Loading...
2001-09-18 Regular CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - SEPTEMBER 18, 2001- -7:30 P.M. Mayor Appezzato convened the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:41 p.m. Vice Mayor DeWitt led the Pledge of Allegiance. Pastor Dave Nederhood, Christian Reformed Church, gave the Invocation. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Dewitt, Johnson, Kerr and Mayor Appezzato - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (01 -485) Tribute to the United States of America in memory of our fellow Americans who lost their lives on September 11, 2001. Edison School Second Grade students in Ms. Mongerson's, Mrs. Sherman's and Ms. Downey's classes sang a patriotic medley of "America the Beautiful," "God Bless America," and "This Land is Your Land." Alameda Civic Light Opera performer, Laurie Deseguirant, sang "God Bless the USA." Don Bergen, Alameda, stated Congresswoman Barbara Lee voted not to support President Bush and the United States Congress in waging a war against terrorism; most Alameda citizens do not support Congresswoman Lee; urged the City Council to consider a Resolution of non - support of Congresswoman Lee's vote at the next City Council Meeting. (01 -486) Presentation on the Emergency Operations Plan. Fire Department Captain Rick Zombeck gave a Power Point presentation outlining the Emergency Operations Plan, recent revisions to the Plan and instances when the Plan would be used. The City Manager thanked the Fire Department staff for activating the Emergency Operations Center last Tuesday [September 11]. Harry Hartman, American Red Cross, thanked the Fire Department for working with Red Cross on the Plan; stated Red Cross's primary job during disasters is to provide support and direct relief, e.g., mental health, mass care, and feeding; the City and Red Cross have worked together to provide material and classes to prepare people Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 September 18, 2001 for disasters. (01 -487) Mayor Appezzato announced that a local lawyer, Mike Maloney, has arranged a fundraiser, sponsored by Rotary and Kiwanis, to be held on Sunday, September 23 from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Elks Lodge; funds raised will go to victims [of September 11, 2001 tragedy] on the East Coast. (01 -488) Proclamation declaring October 2, 2001 as Walk and Roll Your Child To School Day in the City of Alameda. Mayor Appezzato read the proclamation and presented it to Audrey Lord Hausmen, Pedestrian Friendly Alameda. (01 -489) Proclamation declaring the month of September, 2001 as Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month in the City of Alameda. Mayor Appezzato read the proclamation and presented it to Barbara McClury, Xanthos, Inc. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Appezzato announced that the recommendation to approve the Sixth Amendment to the City Attorney Contract [paragraph no. 01- 491], the Resolution Declaring Support for Measure A, [paragraph no. 01 -504], and the Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing Section 4 -37 [paragraph no. 01 -506] were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number] ( *01 -490) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings (Closed Sessions), Special Joint City Council and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting (Closed Session) and the Regular City Council Meeting held on September 4, 2001. Approved. (01 -491) Recommendation to approve Sixth Amendment to the City Attorney Contract to provide for vesting of Benefits. Councilmember Kerr stated the three principal officers of the City requested increased retirement benefits, which will cost the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 September 18, 2001 taxpayers $20,000; that she did not support the increase and will not support the City Attorney's current request; the City is entering into negotiations with its largest union; the rank and file should be taken care of first; the Sixth Amendment provides the City Attorney with benefits beyond the benefits previously approved for the three officers; noted her vote does not reflect her opinion of the City Attorney's performance. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, DeWitt, Johnson and Mayor Appezzato - 4. Noes: Councilmember Kerr - 1. ( *01 -492) Recommendation to approve City's Response to 2000 -01 Alameda County Grand Jury Report. Accepted. ( *01 -493) Recommendation to accept Year -end Financial Report for 2000 -01 Fiscal Year. Accepted. ( *01 -494) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Mastick Senior Center Heating and Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), No. P.W. 10- 00 -17. Accepted. ( *01 -495) Recommendation to adopt Procurement Documents and authorize Call for Bids for Express II Ferry Vessel Conversion Project, No. P.W. 08- 01 -22. Accepted. ( *01 -496) Recommendation to award Contract to Redgwick Construction Company in the amount of $1,971,000 for Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 22, No. P.W. 04- 01 -11. Accepted. ( *01 -497) Recommendation to award Contract to Younger - Wunar, Inc., in the amount of $198,400 for the Washington Park Americans with Disabilities Act Restrooms Project, No. P.W. 10- 00 -16. Accepted. ( *01 -498) Recommendation to accept work of Rubicon Enterprises for Landscape Maintenance of Median Strips and Special Areas for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2001, No. P.W. 02- 99 -05. Accepted. ( *01 -499) Recommendation to accept the work of TruGreen LandCare for Pruning Trees within the City of Alameda for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2001, No. P.W. 02- 99 -06. Accepted. ( *01 -500) Recommendation to accept the work of Action Maintenance