share the cost, which ranges from $300 to $1,000 depending on the property location. Councilmember Oddie stated homeowners are in a bad position either way: they have to pay to get a survey or pay for insurance; if homeowners submit an appeal, the City should support the appeals if there is a belief that the FEMA maps are not valid. The Public Works Coordinator stated the City is a pass-through body; appeals are for FEMA to consider. Councilmember Daysog inquired how analysis was done. The Associate Civil Engineer responded the hydrologist looked at FEMA data and reviewed methods of calculating base elevation of the flood plain; the hydrologist calculated that the still water elevation would have time to go inland during just the high tide or storm event. In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry regarding calculation inputs, the Associate Civil Engineer responded the elevation data came from the County and was checked against FEMA data. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 5 Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the findings were based on meta data analysis, to which the Associate Civil Engineer responded in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry, the Public Works Coordinator stated property owners should not be discouraged from pursuing their own survey. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how residents will find out about the survey certificate and information to lower their bill, to which the Public Works Coordinator responded specific information will be provided at a public meeting and staff will integrate the information in the letter. The Interim Assistant City Manager noted that flood insurance is only required on federally insured mortgages. (15-479) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 2-23 to Article II Concerning the Creation of a Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC); and (15-479 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Article XIII to Chapter VI Concerning the Review of Rent Increases. Introduced. The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation. In response to Councilmember Oddie’s inquiry regarding the definition of a housing unit, the Community Development Director responded the ordinance only covers stand-alone units. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the Housing Authority is governed by the ordinance, to which the Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the Housing Authority has a separate process for appeal under federal law. Councilmember Daysog inquired the legal reason why landlords who rent a room are not subject to the Code, to which the Community Development Director responded the logic was to align consistency with Municipal Code. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the study to analyze impacts of rising rents in Alameda commenced, to which the Community Development Director responded the kickoff meeting was today. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the study will review single room renters, to which the Community Development Director responded the focus is on free- standing renters, not room renters. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the cities of Fremont and San Leandro have similar provisions; Fremont was adopted in 1990 and San Leandro in 2001. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 6 Mayor Spencer inquired whether a room renter could go to the RRAC to appeal a rent increase, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated there is no formal ordinance; that she is not aware of any room renters complaining about rent increase. In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, the Community Development Director stated there is no downside to changing the provisions to include room renters; the focus is to be consistent with zoning code. Read a letter into the record on behalf of Angela Hockabout expressing concern over rent increases: Catherine Pauling, Alameda. Expressed support for rent control: Barbara Duncan, Alameda. Urged the Council to move forward with more affordable housing: Ute, Alameda. Outlined her RRAC case and rental increases; expressed concern over her situation: Anette Zielinski, Alameda. Stated service workers are needed for success of the region; rents are rising faster than wages; thriving tech business takes time to trickle down; expressed support for moving forward: Bill Smith, Renewed Hope. Expressed support for strengthening the RRAC; urged Council to look at innovative solutions to help renters: Pamela Tozer, Alameda. Urged approval of the language as presented: Anne McKereghen, Alameda. Stated the ordinance will help a little bit; urged introduction; expressed support for Angela Hockabout’s suggestions: Jon Spangler, Alameda. Outlined his RRAC case: Garfield Kincross, Alameda. Urged approval of the ordinances: Karen Bey, Alameda. Stated each case should proceed individually: Susan Loorz, Alameda. Expressed support for the small boost for renters; provided an example of Healdsburg: Laura Thomas, Renewed Hope Housing Advocates. Expressed support for the staff recommendation: Kari Thompson, Alameda. In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese’s inquiry regarding the definition of a housing unit, the Community Development Director stated the modification would be as follows: the definition of housing unit will be deleted and the definition under Residential Property Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 7 would read: “residential property means any housing unit including a room or group of rooms designed and intended for occupancy by one or more persons, or a mobile home”. Councilmember Oddie inquired what data will Council receive in December. The Community Development Director responded Council would receive a quantitative study about impacts of rising rents for Alameda renters; stated the consultant will look at impacts by tenure, gender, age, and ethnicity; Council could direct staff on next steps in terms of policy recommendations, based on the quantitative data. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the analysis could include a moratorium if wide- spread rent increases are found, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would like to see a wide range of policy options for Council to address the issue. The Community Development Director stated the ordinance requires staff to report annually; staff will have data points in 12 months. Councilmember Oddie stated it makes sense for Council and the community to have more input in selection of members RRAC members; he would like a public application process with public interviews. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Oddie about the selection process; stated good, workable solutions are found if the Council and community work together. Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of the rent increase ordinance with the modification to remove the definition of a housing unit and to include the definition of a residential property as stated by the Community Development Director [“residential property means any housing unit including a room or group of rooms designed and intended for occupancy by one or more persons, or a mobile home”]. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. *** Councilmember Daysog left the dais at 9:01 p.m. and returned at 9:02 p.m. *** Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance creating the RRAC. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote – 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog – 1.] Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 8 (15-480) Summary Title: Several actions for the Master Plan for the Del Monte Warehouse Project, which was approved in December 2014, including subdividing the property, authorizing an agreement to transfer certain City owned land to the Housing Authority and outlining the requirement to develop affordable housing units. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15067, “Approving PLN15-0165 - a Seven- Lot Tentative Subdivision Map at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue to Implement the 2014 Del Monte Master Plan.” Adopted; (15-480 A) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the Purchase Option Agreement Between the City of Alameda and the Alameda Housing Authority and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents [Requires Four Affirmative Votes], which Transfers 0.47 Acres of City-Owned Real Property Identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 079-0383-001 and -002 Located at the Northeast Corner of the Intersection of Buena Vista Avenue and Sherman Street From the City of Alameda to the Alameda Housing Authority For the Construction of a 31-Unit Affordable Senior Housing Development. Introduced; (15-480 B) Resolution No. 15068, “Approving An Affordable Housing Agreement Between the City of Alameda and TL Partners I, L.P. Outlining the Requirements to Develop 55 Affordable Units, Including the 31-Unit Affordable Rental Housing Development on Parcel 3 at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute the Agreement.” Adopted. The City Planner and the Housing Authority Director of Housing and Development gave a Power Point presentation. Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired what would happen if funding is not secured. The Housing Authority Director responded affordable housing funding is always over- subscribed; if funding is not secured in the first year, it will succeed in the second year; the State Allocating Committee recently revised regulations for smaller projects to have a better shot; there are several other options if obtaining funding fails completely; stated one option would be for the Housing Authority to apply for competitive tax credits and the developer to provide gap funding; another option would be the Housing Authority would apply for a secondary non-competitive tax credit program; the program is not as financially lucrative; the Housing Authority would be willing to increase the contribution of public resources subject to Board of Commissioners approval. In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese’s inquiry, the City Planner responded that the project must provide 55 affordable housing units in any event. In response to Councilmember Oddie’s inquiry regarding the building height limits, the City Planner stated the Master Plan establishes a 55 foot height limit; the Housing Authority project’s height is 37 feet; if the Housing Authority does not develop the project, Tim Lewis Communities could still develop at the 55 foot limit. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 9 Councilmember Oddie stated the senior housing design does not seem to fit in at the Del Monte site; inquired whether Council still has the ability to influence the design. The Assistant City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the design has already been approved by the Planning Board and the ten day review period has expired. Councilmember Daysog stated understanding the theory behind the design would be helpful to the public; requested an explanation. Stephen Hegedus, BAR Architects, responded the senior building was designed in contrast so as not to mimic the original building and broken down to have a townhome scale. Mayor Spencer inquired whether 24 moderate income homes would be available, to which the City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated single and family housing would be available regardless of age. In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, Ms. Grossman, Tim Lewis Communities, stated the bedroom sizes of the 24 units would be spread proportionately for the building. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the project would preclude senior housing being developed at another site, to which the Housing Authority Director responded in the negative; stated decisions are separate; one project would not have bearing over other projects. In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry about crosswalk safety, the City Planner stated the project is conscious of crosswalk safety and can ensure seniors have sufficient time to cross to Little John Park; stated a new intersection will be built and reconstruction of the Buena Vista Avenue and Sherman Street intersection will be done to improve pedestrian connections. In response to Councilmember Oddie’s inquiry, the City Planner stated there will be a flashing beacon at the crosswalk. *** Councilmember Daysog left the dais at 9:35 p.m. and returned at 9:36 p.m. *** Urged Council to move forward: Kari Thompson, Alameda. Stated that she supports the senior housing, which is safe; outside amenities should comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act; urged approval: Audrey Lord-Hausman, Alameda. Expressed support for the project: Art Lenhardt, Alameda. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 10 Expressed support for senior housing, the Housing Authority and the location: Rosemary Reilly, Alameda Meals on Wheels. Expressed support for the project; suggested parking spaces be marked: Pamela Tozer, Alameda. Expressed support for senior housing and the design: Anne McKereghan, Alameda. Stated Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC) supports the project; expressed support for a covered walkway: Jon Spangler, ARC. Stated there is a need for senior housing: Laura Thomas, Renewed Hope Housing Advocates. The City Planner noted a minor amendment was added: a sentence to the non- discrimination clause of the affordable housing agreement which states the project is going to be a Senior Housing Project. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution approving PLN15-0165 - a seven-lot Tentative Subdivision Map at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue to implement the 2014 Del Monte Master Plan. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated focusing on the bookends of the project, the entry level young people, and on the other side the seniors, is important; he is pleased to support the project. In response to Mayor Spencer’s inquiry, the City Planner stated staff will review a covered walkway design and keep Council posted. Councilmember Daysog stated moving forward with the project is imperative; design aspects can be ironed out later. Mayor Spencer clarified that Council is addressing a property issue; senior housing has to be a separate building. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. Councilmember Oddie moved introduction of ordinance authorizing the Purchase Option Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Alameda Housing Authority and authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute all necessary documents, which transfers 0.47 acres of City-owned real property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 079-0383-001 and -002 located at the Northeast corner of the intersection of Buena Vista Avenue and Sherman Street from the City of Alameda to the Alameda Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 11 Housing Authority for the construction of a 31-unit affordable senior housing development. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Spencer noted four votes are required. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of resolution approving an Affordable Housing Agreement between the City of Alameda and TL Partners I, L.P. outlining the requirements to develop 55 affordable units, including the 31-unit affordable rental housing development on parcel 3 at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue and authorizing the Interim City Manager to execute the agreement. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. *** Mayor Spencer called a recess at 10:08 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:19 p.m. *** (15-481) Recommendation to Provide Input to Avery & Associates Regarding the Recruitment Brochure for the City Manager Recruitment. Paul Kimura, Avery and Associates, gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she likes the brochure which includes new development; the photos were good. Mayor Spencer stated the socio-economic diversity of the community should be represented. Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired when recruiting will start, to which Mr. Kimura responded after Council approves the brochure, hopefully tonight. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is prepared to move approval of the item; inquired how the Mayor’s changes would be incorporated. Mr. Kimura responded the brochure has room to mention diversity; emphasized that the brochure is a marketing brochure; he tried to under-communicate to ensure it is brief to attract diverse candidates; someone who recognizes or can add benefits could be discussed under the ideal candidate profile. Mayor Spencer stated that she is still concerned about diversity being included in the brochure. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 12 Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the net is being cast wide; Alameda would be best served if the candidate pool is as wide as possible; there is nothing wrong with saying Alameda is highly educated and has cultural diversity; stated the City is in the San Francisco Bay Area and does not need to be ashamed of good education; Alameda touts its school system. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he does not think people will read the brochure; stated people will understand there is a City Manager position open in the City of Alameda; they can Google it; that he does not want to spend any more time on the issue tonight. *** (15-482) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items. Councilmember Daysog moved approval [of considering the remaining items]. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog and Matarrese – 2. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie and Mayor Spencer – 3. The Interim City Manager stated the ordinance on part time sick leave [paragraph no. 15-483] needs to be addressed to address a change in State law. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of considering the item. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. *** Stated Alameda’s median earnings is $61,000: Carol Gottstein, Alameda. Councilmember Daysog stated that he likes the brochure as it is; he does not want to send the wrong message; there should be parameters. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she concurs with Councilmember Daysog and Vice Mayor Matarrese; just get the train out of the station. (15-483) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Deleting Section 25-2.4 Concerning the Accrual of Sick Leave By Certain Part Time Employees. Introduced. The Human Resources Analyst II gave a brief presentation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 13 Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what takes the place of the deleted code, to which the Human Resource Analyst II responded it depends on what happens here tonight; stated an administrative policy has been drafted. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the administrative policy is approved at the executive level and not by Council, to which the Human Resource Analyst II responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie moved introduction of ordinance amending the Alameda Municipal Code by deleting Section 25-2.4 concerning the accrual of sick leave by certain part time employees. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how will it will be determined whether sick leave is accrued one hour per every three days worked or front-loaded 28 hours at date of hire. The Human Resource Analyst II responded the recommendation is any part-timer hired on a variable work schedule would receive one hour accrual per every three days worked; stated front-loading is only for seasonal workers such as Recreation and Park employees. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote – 5. (15-484) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Various Sections of Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) in Chapter II (Administration) and Adding New Sections 2-90.3, 2-90.4 and 2-91.18 Concerning Local Standards to Ensure Public Access to Public Meetings and Public Records. Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (15-485) The Interim City Manager announced that negotiations would commence with the following bargaining units: Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA); Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA); Electric Utility Professional Association of Alameda (EUPA); Alameda Police Officers Association Non- Sworn Unit (PANS); and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW). ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2015 14 COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (15-486) Councilmember Daysog noted that when he left the dais he was not recusing himself on the vote for the rent ordinance. (15-487) Councilmember Oddie stated the public should be able to move on and put the Dumaguete issue in the past. (15-488) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the Restoration Advisory Board meeting; expressed concern over not receiving notice about the tour. (15-489) Councilmember Oddie outlined the actions Council has taken in the past 8 months. (15-490) Mayor Spencer encouraged anyone to meet with her if they have any concerns; addressed Sister City events with Dumaguete, Philippines. (15-491) Councilmember Daysog stated that he has reached out to other Filipino Americans in the community who agree that they want to continue with a Sister City relationship. (15-492) Consideration of Mayor’s Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Art Commission, Recreation and Park Commission, and Transportation Commission. Mayor Spencer nominated Arnold Brillinger and Susan Deutsch for the Commission on Disabilities Issues; David Mitchell and Sandy Sullivan for the Planning Board; Daniel Hoy for the Public Arts Commission; Ronald Limoges and Adam Trujillo for the Recreation and Parks Commission; and Chris Miley for the Transportation Commission. ADJOURNMENT (15-493) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 10:54 p.m. in memory of the five service members killed in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.