Systems for Janitorial Services in Various City Buildings Located in Alameda for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2001, No. P.W. 02- Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 September 18, 2001 99 -07. Accepted. ( *01 -501) Resolution No. 13393, "Authorizing Filing of an Application for the Tinker Avenue Extension Project for Funding Inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program." Adopted. ( *01 -502) Resolution No. 13394, "Authorizing Execution of First Amendment to Maintenance Agreement Between Port of Oakland and City of Alameda for Landscape Maintenance on Harbor Bay Parkway." Adopted. ( *01 -503) Resolution No. 13395, "Updating the City of Alameda Emergency Operations Plan." Adopted. (01 -504) Resolution No. 13396, "Declaring Support for Measure A, Alameda Unified School District Parcel Tax Measure." Adopted. Carla Greathouse, Alamedans for Better Schools, stated Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) currently faces difficult circumstances; encouraged unanimous endorsement of Measure A; stated AUSD receives less money per student than surrounding school districts; annual educational spending is almost $1,500 less per student than the National average and almost $1,000 less than nearby districts; AUSD cut over $1 Million from its budget last spring; without an additional revenue source, AUSD will be required to cut an additional $2 Million next year; for the past two years, Alamedans for Better Schools explored all avenues for augmenting AUSD funding; AUSD provides quality public education with limited resources; AUSD is running lean; administration is doing everything possible to maximize the District's take of State and federal tax dollars; the financial base for operating schools comes from the State and is determined by a formula set in place decades ago; the formula resulted in AUSD receiving the fewest education dollars per child of any school district in Alameda County and the bottom 200 of districts statewide; AUSD cannot look to the State for assistance with ongoing financial difficulties; the local community should augment public school funding, as is done in many surrounding communities; in August, the Alameda Board of Trustees placed Measure A on the ballot to provide additional local funding for a limited 5 -year period; every penny will stay in Alameda; without Measure A, AUSD will have to eliminate teaching positions, increase class sizes and eliminate critical educational programs; seniors 65 and older will receive an exemption; an independent citizens oversight committee will monitor expenditures to ensure Measure A monies are spent properly. Councilmember Johnson requested Ms. Greathouse to explain how the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 September 18, 2001 exemptions for seniors will work. Ms. Greathouse responded seniors 65 and older can receive exemption on their primary residence; the exemption process is used statewide; the District will provide a form; seniors must show proof of age and the tax bill of their primary residence. Martha O'Connell Dawdy, Alameda, stated the senior exemption is misleading; there is no guarantee that funds go directly into classrooms; salary increases went to administrators, not only teachers; teachers improving results in classrooms should receive a bonus; the District spent close to $100,000 for a survey, which indicated only 380 of citizens would vote for the measure; the assessment per parcel is unfair; a condominium on Shoreline pays $109, South Shore Shopping Center pays $327, Harbor Bay Shopping Center pays $109 because it is on one parcel, Marina Village pays $981 because it is on nine parcels, and a $1 Million dollar home pays $109; Berkeley's tax is computed on a square footage basis; the Superior Court Judge required modification of language pertaining to seniors; the case was not thrown out; Assemblymember Wilma Chan admits the problem lies with the State; State Senator Don Perata and Assemblymember Chan should address the matter; Senator Perata's website indicates education is his primary concern, however he does not serve on any education committees; Assemblymember Chan has backed Assembly Bill 193; Senator Perata has not taken a stand on Senate Bill 5, which would revise the State's formula. Mayor Appezzato stated that he plans to support Measure A, which must pass with a vote; citizens will be taxed $545 over a five -year period. Councilmember Johnson stated the School Board and leaders have explored other sources of funding; people should find $109 per year to help ease the situation at the School District. Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor DeWitt seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor DeWitt stated that he attended public schools; children in school now deserve the same; teachers should be properly paid. Councilmember Daysog stated that he and Councilmember Johnson attended Alameda public schools; he could not repay the teachers, administrator, janitors or counselors; everyone should help the School District, which is a vital asset to the City and its Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 September 18, 2001 neighborhoods. Councilmember Kerr stated the guidelines for the senior exemption will not be set up until after the election; before election day, seniors should have answers to questions, e.g. holding property in trust, community property with only one spouse over 65, apartment houses with principle residents over 65, someone in a nursing home on a long -term basis who rents their house to pay medical bills; voters should have exact information prior to the election. Mayor Appezzato stated the school system contributes to quality of life; if the school system begins to deteriorate, needed programs are not offered, and teachers are not adequately paid, it will not take long for the community to deteriorate; the Judge threw out the lawsuit which challenged the ballot Measure. Councilmember Kerr stated that she would abstain and urged the School District to establish guidelines prior to election day. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, DeWitt, Johnson and Mayor Appezzato - 4. Abstentions: Councilmember Kerr - 1. ( *01 -505) Introduction of Ordinance Approving and Authorizing Execution of Third Lease Amendment Between Mohammad and Farida Sheikh, as Lessees, and the City of Alameda, as Lessor, for the Lease of the Property at 2310 Lincoln Avenue, Linoaks Motel. Introduced. (01 -506) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing Section 4 -37 (Saturday Night Special /Junk Gun Sales Prohibition) of Article V (Firearms and Explosives) of Chapter IV (Offenses and Public Safety). Introduced. Guy Smith, Alameda, stated there are reasons for repealing the Code Section; there is pre - emption by State law; lawsuits are being filed against the City of West Hollywood, which is in violation of the State pre- emption; Saturday Night Specials or Junk Guns were a fake issue and were not the choice of criminals; banning sales only served to disarm the poor in the community; thanked the City for cleaning up the books. Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the Ordinance. Councilmember Kerr seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. * * * Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 September 18, 2001 Mayor Appezzato called a recess at 8:55 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 9:11 p.m. * * * ( *01 -507) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,481,489.32. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (01 -508) Public Hearing to consider a recommendation by the Planning Board to approve Tentative Map 7302 and a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS 00 -05) and Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Initial Study and to consider two Appeals of the Planning Board's decision approving a Planned Development, PD- 01 -02, to set development standards for a 28 -unit subdivision. The property is located at 3500 Oleander Avenue, within the R -2 -PD, Two - Family Residence, Planned Development Combining Zoning District. Applicant: Carl Wesenberg. Appellants: Amberson McColloch /George Thenn. (01 -508A) Resolution No. 13397, "Upholding the Planning Board Approval of Planned Development, PD- 00 -02, at 3500 Oleander (Bay Cove Development." Adopted. (01 -508B) Resolution No. 13398, "Approving Tentative Map 7302 at 3500 Oleander (Bay Cove Development)." Adopted. Mayor Appezzato opened the Public Hearing. Andrea Scarnecchia, Appellant ( Amberson McColloch Appeal), stated that she was representing six homeowners with the support of the Heritage Board; prior to the Council meeting, an agreement was reached with the Developer; concerns regarding lighting, lack of privacy and proximity to backyards, have been addressed by condensing lots 24 and 25 into a single lot; the majority of the homes will be single- story, with possibility for a two -story component on a portion; the Planning Director will assist with parameters; the minimum set back will be 15 -feet; the two -story element would be on the second lot; the two -story maximum height will be 26.6 -feet; the sidewall shall be 12 -feet high, rather than 26 -feet high on the one -story side; the rear yard shall remain 25- feet on lot 24 and 18 -feet on lot 25; minimum sill height parameters on the second story will keep windows from peering into adjacent backyards; requests regarding apparent massing, such as hipped roofing, will reduce the image of a 26 -foot wall; the first story will be no higher than comparable properties in Heritage; the agreement addresses the Appellant's specific issue. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 7 September 18, 2001 Mayor Appezzato stated the second Appeal [regarding gate] would be heard. George Thenn, Appellant, stated a gate was not requested by the Lighthouse Cove Homeowners' Association because the matter was being discussed with the developer; arrangements were being made for escrows to pay for a gate; therefore, the matter was not discussed with City staff. Roy Greer, Alameda, urged Council to approve the Plan. Anthony Calamonaci, Alameda, Cove; parking is an issue; a of the proposed development there does not seem to be sL over into his neighborhood; discussed a gate. stated that he lives at Lighthouse gate should be installed; the design is different than Lighthouse Cove; fficient parking; parking will spill that he was informed the developer Carl Wesenberg, Applicant, Bay Cove LLC, stated that during the past 2- years, there have been discussions regarding the gate; other than a minority group of homeowners, no one wants a gate; the gate has negative impacts, e.g. does not allow refuse trucks or mail delivery to use the site easily; staff does not recommend a gate; the Public Works Department does not want a gate; Bay Cove is willing to eliminate an additional lot and create additional open space in the area [to resolve the McColloch Appeal]; with the understanding reached, the Appellant [McColloch] is withdrawing the Appeal. There being no further speakers, Mayor Appezzato closed the public portion of the Hearing. Mayor Appezzato inquired whether Mr. Wesenberg agreed to all the height limits and other conditions, to which Mr. Wesenberg responded in the affirmative. In response to Mayor Appezzato's inquiry whether all homes would have 2 car garages, Mr. Wesenberg responded in the affirmative. Mayor Appezzato inquired the number of additional parking spaces. Mr. Wesenberg responded there are 14 spaces, which is in excess of the City's requirement for 27 homes; unlike typical development, parking spaces will be throughout the project area; cars will be able to park in driveways; further stated there is nearly 4,000 square feet of common area at the center of the project, not 2,800 square feet as indicated in the staff report; nearly 7,000 square Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 September 18, 2001 feet, 80 of the total site, is common greenscape. Mayor Appezzato inquired whether cars could park on the street, to which Mr. Wesenberg responded in the negative. Mayor Appezzato inquired whether additions would be prohibited on homes in the development. Mr. Wesenberg responded in the affirmative; stated there is a strict building envelope around the homes; people will not be permitted to add on to the square footage. In response to Mayor Appezzato's inquiry whether people would know about the restriction [prohibiting additions] when houses are purchased, Mr. Wesenberg stated people will be aware; it will be included in the CC &Rs. Mayor Appezzato inquired whether Mr. Wesenberg agreed with the conditions negotiated to resolve the Appeal [McColloch], Mr. Wesenberg responded in the affirmative, provided the project is approved. Mayor Appezzato stated the Police and Fire Departments oppose the gate. Councilmember Kerr inquired whether the driveways are long enough to park a car, to which Mr. Wesenberg responded in the affirmative; stated all homes in the rear and smaller homes in the front will have driveway parking. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether residents could use the parking spaces, to which Mr. Wesenberg responded the CC &Rs would preclude residents from using spaces, e.g., for a third car. Councilmember Johnson stated lighting is close to the back of houses; the developer should ensure lighting does not glare in back windows. Mr. Wesenberg stated the lighting will be shielded and the height will be reduced. Vice Mayor DeWitt inquired whether the McColloch Appeal was withdrawn or whether Council should take action on said Appeal. The Planning Director responded the Council should grant the [McColloch] Appeal, in part, with the conditions which have been mutually agreed upon between the neighbors. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 18, 2001 Mayor Appezzato inquired whether Council could move approval of everything which was discussed and direct staff to write up the appropriate document. The Planning Director responded in the affirmative; stated Council should move approval of the [McColloch] Appeal, in part. Mayor Appezzato stated staff should ensure both parties [neighbors and developer] agree with conditions prepared by staff. Councilmember Kerr inquired whether Council will grant the [McColloch] Appeal, with condition that there be one house on lots 24 and 25, to implement the discussion tonight. The Planning Director responded in the affirmative; stated 48 -inch sill height or fixed and translucent windows will be included also. McColloch Appeal: Vice Mayor DeWitt moved approval of granting the Appeal in part, including discussion of lots 24 and 25. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Thenn Appeal: Vice Mayor DeWitt moved denial of the Appeal. Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether the residents could request the gate be reviewed if a problem arises. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated denying the Appeal does not result in neighbors enduring conditions forever. The Planning Director stated the City Council should approve the Negative Declaration and Tentative Map; stated the draft Tentative Map will be amended to reflect there are 27 lots now. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the Negative Declaration and Tentative Map [adoption of Resolutions: 1) Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS00 -05, and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Tentative Map TM -7302; and 2) Approving Tentative Map 7302 at 3500 Oleander]. Councilmember Kerr seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 September 18, 2001 (01 -509) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Historical Advisory Board's decision approving the removal of a Coast Live Oak tree, a protected species. The property is located at 301 Spruce Street within the R -2, Two - Family Residence Zoning District. Applicant: Hinh Ngyuyen. Appellants: Patrick G. Lynch /Jeanne Nader. (01 -509A) Resolution No. 13399, "Upholding the Historical Advisory Board Approving Certificate of Approval, CA- 01 -08, 301 Spruce Street." Mayor Appezzato opened the public hearing. Opponent (Not in favor of Appeal): Anthony Phan, Applicant's representative. There being no further speakers, Mayor Appezzato closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Appezzato stated the stump is large and does not appear to be live; other trees will be preserved; two additional 10- gallon trees will be planted. Councilmember Daysog requested a report reviewing tree ordinances; stated the applicants are following procedure. Councilmember Johnson moved approval of upholding the Historical Advisory Board's decision [adoption of the Resolution Upholding the Historical Advisory Board Approving Certificate of Approval, CA -01- 08, 301 Spruce Street]. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Kerr stated that she will support the motion, with regret for the exceptional tree. Mayor Appezzato stated nothing can be built without removing the stump. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Vice Mayor DeWitt stated the Appellant should not be required to pay the appeal fee; the Appeal was not for personal gratification, rather it was to retain the beautiful tree. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of waiving the appeal fee. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 1 September 18, 2001 Councilmember Kerr seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON- AGENDA (01 -510) Rod Murray, Alameda, stated that he has lived in the same apartment for 18 years; the apartment was sold last June; he and eight others in the apartment complex were given a notice to vacate within 30 days, which was not based upon previous mishaps; the [eviction] notice read: "the service of this notice does not reflect on your tenancy or your payment history;" he was given the option to rent another recently vacated unit; his rent was $900 per month and will become $1500 per month, which is a 70% increase; others face increases of around 800; one tenant, a retired woman with a fixed income, was forced to move; another single woman had to move in with a friend; one month does not provide sufficient time to relocate; further stated a law was created this year which requires tenants be provided at least two months to adjust to [rent] increases of 100; the landlord got around the law because it is apartment renovation; the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) cannot hear the matter because it is apartment eviction; the City is considering a new Housing Element; some communities have unjust evictions considered in Housing Elements; said option has been considered before; however, it was turned down due to the Board of Realtors' strength; Alameda does not have rent control; the City should have unjust eviction addressed in the Housing Element. Mayor Appezzato requested staff to look into the comments about the RRAC. Councilmember Kerr concurred with Mayor Appezzato's request and noted the RRAC has solved many problems in the past. Mayor Appezzato stated the City is trying to build additional housing; Council adopted an affordable housing policy; there should be a balance between housing and jobs. Councilmember Kerr inquired the address of the property, to which Mr. Murray responded 1911 and 1909 Santa Clara Avenue. Councilmember Kerr stated that she would be waiting for the report from the City Manager's Office on the RRAC; maybe the Committee's scope needs to be expanded a little bit. (01 -511) Jean Sweeney, Alameda, stated the General Plan discusses implementing the policies of parks and recreation, and planned parks; 10 acres or more are to be acquired and developed for an Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 September 18, 2001 estuary park; General Plan Diagram, Figure 3.1, indicates a park along 1,400 feet of estuary frontage west of Oak Street in a mixed use area; the area is along the water north of Thompson Field and McKinley Park, from the Marine Corp. Installation to Oak Street; the General Plan states: "This park will require a major funding commitment by the City, but will probably do more than any other single project to ensure Alameda's long term quality. It could have the character of San Francisco's Marina Green and would attract all age groups to enjoy large and small boats on the estuary, views of the Oakland skyline and hills, and active sports. The new park would serve a sector of the City that is short of park space and would guarantee the high quality of housing proposed for that area." Ms. Sweeney further stated someone is planning a housing project in said area [Laguna Harbor] ; people in Alameda should be asked whether there should be housing or the planned park in said area; the West End, along the waterfront, is short of parks; McKinley Park is not adequate; the State is considering $109 Million Park Bond; Brownfields has funding to clean parks; water quality has funding to protect water runoff; the citizens of Alameda should be permitted to review the matter, rather than allowing the property to be developed, eliminating the chance for a park at the site. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (01 -512) Councilmember Kerr suggested the Meeting be adjourned with a moment of silence for Dan Lasar; stated Mr. Lasar did a lot for the golf course as a Golf Commissioner; when the Rent Review Advisory Committee started 20 years ago, Mr. Lasar was the first Chair and served on the Committee ever since; he brightened the air around him with his laughter, contributed so much to the community and will be missed. (01 -513) Vice Mayor DeWitt stated that he attended the 65th Anniversary celebration of the Bohol Circle Organization, which is a Filipino American organization with many members in Alameda; the celebration was started with a Mass in remembrance of the September 11 tragedy. (01 -514) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Golf Commission. Mayor Appezzato nominated Anthony M. Santare for Appointment to the Golf Commission. (01 -515) Mayor Appezzato thanked the City staff, Police Department and Fire Department for opening the Emergency Operations Center last Tuesday [September 11, 2001]. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 13 September 18, 2001 (01 -516) Mayor Appezzato stated Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding was increased; the City will receive over $1.4 Million in CDBG funds this year. ADJOURNMENT (01 -517) There being no further business, Mayor Appezzato adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:10 p.m., in memory of Dan Lasar, founding member of the Rent Review Advisory Committee and former Golf Commissioner, and in memory of our fellow Americans in the three East Coast States who lost their lives, are still missing and were injured [on September 11, 2001]. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Acting City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 September 18, 2001